Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
How much would a real OC fix?
whatshouldicareabout
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,713 
Let's say Petersen fires Smith today and hires some OC that a majority of the non-doogs here find acceptable.
How much does that fix?
Are we suddenly natty contenders? Are we still 3rd in the Pac-12 North?
What is a realistic expectation of where we should be without Smith besides wins again BSU and Cal and being 4-0 at this point?
How much does that fix?
Are we suddenly natty contenders? Are we still 3rd in the Pac-12 North?
What is a realistic expectation of where we should be without Smith besides wins again BSU and Cal and being 4-0 at this point?
Comments
All games except maybe Utah would look winnable.
Young on offense, old on defense vice versa losers fucking lose and winners win.
I don't care how, they just fucking win. And it is the head coach who does it.
Has a Bill Belechick assistant ever done shit as a head coach?
Has Pete Carroll assistant done shit as a head coach?
Tormey was great under James and sucked donkey dick under Ty
Is it rash to give up on Petermen after 15 games? Uh sure... but you have to admit we have a lot of experience lately spotting shitty head coaches.
A great coach is rare. You keep firing until you get one. You don't makes excuses for mediocrity and give them more time.
Bunch of local kids UW and WSU gave the middle finger to destroying pretty much every defense they come across. They'd put up 20-30 on every SEC school. Granted there D would give up a ton, but still. . .
Throw in Smith's couch, and you got a Deal!
See more on Know Your Meme
My only worry for any OC is that Petersen will hire an OC that will stick with his schemes. I'm not sure what that would accomplish.
An example...everything wrong with our munchkin OC in one sentence. One long, run-on, trying to say everything and it coming out incoherent sentence (just like his offense):
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/college/pac-12/university-of-washington/huskies-insider-blog/article37216608.html
Practice, early introduction to SC here, and then also some fundamental work that we found we needed to do on Monday, after looking at ourselves for four games on Monday, we’ve worked on that as well as SC these last two practices.”
Funny thing is...I wasn't big on the Peterman hire, but I was wrong in part as to why. I thought he'd get the gimmicky offenses in and put up points, but I also thought that he wouldn't be able to change the culture or recruit that well, and he was dumb for bringing in a dumpster-fire of assistant coaches. The D coaches are fine, but the offensive coaches blow. Peterman never had to deal with that in his cushy BSU job, and I have my doubts he'll deal with it here before its too late (i.e. he should be laying the groundwork for an overhaul of the offensive coaching staff now). And if he doesn't, we'll flounder this year, struggle to a 7 win seasons the next couple of years and stay around 3rd or 4th in the Pac12 north until his BSU shiny wears off on the recruiting front and we start sinking again.
But maybe I'm wrong
BTW...why is the media such pussies that not a single one of them asks a simple question:
"Coach Pete...you've been here a season and a half. The defense and special teams have adapted well. On offense, it seems like your team has had the same struggles and explanations for them. At what point do you expect improvement, and if it doesn't improve by then do you think it goes to something deeper, either a fundamental problem with the offensive strategy itself or how that strategy is being coached?"
Wake up Jude or Caple...its the question everyone wants to ask. Put him on the spot...he gets paid enough for it.
An example...everything wrong with our munchkin OC in one sentence. One long, run-on, trying to say everything and it coming out incoherent sentence (just like his offense):
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/college/pac-12/university-of-washington/huskies-insider-blog/article37216608.html
Practice, early introduction to SC here, and then also some fundamental work that we found we needed to do on Monday, after looking at ourselves for four games on Monday, we’ve worked on that as well as SC these last two practices.”
Funny thing is...I wasn't big on the Peterman hire, but I was wrong in part as to why. I thought he'd get the gimmicky offenses in and put up points, but I also thought that he wouldn't be able to change the culture or recruit that well, and he was dumb for bringing in a dumpster-fire of assistant coaches. The D coaches are fine, but the offensive coaches blow. Peterman never had to deal with that in his cushy BSU job, and I have my doubts he'll deal with it here before its too late (i.e. he should be laying the groundwork for an overhaul of the offensive coaching staff now). And if he doesn't, we'll flounder this year, struggle to a 7 win seasons the next couple of years and stay around 3rd or 4th in the Pac12 north until his BSU shiny wears off on the recruiting front and we start sinking again.
