An example...everything wrong with our munchkin OC in one sentence. One long, run-on, trying to say everything and it coming out incoherent sentence (just like his offense):
Practice, early introduction to SC here, and then also some fundamental work that we found we needed to do on Monday, after looking at ourselves for four games on Monday, we’ve worked on that as well as SC these last two practices.”
Funny thing is...I wasn't big on the Peterman hire, but I was wrong in part as to why. I thought he'd get the gimmicky offenses in and put up points, but I also thought that he wouldn't be able to change the culture or recruit that well, and he was dumb for bringing in a dumpster-fire of assistant coaches. The D coaches are fine, but the offensive coaches blow. Peterman never had to deal with that in his cushy BSU job, and I have my doubts he'll deal with it here before its too late (i.e. he should be laying the groundwork for an overhaul of the offensive coaching staff now). And if he doesn't, we'll flounder this year, struggle to a 7 win seasons the next couple of years and stay around 3rd or 4th in the Pac12 north until his BSU shiny wears off on the recruiting front and we start sinking again.
But maybe I'm wrong
BTW...why is the media such pussies that not a single one of them asks a simple question:
"Coach Pete...you've been here a season and a half. The defense and special teams have adapted well. On offense, it seems like your team has had the same struggles and explanations for them. At what point do you expect improvement, and if it doesn't improve by then do you think it goes to something deeper, either a fundamental problem with the offensive strategy itself or how that strategy is being coached?"
Wake up Jude or Caple...its the question everyone wants to ask. Put him on the spot...he gets paid enough for it.
An example...everything wrong with our munchkin OC in one sentence. One long, run-on, trying to say everything and it coming out incoherent sentence (just like his offense):
Practice, early introduction to SC here, and then also some fundamental work that we found we needed to do on Monday, after looking at ourselves for four games on Monday, we’ve worked on that as well as SC these last two practices.”
Funny thing is...I wasn't big on the Peterman hire, but I was wrong in part as to why. I thought he'd get the gimmicky offenses in and put up points, but I also thought that he wouldn't be able to change the culture or recruit that well, and he was dumb for bringing in a dumpster-fire of assistant coaches. The D coaches are fine, but the offensive coaches blow. Peterman never had to deal with that in his cushy BSU job, and I have my doubts he'll deal with it here before its too late (i.e. he should be laying the groundwork for an overhaul of the offensive coaching staff now). And if he doesn't, we'll flounder this year, struggle to a 7 win seasons the next couple of years and stay around 3rd or 4th in the Pac12 north until his BSU shiny wears off on the recruiting front and we start sinking again.
But maybe I'm wrong
BTW...why is the media such pussies that not a single one of them asks a simple question:
"Coach Pete...you've been here a season and a half. The defense and special teams have adapted well. On offense, it seems like your team has had the same struggles and explanations for them. At what point do you expect improvement, and if it doesn't improve by then do you think it goes to something deeper, either a fundamental problem with the offensive strategy itself or how that strategy is being coached?"
Wake up Jude or Caple...its the question everyone wants to ask. Put him on the spot...he gets paid enough for it.
According to Jude that is not the question everyone wants answered.
He had a bitch rant today on Twitter about the players not talking about sark when he asked them about him.
An example...everything wrong with our munchkin OC in one sentence. One long, run-on, trying to say everything and it coming out incoherent sentence (just like his offense):
Practice, early introduction to SC here, and then also some fundamental work that we found we needed to do on Monday, after looking at ourselves for four games on Monday, we’ve worked on that as well as SC these last two practices.”
Funny thing is...I wasn't big on the Peterman hire, but I was wrong in part as to why. I thought he'd get the gimmicky offenses in and put up points, but I also thought that he wouldn't be able to change the culture or recruit that well, and he was dumb for bringing in a dumpster-fire of assistant coaches. The D coaches are fine, but the offensive coaches blow. Peterman never had to deal with that in his cushy BSU job, and I have my doubts he'll deal with it here before its too late (i.e. he should be laying the groundwork for an overhaul of the offensive coaching staff now). And if he doesn't, we'll flounder this year, struggle to a 7 win seasons the next couple of years and stay around 3rd or 4th in the Pac12 north until his BSU shiny wears off on the recruiting front and we start sinking again.
But maybe I'm wrong
BTW...why is the media such pussies that not a single one of them asks a simple question:
"Coach Pete...you've been here a season and a half. The defense and special teams have adapted well. On offense, it seems like your team has had the same struggles and explanations for them. At what point do you expect improvement, and if it doesn't improve by then do you think it goes to something deeper, either a fundamental problem with the offensive strategy itself or how that strategy is being coached?"
Wake up Jude or Caple...its the question everyone wants to ask. Put him on the spot...he gets paid enough for it.
According to Jude that is not the question everyone wants answered.
He had a bitch rant today on Twitter about the players not talking about sark when he asked them about him.
Comments
An example...everything wrong with our munchkin OC in one sentence. One long, run-on, trying to say everything and it coming out incoherent sentence (just like his offense):
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/college/pac-12/university-of-washington/huskies-insider-blog/article37216608.html
Practice, early introduction to SC here, and then also some fundamental work that we found we needed to do on Monday, after looking at ourselves for four games on Monday, we’ve worked on that as well as SC these last two practices.”
Funny thing is...I wasn't big on the Peterman hire, but I was wrong in part as to why. I thought he'd get the gimmicky offenses in and put up points, but I also thought that he wouldn't be able to change the culture or recruit that well, and he was dumb for bringing in a dumpster-fire of assistant coaches. The D coaches are fine, but the offensive coaches blow. Peterman never had to deal with that in his cushy BSU job, and I have my doubts he'll deal with it here before its too late (i.e. he should be laying the groundwork for an overhaul of the offensive coaching staff now). And if he doesn't, we'll flounder this year, struggle to a 7 win seasons the next couple of years and stay around 3rd or 4th in the Pac12 north until his BSU shiny wears off on the recruiting front and we start sinking again.
But maybe I'm wrong
BTW...why is the media such pussies that not a single one of them asks a simple question:
"Coach Pete...you've been here a season and a half. The defense and special teams have adapted well. On offense, it seems like your team has had the same struggles and explanations for them. At what point do you expect improvement, and if it doesn't improve by then do you think it goes to something deeper, either a fundamental problem with the offensive strategy itself or how that strategy is being coached?"
Wake up Jude or Caple...its the question everyone wants to ask. Put him on the spot...he gets paid enough for it.
He had a bitch rant today on Twitter about the players not talking about sark when he asked them about him.
What a whiny whore that guy is. Fuck.