Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
US Running out of Bombs to drop on ISIS
Comments
-
L
Obama doesn't need a bill to do this. But you knew that.2001400ex said:
Then why don't the Republicans pass a bill to accomplish this?Doogles said:
Pounding sand with missiles isn't the way to fight this war. Maybe they get a target here or there, but you're not fighting a country with borders. It's all a show for you puppet.2001400ex said:I thought the US wasn't doing anything to fight ISIS. Wtf?
If Obama wanted to stop Isis he'd give Putin a call and they'd tag team the middle east and raid the oil fields. Give a call to the Paki's, Saudis, every other semblance of local government in the region and let them know either root out your own evil or you're getting taken over.
Why the democrat controlled congress in 2009-2011 pass "common sense" gun laws is a better question. -
50,000 sorties dropping 20,000 bombs on a force of 30,000 with no real effect, how dare anyone question obama's leadership.
-
Obama just needs more bullets to beat the JV SquadHuskyInAZ said:50,000 sorties dropping 20,000 bombs on a force of 30,000 with no real effect, how dare anyone question obama's leadership.
-
I'm hearing he has them contained. Libfucks love to mock Cheney's comment about Iraq insurgency being in it's last throws, yet are silent when their guy says something equally fucktarded.Houhusky said:
Obama just needs more bullets to beat the JV SquadHuskyInAZ said:50,000 sorties dropping 20,000 bombs on a force of 30,000 with no real effect, how dare anyone question obama's leadership.
-
-
No but the president can't go to war without congressional approval. All he can do is a limited fight like we are doing now.Houhusky said:
Republicans are the "Comander in Cheif" now?2001400ex said:
Then why don't the Republicans pass a bill to accomplish this?Doogles said:
Pounding sand with missiles isn't the way to fight this war. Maybe they get a target here or there, but you're not fighting a country with borders. It's all a show for you puppet.2001400ex said:I thought the US wasn't doing anything to fight ISIS. Wtf?
If Obama wanted to stop Isis he'd give Putin a call and they'd tag team the middle east and raid the oil fields. Give a call to the Paki's, Saudis, every other semblance of local government in the region and let them know either root out your own evil or you're getting taken over. -
Yes Democrats should have passed better regulations over weapons. What's your point?WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:L
Obama doesn't need a bill to do this. But you knew that.2001400ex said:
Then why don't the Republicans pass a bill to accomplish this?Doogles said:
Pounding sand with missiles isn't the way to fight this war. Maybe they get a target here or there, but you're not fighting a country with borders. It's all a show for you puppet.2001400ex said:I thought the US wasn't doing anything to fight ISIS. Wtf?
If Obama wanted to stop Isis he'd give Putin a call and they'd tag team the middle east and raid the oil fields. Give a call to the Paki's, Saudis, every other semblance of local government in the region and let them know either root out your own evil or you're getting taken over.
Why the democrat controlled congress in 2009-2011 pass "common sense" gun laws is a better question. -
Can you link to where Obama has asked for a declaration of war? Was it when he said AQ is on the run or when he called ISIS the JV team?2001400ex said:
No but the president can't go to war without congressional approval. All he can do is a limited fight like we are doing now.Houhusky said:
Republicans are the "Comander in Cheif" now?2001400ex said:
Then why don't the Republicans pass a bill to accomplish this?Doogles said:
Pounding sand with missiles isn't the way to fight this war. Maybe they get a target here or there, but you're not fighting a country with borders. It's all a show for you puppet.2001400ex said:I thought the US wasn't doing anything to fight ISIS. Wtf?
If Obama wanted to stop Isis he'd give Putin a call and they'd tag team the middle east and raid the oil fields. Give a call to the Paki's, Saudis, every other semblance of local government in the region and let them know either root out your own evil or you're getting taken over.
Does the constitution differentiate between limited war and REAL war and how far the President can go?
Fuck -
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/02/11/letter-president-authorization-use-united-states-armed-forces-connectionRaceBannon said:
Can you link to where Obama has asked for a declaration of war? Was it when he said AQ is on the run or when he called ISIS the JV team?2001400ex said:
No but the president can't go to war without congressional approval. All he can do is a limited fight like we are doing now.Houhusky said:
Republicans are the "Comander in Cheif" now?2001400ex said:
Then why don't the Republicans pass a bill to accomplish this?Doogles said:
Pounding sand with missiles isn't the way to fight this war. Maybe they get a target here or there, but you're not fighting a country with borders. It's all a show for you puppet.2001400ex said:I thought the US wasn't doing anything to fight ISIS. Wtf?
If Obama wanted to stop Isis he'd give Putin a call and they'd tag team the middle east and raid the oil fields. Give a call to the Paki's, Saudis, every other semblance of local government in the region and let them know either root out your own evil or you're getting taken over.
Does the constitution differentiate between limited war and REAL war and how far the President can go?
Fuck
February of this year.
Any more stupid ass questions? -
You should read what you link. Your boyfriend's own words -
I have directed a comprehensive and sustained strategy to degrade and defeat ISIL. As part of this strategy, U.S. military forces are conducting a systematic campaign of airstrikes against ISIL in Iraq and Syria. Although existing statutes provide me with the authority I need to take these actions,
Anymore stupid ass defenses of your hero?
