Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW coaching search & AD search

1356

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    TTJ said:

    It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.

    If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.

    It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
    Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.

    It brought UW 0-12.
    Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.

    What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.



    If it helps, I always want the coach fired.

    Who the fuck has Peterman beaten while coaching UW anyway?
  • PurpleReign
    PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,480
    Dawgman suppresses opposing viewpoints, this is the freedom forum, bitches!

    image
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737

    TTJ said:

    It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.

    If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.

    It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
    Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.

    It brought UW 0-12.
    Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.

    What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.



    So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.

    Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.

    Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,786 Founders Club
    jecornel said:

    TTJ said:

    It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.

    If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.

    It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
    Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.

    It brought UW 0-12.
    Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.

    What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.



    So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.

    Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.

    Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.

    This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,996

    jecornel said:

    TTJ said:

    It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.

    If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.

    It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
    Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.

    It brought UW 0-12.
    Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.

    What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.



    So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.

    Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.

    Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.

    This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
    Game management has been subpar
  • Muttzen
    Muttzen Member Posts: 1,015

    jecornel said:

    TTJ said:

    It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.

    If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.

    It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
    Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.

    It brought UW 0-12.
    Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.

    What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.



    So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.

    Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.

    Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.

    This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
    Utah State
    Sac State
    Georgia State
    Illinois
    Hawaii
    EWU
    Cal
    WSU
    OSU
    Colorado
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737

    jecornel said:

    TTJ said:

    It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.

    If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.

    It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
    Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.

    It brought UW 0-12.
    Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.

    What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.



    So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.

    Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.

    Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.

    This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
    Game management has been subpar
    At best
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Muttzen said:

    jecornel said:

    TTJ said:

    It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.

    If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.

    It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
    Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.

    It brought UW 0-12.
    Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.

    What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.



    So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.

    Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.

    Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.

    This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
    Utah State
    Sac State
    Georgia State
    Illinois
    Hawaii
    EWU
    Cal
    WSU
    OSU
    Colorado
    Zero teams with a winning record in FBS.

    But how is Peterman a mediocre coach?
  • Thump
    Thump Member Posts: 793
    What has Petersen done since 2012? The wheels were falling off at Boise State in 2013, and so he jumped ship to UW in 2014.

    His coaching staffs at Boise State were being plundered by schools with more money (Texas, Florida, ND), which shouldn't be as big a problem here but how the fuck did we end up with Montana's OC as our OC?

    Hell, even Utah, which is known to have coordinator salary problems, has a better OC.

    Is Petersen just unfamiliar with how to fire a coordinator, because all of his other ones were hired away?