Petersen's post game comments...
"Stanford is the best team in the conference, no question and Palo Alto is a tough place to play, no question. No excuses on how we played. We just need to execute better. No question that McCaffrey is an amazing player, but we should have maybe keyed on him a little more. But then, you open yourself up to Hogan getting yards with his passing and running. Maybe we should have handed off the ball to Gaskin a few more times, but we felt that we had a good game plan on offense. We just have to execute the plays better. You have to realize that it's really hard to win a game with your starting quarterback being out. KJ just didn't get enough reps during the week to prepare for one of the best teams in the country."
Fuck! I'm sick of excuses, especially since the coaches' fucktardedness is painfully obvious.
Comments
-
Not enough "it's really hard."
-
Yeah I don't really give a shit. Sark's excuse clichés were amusing to a degree. I just want to fucking win and have some pride in this program. It does feel like it will never happen sometimes.
-
Unless Petersen kicks things off with, "Jonathan Smith is no longer the offensive coordinator" I don't want to hear any of it.
-
He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.
-
Better yet: "I have decided to step down as the head coach of the Washington Huskies football team. I just dismissed Jonathan Smith as the offensive coordinator. It's painfully obvious to me that I'm in over my head. I appreciate the opportunity that was given to me almost two years ago. But, as an honorable man, and for the good of the long-term success of this program, I must step down. That's all I have to say."Doog_de_Jour said:Unless Petersen kicks things off with, "Jonathan Smith is no longer the offensive coordinator" I don't want to hear any of it.
He gets up and leaves the presser. -
That would be amazing.PurpleBaze said:
Better yet: "I have decided to step down as the head coach of the Washington Huskies football team. I just dismissed Jonathan Smith as the offensive coordinator. It's painfully obvious to me that I'm in over my head. I appreciate the opportunity that was given to me almost two years ago. But, as an honorable man, and for the good of the long-term success of this program, I must step down. That's all I have to say."
He gets up and leaves the presser.
Hell, at this point I'd even settle if his pressers didn't include the words "youth", "hard", "difficult", or anything that praises the opposing coaching staff or players. -
No shit! I just want this grown-ass man to take responsibility as head coach. But then again, he knows his audience is a bunch of doogs and they'll buy all that shit.Doog_de_Jour said:
That would be amazing.
Hell, at this point I'd even settle if his pressers didn't include the words "youth", "hard", "difficult", or anything that praises the opposing coaching staff or players.
Actually, @Haid_D_Salaami just put up a scathing post on Facebook about Petersen. Of course, one of his doog friends jumps in there and talks about how this team lost a bunch of players to the NFL, etc.
Typical fucking doog... "I feel some of your frustration. But I'm not going to give up on Peterson just yet. We lost some quality players to the NFL after last season. Including underclassmen. And honestly, I look at the success the Cougs are having this season and all they have gone through. Peterson's going to turn this program around. I love my Dawgs and will continue to follow and support them. And yeah, we kick ass when it comes to Crew!!!" -
What coaches say publicly is not what they really think.DerekJohnson said:He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.
-
Shit! De Soto should have come to Washington. Who knew the fountain of youth was in MontlakeDerekJohnson said:He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.
-
that sounds way too much like ty....or maybe gilblobDerekJohnson said:He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.
-
CCP vs. ShawDerekJohnson said:He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.
4th and 3 vs. 4th and 14 inches.
Ready. Go.
-
You're thinking of De Leon.Dawgtona said:
Shit! De Soto should have come to Washington. Who knew the fountain of youth was in Montlake
De Soto was just after gold and shit.
-16th Century Explorers Superiority Guy. -
Has this team, and coaching staff - allegedly - reached the training wheels stage? This is exasperating.DerekJohnson said:He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.
-
Will he say the same thing when we lose to Utah, WSU, and OSU? They call can't be the best teams in the conference.PurpleBaze said:I don't give a shit about his presser, but this is probably how it's going to go.
"Stanford is the best team in the conference, no question and Palo Alto is a tough place to play, no question. No excuses on how we played. We just need to execute better. No question that McCaffrey is an amazing player, but we should have maybe keyed on him a little more. But then, you open yourself up to Hogan getting yards with his passing and running. Maybe we should have handed off the ball to Gaskin a few more times, but we felt that we had a good game plan on offense. We just have to execute the plays better. You have to realize that it's really hard to win a game with your starting quarterback being out. KJ just didn't get enough reps during the week to prepare for one of the best teams in the country."
Fuck! I'm sick of excuses, especially since the coaches' fucktardedness is painfully obvious. -
Utah best in the South. WSU wannabe best in the North. OSU who gives shit, except if we lose?
-
I am done with Coach Pete. Disengaging until further notice.
-
I love this bored after a loss.
