If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
Did I stutter?
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
Did I stutter?
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
Sometimes, regardless of what the other team is good at, you stick with what you do best. What we do best is run the ball.
When Stanford plays Oregon this weekend, they will run the shit out of the ball despite Oregon having a porous pass defense. Same goes for when they play Utah.
The excuses for this staff are beyond old. If they cut the cutesy bullshit and played to the strength of the team, which is clearly running the ball, this season would look a lot better and we would all be pumped about next year.
Huskies aren't THAT much better at running the ball to excuse ignoring the fact that they would be running against the 17th ranked run defense instead of passing against the 92nd ranked pass defense.
Stanford's running game is FAR FAR better than their passing game and Oregon's run defense still sucks. I expect Stanford can run against almost anyone. The Huskies, not so much... They have to be more strategic.
As for the cutsie plays, I agree those are annoying as hell. And Lindquist is no Tim Tebow or Blake Bell so they need to give that up. But Peterson should eventually change. Coaches are stubborn, even great ones.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?
You missed the point big time ...
Anybody that watches Utah knows that running the ball on them is tough sledding and that in the defensive backfield they aren't going to have the elite athletes that other teams have that you normally associate with strong pass defenses. I don't need to see the ranking numbers to figure that out.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
Sometimes, regardless of what the other team is good at, you stick with what you do best. What we do best is run the ball.
When Stanford plays Oregon this weekend, they will run the shit out of the ball despite Oregon having a porous pass defense. Same goes for when they play Utah.
The excuses for this staff are beyond old. If they cut the cutesy bullshit and played to the strength of the team, which is clearly running the ball, this season would look a lot better and we would all be pumped about next year.
These are the kinds of comments that shine a glaring light on identity, vision, plan, mission ... pick your favorite buzz word
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
Did I stutter?
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?
You missed the point big time ...
Anybody that watches Utah knows that running the ball on them is tough sledding and that in the defensive backfield they aren't going to have the elite athletes that other teams have that you normally associate with strong pass defenses. I don't need to see the ranking numbers to figure that out.
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
Did I stutter?
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparently
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.
Stanford's Rushing Defense is ranked #15 in total yards and #24 in YPC while Washington's is 113 in total yards and 84th in YPC. Stanford can run on whoever they want. Washinton, not so much. Hell, Washington ranks better in passing than running at 71 in total yards and 54 in YPA (Washington state has a lower YPA!).
If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness.
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
Did I stutter?
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
Did I stutter?
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
Did I stutter?
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point
Keep telling yourself that.
Ok
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
Did I stutter?
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point
Keep telling yourself that.
Ok
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a little
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.
Did I stutter?
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possible
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad point
Keep telling yourself that.
Ok
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.
Comments
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
Stanford's running game is FAR FAR better than their passing game and Oregon's run defense still sucks. I expect Stanford can run against almost anyone. The Huskies, not so much... They have to be more strategic.
As for the cutsie plays, I agree those are annoying as hell. And Lindquist is no Tim Tebow or Blake Bell so they need to give that up. But Peterson should eventually change. Coaches are stubborn, even great ones.
What a fucking disappointment that turned out to be.
Anybody that watches Utah knows that running the ball on them is tough sledding and that in the defensive backfield they aren't going to have the elite athletes that other teams have that you normally associate with strong pass defenses. I don't need to see the ranking numbers to figure that out.
If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness.