Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is Bugging Me

2»

Comments

  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,964
    It's deeper than that ... I don't think you can look at Petersen's past at Boise and figure out what he's for or against by just looking at box scores. There's going to be a unique subset that really will spell out what it is that he wants to do.

    I'm not unconvinced that some of the shift to throwing this year is to get Browning experience. How much of that experience is for the future at the expense of this year is a good question. Year still needs to play out.

    And yes, I do think that if the PI on Perkins is not called, we win the Utah game.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,910 Swaye's Wigwam
    We've got to dive deeper into the metrics, everyone says so
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,964
    BA II Plus or GTFO
  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,526 Founders Club

    Maybe the Gaskin needs 25+ carries is overblown, but it you honestly think this over analytical pass happy offense hasn't cost UW multiple games, DIAFF because you are a hopeless doog.

    I am convinced if we ran 60/40 run/pass ratio this year we would have 2 more wins between Cal/Oregon/Utah.

    Smith and Pete's hard on for "balance" with a freshman qb and wr's below average has made no sense all year. I can see next year's offense being able to do this, but not this year's team.

    It would be interesting to see the % of first downs we've had when we started the first and 10 with a pass play versus a running play.

    Pete wanted to be "stubborn" with the run at USC. I wish they would have been "stubborn" with it all year.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Here's a good plan for our offense:

    First and 10: Run the ball to Gaskin 80% of the time. Mostly out of the I formation. Sometimes throw out of the I on play action once the Gaskin carries average above 4 ypc.

    2nd and 6+: Throw a slant to FUCKING PETTIS. NEVER TO MICKENS.

    2nd and 2-6: Run a trap or something with Gaskin 80% of the time; play action if he's getting 5 ypc.

    2nd and 1-2: Play action.

    3rd and 5+: Throw over the middle.

    3rd and 1-5: Throw over the middle.
  • CaptainPJCaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986

    Tequilla said:

    I think there's more to it than what you are describing @RoadDawg55 ... I'll try to take a deep dive into some numbers in the near future to try to get to the heart of it. There's some surface area stats that I'm fairly confident without looking would give conflicting results.

    Regardless, there needs to be a strong reconsideration of what's going on offensively in the offseason. The areas that have sucked there have been so fucktardedly bad that it actually is overshadowing some of the good things going on on offense.

    So you'll circle back and drill down?
    Will we then level-set and align on strategy?
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    CaptainPJ said:

    Tequilla said:

    I think there's more to it than what you are describing @RoadDawg55 ... I'll try to take a deep dive into some numbers in the near future to try to get to the heart of it. There's some surface area stats that I'm fairly confident without looking would give conflicting results.

    Regardless, there needs to be a strong reconsideration of what's going on offensively in the offseason. The areas that have sucked there have been so fucktardedly bad that it actually is overshadowing some of the good things going on on offense.

    So you'll circle back and drill down?
    Will we then level-set and align on strategy?
    Synergize data, form a task force, and send it to committee. Don't want to step on any toes, but rather we need to get people together and achieve consensus on this before sending it through the proper channels.
  • CaptainPJCaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986

    CaptainPJ said:

    Tequilla said:

    I think there's more to it than what you are describing @RoadDawg55 ... I'll try to take a deep dive into some numbers in the near future to try to get to the heart of it. There's some surface area stats that I'm fairly confident without looking would give conflicting results.

    Regardless, there needs to be a strong reconsideration of what's going on offensively in the offseason. The areas that have sucked there have been so fucktardedly bad that it actually is overshadowing some of the good things going on on offense.

    So you'll circle back and drill down?
    Will we then level-set and align on strategy?
    Synergize data, form a task force, and send it to committee. Don't want to step on any toes, but rather we need to get people together and achieve consensus on this before sending it through the proper channels.
    Achieve synergy and become disruptive?
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Tequilla's tldr screeds disrupt my bowels.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,422 Founders Club
    Where's my safe place?
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,542 Founders Club

    Where's my safe place?

    Call the police. That's their job.
Sign In or Register to comment.