-
TheGlove said:
I
lovehate this boredafter a losseveryday. -
But...but...who would you hire that's better? Huh? I'd like to see you be ADPurpleBaze said:
Better yet: "I have decided to step down as the head coach of the Washington Huskies football team. I just dismissed Jonathan Smith as the offensive coordinator. It's painfully obvious to me that I'm in over my head. I appreciate the opportunity that was given to me almost two years ago. But, as an honorable man, and for the good of the long-term success of this program, I must step down. That's all I have to say."
He gets up and leaves the presser. -
Race and Fremont and whoever else might be right. I'm just not going to invest a lot of time worrying about this stupid fucking team like I used to from Sunday through Friday. He's getting a few years unless he's caught with a little kid or strippers, and neither one of those scenarios is likely. I've already let this one go for the most part. Most (Some?) were wise enough to see through the 4-1 start in '06, 5-1 in 2011 after that loss to N, and 4-0 in 2013. Pick whatever third tier program you want - Kal, Arizona, Minnesota, Oregon State - that's us. Our peak is about 9-3 and a Sun Bowel. El Paso is special. We might be ranked 16th someday!!!!
-
You mention strippers like it's a bad thing. I think most of us, especially @Swaye, would have a lot more respect for Peterman if he was taint lickin' a bunch of strippers.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Race and Fremont and whoever else might be right. I'm just not going to invest a lot of time worrying about this stupid fucking team like I used to from Sunday through Friday. He's getting a few years unless he's caught with a little kid or strippers, and neither one of those scenarios is likely. I've already let this one go for the most part. Most (Some?) were wise enough to see through the 4-1 start in '06, 5-1 in 2011 after that loss to N, and 4-0 in 2013. Pick whatever third tier program you want - Kal, Arizona, Minnesota, Oregon State - that's us. Our peak is about 9-3 and a Sun Bowel. El Paso is special. We might be ranked 16th someday!!!!
-
Being ranked 16th would be a very, very big deal to many Doogs. I can hear them already talking about how UW hasn't been ranked that high in 16 years! Petersen would probably get a lifetime extension for a 10-3 team ranked 16th. This program sucks.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Race and Fremont and whoever else might be right. I'm just not going to invest a lot of time worrying about this stupid fucking team like I used to from Sunday through Friday. He's getting a few years unless he's caught with a little kid or strippers, and neither one of those scenarios is likely. I've already let this one go for the most part. Most (Some?) were wise enough to see through the 4-1 start in '06, 5-1 in 2011 after that loss to N, and 4-0 in 2013. Pick whatever third tier program you want - Kal, Arizona, Minnesota, Oregon State - that's us. Our peak is about 9-3 and a Sun Bowel. El Paso is special. We might be ranked 16th someday!!!!
-
-
What program have you all been watching, well, forever. This has never been the national program you all crave for. The closest we have ever been for more than three years would be from '77 - '84. '65-'76 was average to bad. '85-'89, very 8-4. '93-'99, average at best. If Peterman was able to deliver a top twenty program every year with a team that could compete for the P-12 every 3-4 I would love my family and myself again.
-
Sounds like you need perspective. LEAVE!theknowledge said:What program have you all been watching, well, forever. This has never been the national program you all crave for. The closest we have ever been for more than three years would be from '77 - '84. '65-'76 was average to bad. '85-'89, very 8-4. '93-'99, average at best. If Peterman was able to deliver a top twenty program every year with a team that could compete for the P-12 every 3-4 I would love my family and myself again.
-
Although I agree with your premise, you are cherry picking numbers to fit your narrative. We had a pretty good run from '89-'92. Coaches poll finishes at 20, 5, 1, 10. And yes, I'm cherry picking numbers to fit the contrary narrative.theknowledge said:What program have you all been watching, well, forever. This has never been the national program you all crave for. The closest we have ever been for more than three years would be from '77 - '84. '65-'76 was average to bad. '85-'89, very 8-4. '93-'99, average at best. If Peterman was able to deliver a top twenty program every year with a team that could compete for the P-12 every 3-4 I would love my family and myself again.
At the end of the day, though, the entitled, impetulant crowd has a clouded their view of our place in college football. I love their passion, but their expectations, especially this year, are misguided. -
lather rinse repeatHuskyInAZ said:
Although I agree with your premise, you are cherry picking numbers to fit your narrative. We had a pretty good run from '89-'92. Coaches poll finishes at 20, 5, 1, 10. And yes, I'm cherry picking numbers to fit the contrary narrative.
At the end of the day, though, the entitled, impetulant crowd has a clouded their view of our place in college football. I love their passion, but their expectations, especially from 2004 - 2015, are misguided.
doogs gotta doog
die in a fire
LEAVE -
"We thought we had a good game plan on offense."
-
Noone outside a handful of Doogs here and what's left of the posters on Dawgtran did either.DerekJohnson said:He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.
-
RaceBannon said:
