It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.
It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.
SEC teams usually don't pay two FCS teams, but you Doogs hate facts.
If they don't play two FCS, they play a FCS and a total bottom feeder "FBS" like Western Kentucky Arkie State, some Tennesse directional college, North Texas etc. Hell, they often play two of those.
Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
Well, UW's schedule is # 18 of what 110? (using the biased SEC (ESPN) rankings that you seem to think are accurate).
I'll just take your statement above as PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU SPEAK OUT OF YOUR ASS.
BTW, believing that ESPN is unbiased in regards to ranking schedules and teams is akin to saying you would believe a similar ranking put out by the P12.
Look into that lobotomy. You are ENTIRELY WORTHLESS as far as logic goes.
BTW, I am done with you. I forgot the # 1 tenant for discussions. Never correct a stupid person. Always correct the smartest person in the room.
You, my fren, are too stupid to realize you are not smart.
My condolences.
If you want to make accusations out here, take responsibility for them. Sign your real name to them. If not, that's what gets deleted. Always have, always will. You don't get to trash people out here anonymously. Use your real name or don't do it.
It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.
It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.
SEC teams usually don't pay two FCS teams, but you Doogs hate facts.
If they don't play two FCS, they play a FCS and a total bottom feeder "FBS" like Western Kentucky Arkie State, some Tennesse directional college, North Texas etc. Hell, they often play two of those.
The SEC "dominance" is over. Let it go...
You mean like playing Eastern Washington AND Georgia State?
Get the fuck over this bullshit. Until UW steps up its scheduling again, we got nothing to say here.
It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.
It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.
They also like to schedule one of said FCS opponents in the middle of November, effectively padding their record and giving themselves a week off. The SEC being the best conference is a fucking myth.
Two middle of the road Big12 teams go into the might SEC and are among the league's best right away. 6-6 A&M in Big12 ('11) = 11-2 A&M in SEC West ('12). Missouri, an average at best team in the Big 12 has already won the SEC east a couple times. Washington State, the doormat of the PAC 12 almost went on the road and beat Auburn, who would go on to win the whole conference that season.
Did Utah or CU have the same effect in the PAC? Absolutely not, they were stepping up to a much better conference. It took Utah until last season to compete. Apparently going from the Big12 to the SEC is not really a step up at all.
Comments
The SEC "dominance" is over. Let it go...
If you want to make accusations out here, take responsibility for them. Sign your real name to them. If not, that's what gets deleted. Always have, always will. You don't get to trash people out here anonymously. Use your real name or don't do it.
Get the fuck over this bullshit. Until UW steps up its scheduling again, we got nothing to say here.
Two middle of the road Big12 teams go into the might SEC and are among the league's best right away. 6-6 A&M in Big12 ('11) = 11-2 A&M in SEC West ('12). Missouri, an average at best team in the Big 12 has already won the SEC east a couple times. Washington State, the doormat of the PAC 12 almost went on the road and beat Auburn, who would go on to win the whole conference that season.
Did Utah or CU have the same effect in the PAC? Absolutely not, they were stepping up to a much better conference. It took Utah until last season to compete. Apparently going from the Big12 to the SEC is not really a step up at all.