Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Woodward and Emmert

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,895 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
Woodward's kid and Emmert's kid got married awhile back.

W, JW
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,084 Founders Club
    DerekJohnson said:

    Woodward's kid and Emmert's kid got married awhile back.

    W, JW

    Hey, gay marriage is legal now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,084 Founders Club
    Fuck you and your 53 seconds nacho gobbler.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    Not surprising.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,353 Founders Club
    You may now kiss the father of the bride
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    Kind of weird that the kids will have the same two dads ...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WeAreAFatLesboSchoolWeAreAFatLesboSchool Guest Posts: 736
    Pics?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 5,035 Standard Supporter
    JFC

    FTG. both of them
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    "Woodward requires more than simply on field excellence, pushing his staff and the student-athletes at the University of Washington to reach new heights in all of their endeavors."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,963
    I'd say that I'd be 100% behind turning up heat on Woodward ... but until getting an idea of how the new UW President will view athletics, I'm not entirely sure that I would trust her to make an educated hire in that position until I see more from her. Given our recent hires, I'm optimistic that keeping somebody in house that actually views the University in the right frame instead of looking to either use the job as a stepping stone or resume booster will be right.

    However, and while I realize that the University has plenty of things to be proud of, until the University realizes that the MOST PUBLIC of its advertising is what happens on the fields and courts of its Athletic Programs and that their overall performance is as much a reflection on the University as all of the medical, scientific, etc. research that is done elsewhere, I'm not going to have 100% confidence in any of the University's leadership to demand and hold accountable job performance in this area.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,963
    RaceBannon said:

    Tequilla said:

    I'd say that I'd be 100% behind turning up heat on Woodward ... but until getting an idea of how the new UW President will view athletics, I'm not entirely sure that I would trust her to make an educated hire in that position until I see more from her. Given our recent hires, I'm optimistic that keeping somebody in house that actually views the University in the right frame instead of looking to either use the job as a stepping stone or resume booster will be right.

    However, and while I realize that the University has plenty of things to be proud of, until the University realizes that the MOST PUBLIC of its advertising is what happens on the fields and courts of its Athletic Programs and that their overall performance is as much a reflection on the University as all of the medical, scientific, etc. research that is done elsewhere, I'm not going to have 100% confidence in any of the University's leadership to demand and hold accountable job performance in this area.

    I've decided I want to work for you. I'll hit my desk bottle all day and smoke dope with the IT guys and miss every deadline and target and you'll have my back.

    There is literally nobody shitty enough at their job for you to say so.
    Definitely disagree about that.

    There's a difference between what I'd do if I was in charge of making the decision on Woodward and what I think when looking at who is making the decisions on him.

    If it was me, Woodward's at best an average AD. His steadfast backing of Romar is barely explainable at this point. Romar's a nice guy that parlayed a few nice years into an entitlement/retirement package. He's gutted the program and I'm sure blamed it on a handful of people here/there that have since left the program. When I hear people say "we lost our culture and need to go back to it," that tells me that you got fat, happy, and lazy. Those aren't traits that you find in winners.

    Now, if you look at the track record of hiring from the University of Washington's perspective, it wouldn't shock me if they made a hire that was worse than what Woodward is. Which is why that gives me pause.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    RaceBannon said:

    Tequilla said:

    I'd say that I'd be 100% behind turning up heat on Woodward ... but until getting an idea of how the new UW President will view athletics, I'm not entirely sure that I would trust her to make an educated hire in that position until I see more from her. Given our recent hires, I'm optimistic that keeping somebody in house that actually views the University in the right frame instead of looking to either use the job as a stepping stone or resume booster will be right.

    However, and while I realize that the University has plenty of things to be proud of, until the University realizes that the MOST PUBLIC of its advertising is what happens on the fields and courts of its Athletic Programs and that their overall performance is as much a reflection on the University as all of the medical, scientific, etc. research that is done elsewhere, I'm not going to have 100% confidence in any of the University's leadership to demand and hold accountable job performance in this area.

    I've decided I want to work for you. I'll hit my desk bottle all day and smoke dope with the IT guys and miss every deadline and target and you'll have my back.

