Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Facts only: The Pac-12 after week one
Average scoring margin versus other conferences:
versus the SWAC: +59.0 points per game
versus the Sun Belt: +49.0 points per game
versus the ACC: + 18.0 points per game
versus the Big Sky: +10.3 points per game
versus C-USA: +10.0 points per game
versus the Big Ten: -1.5 points per game
versus the Mountain West: -5.5 points per game
and last but certainly not least:
versus the SEC: -21.0 points per game
1 ·
Comments
Colorado is still horrible. That loss to HI isn't a shock. WSU's loss, while hilarious, hurts.
Kal, SC, UCLA all took care of business, as did the Utes.
Arizona didn't play great, but like I've said, UTSA isn't a pushover that one can just chalk up an auto 77-0 w.
Stanfraud looked bad on offense from what I saw. ASU kept up with aTm until the last few minutes. Both losses are disappointing , but aren't catastrophic or an indictment of conference strength either.
Hope this helps.
MSU over Ducks
Harbaugh over TheGlovesWhiteAmericaHelmetFuckingLosers
Rutgers over Coogs
All home games for b1g. I also think Nd looks primed to sweep SC/Stanford this year, or at least split.
The one reprieve is Cal looks set-up to blow out Texas, but who gives a fuck really, and they could always Kal it.
FagJ InlandEmpireBannon, and Sven will have a banner year. Cook it.
And still with how drecky the ACC looks, I still think an 11-2 Pac12 champ gets in the playoff. ND will fuck up somewhere along the way, and the ACC is worse than the pac12 if FSU isn't winning at a high level.
It's going to be very difficult for a two loss team from this dreckfest to get in.
Chavis looks like he was a great hire by #BlackSarkLivesMatter.
Don't think a conference would get a second team in over a 11-2 champ from the Pac12 (or ACC or ND). The committee clearly put a premium on conference champs last year. A 10-3 champ is maybe a different story, however.