But maybe I'm wrong
BTW...why is the media such pussies that not a single one of them asks a simple question:
"Coach Pete...you've been here a season and a half. The defense and special teams have adapted well. On offense, it seems like your team has had the same struggles and explanations for them. At what point do you expect improvement, and if it doesn't improve by then do you think it goes to something deeper, either a fundamental problem with the offensive strategy itself or how that strategy is being coached?"
Wake up Jude or Caple...its the question everyone wants to ask. Put him on the spot...he gets paid enough for it.
An example...everything wrong with our munchkin OC in one sentence. One long, run-on, trying to say everything and it coming out incoherent sentence (just like his offense):
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/college/pac-12/university-of-washington/huskies-insider-blog/article37216608.html
Practice, early introduction to SC here, and then also some fundamental work that we found we needed to do on Monday, after looking at ourselves for four games on Monday, we’ve worked on that as well as SC these last two practices.”
Funny thing is...I wasn't big on the Peterman hire, but I was wrong in part as to why. I thought he'd get the gimmicky offenses in and put up points, but I also thought that he wouldn't be able to change the culture or recruit that well, and he was dumb for bringing in a dumpster-fire of assistant coaches. The D coaches are fine, but the offensive coaches blow. Peterman never had to deal with that in his cushy BSU job, and I have my doubts he'll deal with it here before its too late (i.e. he should be laying the groundwork for an overhaul of the offensive coaching staff now). And if he doesn't, we'll flounder this year, struggle to a 7 win seasons the next couple of years and stay around 3rd or 4th in the Pac12 north until his BSU shiny wears off on the recruiting front and we start sinking again.
But maybe I'm wrong
BTW...why is the media such pussies that not a single one of them asks a simple question:
"Coach Pete...you've been here a season and a half. The defense and special teams have adapted well. On offense, it seems like your team has had the same struggles and explanations for them. At what point do you expect improvement, and if it doesn't improve by then do you think it goes to something deeper, either a fundamental problem with the offensive strategy itself or how that strategy is being coached?"
Wake up Jude or Caple...its the question everyone wants to ask. Put him on the spot...he gets paid enough for it.
An example...everything wrong with our munchkin OC in one sentence. One long, run-on, trying to say everything and it coming out incoherent sentence (just like his offense):
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/college/pac-12/university-of-washington/huskies-insider-blog/article37216608.html
Practice, early introduction to SC here, and then also some fundamental work that we found we needed to do on Monday, after looking at ourselves for four games on Monday, we’ve worked on that as well as SC these last two practices.”
Funny thing is...I wasn't big on the Peterman hire, but I was wrong in part as to why. I thought he'd get the gimmicky offenses in and put up points, but I also thought that he wouldn't be able to change the culture or recruit that well, and he was dumb for bringing in a dumpster-fire of assistant coaches. The D coaches are fine, but the offensive coaches blow. Peterman never had to deal with that in his cushy BSU job, and I have my doubts he'll deal with it here before its too late (i.e. he should be laying the groundwork for an overhaul of the offensive coaching staff now). And if he doesn't, we'll flounder this year, struggle to a 7 win seasons the next couple of years and stay around 3rd or 4th in the Pac12 north until his BSU shiny wears off on the recruiting front and we start sinking again.
But maybe I'm wrong
BTW...why is the media such pussies that not a single one of them asks a simple question:
"Coach Pete...you've been here a season and a half. The defense and special teams have adapted well. On offense, it seems like your team has had the same struggles and explanations for them. At what point do you expect improvement, and if it doesn't improve by then do you think it goes to something deeper, either a fundamental problem with the offensive strategy itself or how that strategy is being coached?"
Wake up Jude or Caple...its the question everyone wants to ask. Put him on the spot...he gets paid enough for it.