Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kam's couch back in living room

topdawgnc
topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
in NFL Talk
Kam is back.

TSISO
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • section_332
    section_332 Member Posts: 2,403
    Just in time for the mighty bears. Thank Allah
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,489 Founders Club
    Link?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,127 Founders Club
    Can't post a link when he saw it on KOMO passing by buttfuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,385 Founders Club
    I like to call him Skam Chancellor

    El Oh El
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    RaceBannon said:

    Can't post a link when he saw it on KOMO passing by buttfuck.

    Actually The Score App ... KOMO is so 1999
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,385 Founders Club
    topdawgnc said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Can't post a link when he saw it on KOMO passing by buttfuck.

    Actually The Score App ... KOMO is so 1999
    If we are going to bash Dr. Laura following the Husky football games then I am out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    edited September 2015
    Can't expect to beat the Bears without Kam.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    SteveInShelton said:

    That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.

    The defense is absolutely a problem.
    34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well.
    It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,104 Founders Club
    I like how everyone is shocked that the running game looks worse than expected even though they lost 2 interior lineman, traded for a non blocking tight end and Lynch is a year older.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section_332
    section_332 Member Posts: 2,403
    SteveInShelton said:

    That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.

    Agreed. 2 months to prepare for not having Kam also.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SteveInShelton
    SteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    dhdawg said:

    SteveInShelton said:

    That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.

    The defense is absolutely a problem.
    34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well.
    It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other

    You have a point there, the Rams game was a dreckfest. However, giving up 24 (not counting the last FG after the stupid INT late in the game) to the Packers on the road is good.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,327 Standard Supporter
    SteveInShelton said:

    dhdawg said:

    SteveInShelton said:

    That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.

    The defense is absolutely a problem.
    34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well.
    It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other

    You have a point there, the Rams game was a dreckfest. However, giving up 24 (not counting the last FG after the stupid INT late in the game) to the Packers on the road is good.
    For the average team, 24 wasn't bad. For the Seahawks it sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleReign
    PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,480
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    His couch may be back but it's missing a whole lotta change from between the cushions.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    sarktastic said:

    His couch may be back but it's missing a whole lotta change from between the cushions.

    I would be the Hawks are making nice with him ... bet this was a net net for him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWerentThereMan
    UWerentThereMan Member Posts: 3,475
    Russell may have to learn how to execute the play as it is designed. That would help graham and everyone else.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter