UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.
I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.
Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.
Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule like the PANSY ASS SEC.
Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.
I'll help Boobs here because he is struggling to put together a coherent thought. The biggest flaw in the methodology is that OOC results are nearly all that matter since conference
Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
Well, UW's schedule is # 18 of what 110? (using the biased SEC (ESPN) rankings that you seem to think are accurate).
I'll just take your statement above as PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU SPEAK OUT OF YOUR ASS.
BTW, believing that ESPN is unbiased in regards to ranking schedules and teams is akin to saying you would believe a similar ranking put out by the P12.
Look into that lobotomy. You are ENTIRELY WORTHLESS as far as logic goes.
BTW, I am done with you. I forgot the # 1 tenant for discussions. Never correct a stupid person. Always correct the smartest person in the room.
You, my fren, are too stupid to realize you are not smart.
UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.
I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.
Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.
Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule like the PANSY ASS SEC.
Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.
I'll help Boobs here because he is struggling to put together a coherent thought. The biggest flaw in the methodology is that OOC results are nearly all that matter since conference
Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
Well, UW's schedule is # 18 of what 110? (using the biased SEC (ESPN) rankings that you seem to think are accurate).
I'll just take your statement above as PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU SPEAK OUT OF YOUR ASS.
BTW, believing that ESPN is unbiased in regards to ranking schedules and teams is akin to saying you would believe a similar ranking put out by the P12.
Look into that lobotomy. You are ENTIRELY WORTHLESS as far as logic goes.
BTW, I am done with you. I forgot the # 1 tenant for discussions. Never correct a stupid person. Always correct the smartest person in the room.
You, my fren, are too stupid to realize you are not smart.
My condolences.
Are you saying ESPN is biased toward the SEC? Blasphemy!! Impossible!!!!
Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
Well, UW's schedule is # 18 of what 110? (using the biased SEC (ESPN) rankings that you seem to think are accurate).
I'll just take your statement above as PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU SPEAK OUT OF YOUR ASS.
BTW, believing that ESPN is unbiased in regards to ranking schedules and teams is akin to saying you would believe a similar ranking put out by the P12.
Look into that lobotomy. You are ENTIRELY WORTHLESS as far as logic goes.
BTW, I am done with you. I forgot the # 1 tenant for discussions. Never correct a stupid person. Always correct the smartest person in the room.
You, my fren, are too stupid to realize you are not smart.
My condolences.
Learn the difference between tenant and tenet then pop off about how smart you are.
It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.
It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.
It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.
It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.
SEC teams usually don't pay two FCS teams, but you Doogs hate facts.
Comments
WIth that said, the Pac 12 is the 2nd best conference in the country top to bottom and #3 isn't close.
Every conference has it's dreck. However the Pac has at least 7 decent teams that are capable of beating top 20 teams any weak.
You can't say that about Leaders and Legends, Little 12, nor the ACC.
Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.
Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule (consistently) like the PANSY ASS SEC.
Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.
I'll just take your statement above as PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU SPEAK OUT OF YOUR ASS.
BTW, believing that ESPN is unbiased in regards to ranking schedules and teams is akin to saying you would believe a similar ranking put out by the P12.
Look into that lobotomy. You are ENTIRELY WORTHLESS as far as logic goes.
BTW, I am done with you. I forgot the # 1 tenant for discussions. Never correct a stupid person. Always correct the smartest person in the room.
You, my fren, are too stupid to realize you are not smart.
My condolences.
It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.