Great story about why coaching matters
Comments
-
Good point. I just lazily looked up average scoring and then called it a week.FremontTroll said:
Adjusted for their opponents that offense was very mediocre.HFNY said:I don't really care if he's flexible or inflexible though, as long as they score more points. Run the same play over and over if they have to....the ends justifies the means.
One other thing, for as much as people like to criticize Petersen's last year at BSU in 2013, I think his offense was actually 17th in the nation in points per game.RoadDawg55 said:This is the type of shit that has me extremely concerned about Petersen. A coach can still run a tough, discipline program and still be flexible at the same time.
-
UW simply needs whatever offense that can score 40 in a Pac game, not this 20 crap. Start throwing high-arcs deep, it's ok if a 50 yard pass gets intercepted at this point of ineptness.
-
Exactly, no one cares.HFNY said:Good points but....NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR VEGAS TALK!!!!!11!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!
FremontTroll said:Neat little story but its not like Florida was in the middle of a HUUUGE REBUILDING YEAR in 2005.
They were favored by 4 in that game. They won by 4. Not because of the offense- the offense sucked balls. It was one of the worst games of the year for an offense that averaged 27 points against power 5 conference teams.
They won because they held Georgia to 4.5 yards per play and Georgia missed two field goals.
Maybe you can learn something. -
But stillFremontTroll said:Neat little story but its not like Florida was in the middle of a HUUUGE REBUILDING YEAR in 2005.
They were favored by 4 in that game. They won by 4. Not because of the offense- the offense sucked balls. It was one of the worst games of the year for an offense that averaged 27 points against power 5 conference teams.
They won because they held Georgia to 4.5 yards per play and Georgia missed two field goals. -
You like to make posts acting like you don't downplay winning, then write a fucking novel that downplays winning. It's what you like to do.Tequilla said:Not to downplay the whole winning thing because not only does it matter, but it's the only stat that anybody should ever give 2 shits about.
But given the overall youth on the roster, and given that in many ways that this year is as much about player development as anything else, there's a fine line between developing players and winning games.
Browning hasn't been great this year ... and I don't think anybody is expecting him to be. But if what we get over the next 2-3 years is due in part to taking some lumps this year, then wouldn't the future payoff be worth it? -
I think it was during the Texas-TCU game earlier this year that the guys in the booth were talking about Texas' problems, and one of them said something along the lines of "Yeah, Texas is young and inexperienced, but look at TCU; their freshmen are making plays."
-
TCU starts 4 SR OL, along with a SR Heisman candidate at QB and a SR WR who may be the best WR in the country. So, yeah, it's all about those FR making plays.BearsWiin said:I think it was during the Texas-TCU game earlier this year that the guys in the booth were talking about Texas' problems, and one of them said something along the lines of "Yeah, Texas is young and inexperienced, but look at TCU; their freshmen are making plays."
-
Of course it isn't. It's also about the coaching staff putting those freshmen in a position to make plays.HuskyInAZ said:
TCU starts 4 SR OL, along with a SR Heisman candidate at QB and a SR WR who may be the best WR in the country. So, yeah, it's all about those FR making plays.BearsWiin said:I think it was during the Texas-TCU game earlier this year that the guys in the booth were talking about Texas' problems, and one of them said something along the lines of "Yeah, Texas is young and inexperienced, but look at TCU; their freshmen are making plays."
-
