So you're proposing things that wouldn't have stopped any of the recent shootings. Good job. We "did something". Let's pay each other on the back and then act shocked and appalled when the next shooting happens.
Better yet. Let's do nothing and just keep letting people die. Much better plan.
Fuck you are stupid.
How about do the right things instead of "something". Your doing "something" doesn't reduce the body count. But you can feel good because you have good intentions. Speaking of dumb fucks , can you name one law the left is proposing that would have prevent these attacks? There is only one answer. Confiscation. And libtards even know what happens when there is prohibition.
I've never quite understood why rank-n-file pruogressives dislike the 2nd Amendment and individual rights to defense, sport, etc. I know why their mandarins do. The same folks protesting police will also say individuals don't need means for self defense because the police will take care of them.
I've never quite understood why rank-n-file pruogressives dislike the 2nd Amendment and individual rights to defense, sport, etc. I know why their mandarins do. The same folks protesting police will also say individuals don't need means for self defense because the police will take care of them.
But who will take care of them when it is the police doing the shooting?
Or are you calling for open season on cops so individuals can protect themselves, from the cops?
If so I'm in, love me some Grand Theft Auto rampages, boiiii!!!
So, I'm watching the news the other night and that stupid cunt Andrea Mitchell is going on and on about the need for background checks. Hey, Andrea, there already ARE background checks, especially in California where the shootings took place. I've bought several guns in Oregon and I'm sure the system in Cali is similar - you fill out an extensive set of forms, the seller fingerprints you, and all that info is sent off to the state police for verification. In both my purchases it took about 2 hours to get the approval back from the state. I wouldn't be surprised if the process in California took much longer.
The hue and cry about the need for "background checks" is coming from people who are either uninformed, intentionally or otherwise, OR are committed to spread misinformation to the public. It's probably the latter. That's certainly the case with Obama, who would rather focus on gun ownership than see the danger of worldwide terrorism.
Calling the private and legal transfer of goods between two citizens a loophole says a lot about your stance on personal freedoms
I think we should close the free speech loophole that allows a anonymous people to spew ignorant, hateful or false speech and rhetoric all over the Internet.
People should have to properly identify themselves before posting so we can store who says what. We won't impede on your freedoms though.
Secondly we should ban this horrible free exchange of rhetoric on unregulated non governmental message boards. We aren't going to take away ALL of your free speech, just put some common sense laws in place to protect our children.
So, I'm watching the news the other night and that stupid cunt Andrea Mitchell is going on and on about the need for background checks. Hey, Andrea, there already ARE background checks, especially in California where the shootings took place. I've bought several guns in Oregon and I'm sure the system in Cali is similar - you fill out an extensive set of forms, the seller fingerprints you, and all that info is sent off to the state police for verification. In both my purchases it took about 2 hours to get the approval back from the state. I wouldn't be surprised if the process in California took much longer.
The hue and cry about the need for "background checks" is coming from people who are either uninformed, intentionally or otherwise, OR are committed to spread misinformation to the public. It's probably the latter. That's certainly the case with Obama, who would rather focus on gun ownership than see the danger of worldwide terrorism.
Oh yeah. What about the gun show loophole. What about that?
Calling the private and legal transfer of goods between two citizens a loophole says a lot about your stance on personal freedoms
I think we should close the free speech loophole that allows a anonymous people to spew ignorant, hateful or false speech and rhetoric all over the Internet.
People should have to properly identify themselves before posting so we can store who says what. We won't impede on your freedoms though.
Secondly we should ban this horrible free exchange of rhetoric on unregulated non governmental message boards. We aren't going to take away ALL of your free speech, just put some common sense laws in place to protect our children.
#WeHave2DoSomething
For the love of God (or Allah) will someone think of the children?!!!!1!
I've never quite understood why rank-n-file pruogressives dislike the 2nd Amendment and individual rights to defense, sport, etc. I know why their mandarins do. The same folks protesting police will also say individuals don't need means for self defense because the police will take care of them.
45 minutes late to check for evidence at the scene as you lie dead facedown in your own blood.
Why are you continuing to politicize this Islamic Jihad attack in California into gun confiscation, hondo?
Why are you so ignorant, Sark?
Tell us more about peaceful India. Rofl!!!!!1!1!1!1!1!
India has a much lower rate than the US and infinitely lower rate than next door neighbor Pakistan.
India has had over 50 terror attacks since 9/11/2001. If you listen to Obama, we've had zero. But I would say we've had 4. Ft Hood, Chattanooga, Boston and San Bernardino. Even a dip shit of your magnitude knows that 50 > 4.
Indians living in peace. Fuck. Could you be more fucking stupid?
Why are you continuing to politicize this Islamic Jihad attack in California into gun confiscation, hondo?
Why are you so ignorant, Sark?
Tell us more about peaceful India. Rofl!!!!!1!1!1!1!1!
India has a much lower rate than the US and infinitely lower rate than next door neighbor Pakistan.
India has had over 50 terror attacks since 9/11/2001. If you listen to Obama, we've had zero. But I would say we've had 4. Ft Hood, Chattanooga, Boston and San Bernardino. Even a dip shit of your magnitude knows that 50 > 4.
Indians living in peace. Fuck. Could you be more fucking stupid?
Comments
The same folks protesting police will also say individuals don't need means for self defense because the police will take care of them.
Or are you calling for open season on cops so individuals can protect themselves, from the cops?
If so I'm in, love me some Grand Theft Auto rampages, boiiii!!!
The hue and cry about the need for "background checks" is coming from people who are either uninformed, intentionally or otherwise, OR are committed to spread misinformation to the public. It's probably the latter. That's certainly the case with Obama, who would rather focus on gun ownership than see the danger of worldwide terrorism.
I think we should close the free speech loophole that allows a anonymous people to spew ignorant, hateful or false speech and rhetoric all over the Internet.
People should have to properly identify themselves before posting so we can store who says what. We won't impede on your freedoms though.
Secondly we should ban this horrible free exchange of rhetoric on unregulated non governmental message boards. We aren't going to take away ALL of your free speech, just put some common sense laws in place to protect our children.
#WeHave2DoSomething
Causation?
Indians living in peace. Fuck. Could you be more fucking stupid?