That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
The defense is absolutely a problem. 34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well. It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other
I like how everyone is shocked that the running game looks worse than expected even though they lost 2 interior lineman, traded for a non blocking tight end and Lynch is a year older.
That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
Agreed. 2 months to prepare for not having Kam also.
That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
The defense is absolutely a problem. 34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well. It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other
You have a point there, the Rams game was a dreckfest. However, giving up 24 (not counting the last FG after the stupid INT late in the game) to the Packers on the road is good.
That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
The defense is absolutely a problem. 34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well. It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other
You have a point there, the Rams game was a dreckfest. However, giving up 24 (not counting the last FG after the stupid INT late in the game) to the Packers on the road is good.
For the average team, 24 wasn't bad. For the Seahawks it sucks.
Comments
El Oh El
34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well.
It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other