So I'm hearing we should ignore Shaw's well-documented game management issues because he has a 49-13 (.790) record. And I'm also hearing we should fire Peterman and his 104-23 (.819) record because of alleged game management issues. Interesting.
So I'm hearing we should ignore Shaw's well-documented game management issues because he has a 49-13 (.790) record. And I'm also hearing we should fire Peterman and his 104-23 (.819) record because of alleged game management issues. Interesting.
Those records are apples to oranges and you know that
So I'm hearing we should ignore Shaw's well-documented game management issues because he has a 49-13 (.790) record. And I'm also hearing we should fire Peterman and his 104-23 (.819) record because of alleged game management issues. Interesting.
My issue with Peterman is his offense sucks. That's not just game management, that's scheme, selection of assistants, development and game management.
And Peterman's Boise record comes with a pretty major record. Yes, the Stanford Shaw inherited >>>> the UW Peterman inherited, but Shaw is 35-6 in conference and that's not counting 2-0 in P12 championship games. He's 37-6 against the Pac.
At UW, Peterman is 6-9. He's already lost three more conference games than Shaw has with 31 fewer wins.
I'm not on the Fire Peterman bandwagon yet. I'm willing to give him one more year. But I'm seriously concerned. And if you wouldn't trade him for Shaw @GrandpaSankey has a doctor you should visit.
I was leading the lynch Shaw movement here and I apologize to any Missouri students reading this from their safe place. But he is proving over time to be the real deal.
It's like some of you don't even pay attention. Yes we want to fire every coach after every loss but not really. If Petersen was 92-12 here we'd be lining up to suck his dick.
But Jerry, I don't give a fuck about Boise State. I'm a Husky fan and his record here sucks.
Shaw survived the end of the Harbaugh era and has his own guys in there and is still winning the conference. So he goes 11-1 who gives a fuck about the Northwestern game.
If UW went 11-1 this year I'd be over the Boise loss. Maybe. You don't have to be unbeaten to win the natty anymore. UW has been unbeaten once in 100 years. Oregon never has. If Stanford has it was a century ago. Even USC rarely goes unbeaten. Bama drops a game every year.
A guy who recruits big linemen and runs the shit out of the ball would be a great Husky coach. If he wins and Shaw wins.
Every coach makes stupid decisions in the game because we are watching from the comfort of mom's basement with nothing better to do than second guess.
It's called being a fan. If you're point is to claim Petersen is better than Shaw you are simply wrong. I'm sure there are better coaches than Shaw but not all that many
I was leading the lynch Shaw movement here and I apologize to any Missouri students reading this from their safe place. But he is proving over time to be the real deal.
It's like some of you don't even pay attention. Yes we want to fire every coach after every loss but not really. If Petersen was 92-12 here we'd be lining up to suck his dick.
But Jerry, I don't give a fuck about Boise State. I'm a Husky fan and his record here sucks.
Shaw survived the end of the Harbaugh era and has his own guys in there and is still winning the conference. So he goes 11-1 who gives a fuck about the Northwestern game.
If UW went 11-1 this year I'd be over the Boise loss. Maybe. You don't have to be unbeaten to win the natty anymore. UW has been unbeaten once in 100 years. Oregon never has. If Stanford has it was a century ago. Even USC rarely goes unbeaten. Bama drops a game every year.
A guy who recruits big linemen and runs the shit out of the ball would be a great Husky coach. If he wins and Shaw wins.
Every coach makes stupid decisions in the game because we are watching from the comfort of mom's basement with nothing better to do than second guess.
It's called being a fan. If you're point is to claim Petersen is better than Shaw you are simply wrong. I'm sure there are better coaches than Shaw but not all that many
Shaw has been there long enough to be rid of the Hardbaugh's players crutch. He's not elite but they always have a great o line, usually haveca good defense, and they kick people's ass physically. It's sort of how Dawg football was.
So yeah, gun pointed at head, he seems great now. I'm willing to LIPO and see where the program is at next 11/10. If it's 4-5 or 5-4 and Hungry Bowl time, Petersen needs to hit the road.
I used to bag on Shaw because he would always lose a game against an inferior team, but then realized pretty much every coach in college football does that every year. The problem is he coaches in the Pac-12 so that one loss is enough to drop them from the playoffs.
Comments
This bored would want him shitcanned after one game.
And Peterman's Boise record comes with a pretty major record. Yes, the Stanford Shaw inherited >>>> the UW Peterman inherited, but Shaw is 35-6 in conference and that's not counting 2-0 in P12 championship games. He's 37-6 against the Pac.
At UW, Peterman is 6-9. He's already lost three more conference games than Shaw has with 31 fewer wins.
I'm not on the Fire Peterman bandwagon yet. I'm willing to give him one more year. But I'm seriously concerned. And if you wouldn't trade him for Shaw @GrandpaSankey has a doctor you should visit.
It's like some of you don't even pay attention. Yes we want to fire every coach after every loss but not really. If Petersen was 92-12 here we'd be lining up to suck his dick.
But Jerry, I don't give a fuck about Boise State. I'm a Husky fan and his record here sucks.
Shaw survived the end of the Harbaugh era and has his own guys in there and is still winning the conference. So he goes 11-1 who gives a fuck about the Northwestern game.
If UW went 11-1 this year I'd be over the Boise loss. Maybe. You don't have to be unbeaten to win the natty anymore. UW has been unbeaten once in 100 years. Oregon never has. If Stanford has it was a century ago. Even USC rarely goes unbeaten. Bama drops a game every year.
A guy who recruits big linemen and runs the shit out of the ball would be a great Husky coach. If he wins and Shaw wins.
Every coach makes stupid decisions in the game because we are watching from the comfort of mom's basement with nothing better to do than second guess.
It's called being a fan. If you're point is to claim Petersen is better than Shaw you are simply wrong. I'm sure there are better coaches than Shaw but not all that many
Save this
So yeah, gun pointed at head, he seems great now. I'm willing to LIPO and see where the program is at next 11/10. If it's 4-5 or 5-4 and Hungry Bowl time, Petersen needs to hit the road.