    There is literally nobody shitty enough at their job for you to say so.
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,570 Founders Club
    image

    The scarfiest gala in the land
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Will there be a new DAWG in nineteen years? Woof!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,530
    Tequilla said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Tequilla said:

    I'd say that I'd be 100% behind turning up heat on Woodward ... but until getting an idea of how the new UW President will view athletics, I'm not entirely sure that I would trust her to make an educated hire in that position until I see more from her. Given our recent hires, I'm optimistic that keeping somebody in house that actually views the University in the right frame instead of looking to either use the job as a stepping stone or resume booster will be right.

    However, and while I realize that the University has plenty of things to be proud of, until the University realizes that the MOST PUBLIC of its advertising is what happens on the fields and courts of its Athletic Programs and that their overall performance is as much a reflection on the University as all of the medical, scientific, etc. research that is done elsewhere, I'm not going to have 100% confidence in any of the University's leadership to demand and hold accountable job performance in this area.

    I've decided I want to work for you. I'll hit my desk bottle all day and smoke dope with the IT guys and miss every deadline and target and you'll have my back.

    There is literally nobody shitty enough at their job for you to say so.
    Definitely disagree about that.

    There's a difference between what I'd do if I was in charge of making the decision on Woodward and what I think when looking at who is making the decisions on him.

    If it was me, Woodward's at best an average AD. His steadfast backing of Romar is barely explainable at this point. Romar's a nice guy that parlayed a few nice years into an entitlement/retirement package. He's gutted the program and I'm sure blamed it on a handful of people here/there that have since left the program. When I hear people say "we lost our culture and need to go back to it," that tells me that you got fat, happy, and lazy. Those aren't traits that you find in winners.

    Now, if you look at the track record of hiring from the University of Washington's perspective, it wouldn't shock me if they made a hire that was worse than what Woodward is. Which is why that gives me pause.

    Harry Dunn is your current AD, you think Lloyd Christmas can be any worse?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • wobidbuswobidbus Member Posts: 308
    Tequilla said:

    I'd say that I'd be 100% behind turning up heat on Woodward ... but until getting an idea of how the new UW President will view athletics, I'm not entirely sure that I would trust her to make an educated hire in that position until I see more from her. Given our recent hires, I'm optimistic that keeping somebody in house that actually views the University in the right frame instead of looking to either use the job as a stepping stone or resume booster will be right.

    However, and while I realize that the University has plenty of things to be proud of, until the University realizes that the MOST PUBLIC of its advertising is what happens in men's and women's crew and that their overall performance is as much a reflection on the University as all of the medical, scientific, etc. research that is done elsewhere, I'm not going to have 100% confidence in any of the University's leadership to demand and hold accountable job performance in this area.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • mobeymobey Member Posts: 3,254
    RaceBannon said:

    Tequilla said:

    I'd say that I'd be 100% behind turning up heat on Woodward ... but until getting an idea of how the new UW President will view athletics, I'm not entirely sure that I would trust her to make an educated hire in that position until I see more from her. Given our recent hires, I'm optimistic that keeping somebody in house that actually views the University in the right frame instead of looking to either use the job as a stepping stone or resume booster will be right.

    However, and while I realize that the University has plenty of things to be proud of, until the University realizes that the MOST PUBLIC of its advertising is what happens on the fields and courts of its Athletic Programs and that their overall performance is as much a reflection on the University as all of the medical, scientific, etc. research that is done elsewhere, I'm not going to have 100% confidence in any of the University's leadership to demand and hold accountable job performance in this area.

    I've decided I want to work for you. I'll hit my desk bottle all day and smoke dope with the IT guys and miss every deadline and target and you'll have my back.

    There is literally nobody shitty enough at their job for you to say so.
    You make this sound unusual.

    WELCOME TO FUCKING SEATTLE
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WhiskeyDawgWhiskeyDawg Member Posts: 406
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Woodward's kid and Emmert's kid got married awhile back.

    W, JW

    I'm assuming it a gay wedding.
    Now if there was going to be a thread about licking taint, this would be the one.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.