It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
If it helps, I always want the coach fired.
Who the fuck has Peterman beaten while coaching UW anyway?
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
Utah State Sac State Georgia State Illinois Hawaii EWU Cal WSU OSU Colorado
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
Utah State Sac State Georgia State Illinois Hawaii EWU Cal WSU OSU Colorado
What has Petersen done since 2012? The wheels were falling off at Boise State in 2013, and so he jumped ship to UW in 2014.
His coaching staffs at Boise State were being plundered by schools with more money (Texas, Florida, ND), which shouldn't be as big a problem here but how the fuck did we end up with Montana's OC as our OC?
Hell, even Utah, which is known to have coordinator salary problems, has a better OC.
Is Petersen just unfamiliar with how to fire a coordinator, because all of his other ones were hired away?
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
Game management has been subpar
At best
Just a suggestion...you guys have enough material to keep you up past Jimmy's bedtime. You might wanna break that thing up into 2 one hour segments, Monday and Tuesday. Can't wait for this week's pod.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
Utah State Sac State Georgia State Illinois Hawaii EWU Cal WSU OSU Colorado
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.
It brought UW 0-12.
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?
Game management has been subpar
At best
Just a suggestion...you guys have enough material to keep you up past Jimmy's bedtime. You might wanna break that thing up into 2 one hour segments, Monday and Tuesday. Can't wait for this week's pod.
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
This is kind of true, but the offensive philosophy sucks and there is way too much cutesy bullshit going on. Right now, we should be an 8-9 win team, but Petersen is holding it back with his offense. So when the players improve we will win 8-9 when we should be winning 11+.
Do you really think with our OL, wr corp and a true freshman qb this is a 8-9 win team?
There's a lot of truth that UW did a lot to not help itself in winning the game ...
Cal also did some really stupid shit as well to help keep us in the game ...
And while not excusing Petersen or Smith with this comment, but you get a lot of ups and downs with freshman ... UCLA is another great example. The highs will show you glimpses of what will come and the downs will leave you shaking your head.
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
This is kind of true, but the offensive philosophy sucks and there is way too much cutesy bullshit going on. Right now, we should be an 8-9 win team, but Petersen is holding it back with his offense. So when the players improve we will win 8-9 when we should be winning 11+.
Do you really think with Peterman and Co. this is a 8-9 win team?
Comments
Who the fuck has Peterman beaten while coaching UW anyway?
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
Sac State
Georgia State
Illinois
Hawaii
EWU
Cal
WSU
OSU
Colorado
But how is Peterman a mediocre coach?
His coaching staffs at Boise State were being plundered by schools with more money (Texas, Florida, ND), which shouldn't be as big a problem here but how the fuck did we end up with Montana's OC as our OC?
Hell, even Utah, which is known to have coordinator salary problems, has a better OC.
Is Petersen just unfamiliar with how to fire a coordinator, because all of his other ones were hired away?
We're 2-2. Had we tried to run it versus Utah State we would be 1-3.
Hope this helps.
Cal also did some really stupid shit as well to help keep us in the game ...
And while not excusing Petersen or Smith with this comment, but you get a lot of ups and downs with freshman ... UCLA is another great example. The highs will show you glimpses of what will come and the downs will leave you shaking your head.
Pics?