Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Petersen and Smith
RoadDawg55
Member Posts: 30,123
Petersen's comment awhile back about finding the best way to attack a defense left me shaking and vomiting. What's wrong with having a team that does the same thing every week? That's what the best offenses do. You know you have a shitty coaching staff when the head coach and OC talk about being more "stubborn" in the run game.
Jonathon Smith days after the Cal game : I think at times we could’ve been more stubborn in the run game as I look at it.
Petersen after the USC game : “I think we were a little more stubborn with it, just kinda kept sticking to it. We kinda made a decision to be more stubborn which I thought was a good decision because you have to give it a chance.
These assholes would never talk about being stubborn in the pass game. Using the word stubborn about running the football is nauseating. Doing what has worked is considered stubborn? Stubborn is sticking with your fucking horrible offense Petersen, even after it has sucked for four fucking years! Stubborn is still trying to be balanced when for the last three weeks we ran the ball well, but the passing game sucked.
I'm telling you, they might be polar opposites, but Pete and Sark both want, or in Sark's case wanted, to be seen as offensive geniuses with innovative schemes and play calling. Both have balanced offenses, but deep down they want to air it out.
Jonathon Smith days after the Cal game : I think at times we could’ve been more stubborn in the run game as I look at it.
Petersen after the USC game : “I think we were a little more stubborn with it, just kinda kept sticking to it. We kinda made a decision to be more stubborn which I thought was a good decision because you have to give it a chance.
These assholes would never talk about being stubborn in the pass game. Using the word stubborn about running the football is nauseating. Doing what has worked is considered stubborn? Stubborn is sticking with your fucking horrible offense Petersen, even after it has sucked for four fucking years! Stubborn is still trying to be balanced when for the last three weeks we ran the ball well, but the passing game sucked.
I'm telling you, they might be polar opposites, but Pete and Sark both want, or in Sark's case wanted, to be seen as offensive geniuses with innovative schemes and play calling. Both have balanced offenses, but deep down they want to air it out.
Comments
Agreed.
Ahead of only Wazzu.
Right behind USC.
Last year they were second to only Oregon.
No doubt youth will be used as an excuse to keep him.
In comes Rick who starts out 0-2 with his west coast shit offense. Scraps it for a running attack and wins a Rose Bowl. Can't wait to dump that and start throwing it all over so we can go 8-4 which at the time was a bad season.
Gilby was basically as fucked up as Petersen when it came to offense as a head coach. Uses the throw all this shit against the wall and see what sticks offense as long as we throw sideways instead of downfield.
Ty was another west coast offense puke. Sark was Sark, Road nailed both Sark and Pete - they want to be genius.
We just want to fucking win. If all those loser coaches with their loser offenses had worked then great. They didn't.
Neither is Petersen's. Fix it or get the fuck out
That sums up SmithFS
meh. blah. shrug.
Not only did the coaches set out a game plan that wasn't good, it was bad enough to highlight all the weaknesses while shutting down anything that worked.