Danny Shelton Tweets about Sark
Comments
-
What I don't get after having watching Pete Carroll in Seattle now and how he runs the team. Both Sark and Kiffen were given their jobs because Pete's recommendation to USC. How the fuck could neither of them learned anything from Carroll?bananasnblondes said:
Sark has absolutely no idea how things work in the real world. His coaching clusterfuck at SC may eclipse that of Kiffen's. Let's just hope he's not fired before it comes to fruitionHuskyJW said:Nothing brings respect to your organization when the team gets to punish the boss.
-
They did, they just learned the wrong thing. They gravitated to the Hollywood, celebrity culture that Pete embraced, but ignored the ultra competitive nature of PC. The only reason Pete can get away with the rah rah, players coach shit is because he's the hardest working, most competitive motherfucker in the business. That and he actually has a legitimate coaching specialty (defensive backs specifically and defense in general), and a phenomenal eye for talent.2001400ex said:
What I don't get after having watching Pete Carroll in Seattle now and how he runs the team. Both Sark and Kiffen were given their jobs because Pete's recommendation to USC. How the fuck could neither of them learned anything from Carroll?bananasnblondes said:
Sark has absolutely no idea how things work in the real world. His coaching clusterfuck at SC may eclipse that of Kiffen's. Let's just hope he's not fired before it comes to fruitionHuskyJW said:Nothing brings respect to your organization when the team gets to punish the boss.
The high-energy, competitiveness and eye for talent are things you can't teach. The defensive coaching Sark and Lane didn't learn anything about because they're offensive guys. So they grabbed the one thing they could from Pete - let's have fun. It's also the one thing about Pete that won't work without all the others.
In related news, the Hooks are fucked when Pete retires and they inevitably hire one of his "proteges". -
In related news, the Hooks are fucked when Pete retires and they inevitably hire one of his "proteges".
Fortunately for the 12's, both Kiffin and Sark should be available.
-
If you are going to bash moobs, I am fucking out, brah.Swaye said:Can you imagine how much Sark's tits must have hurt after those up downs?
-
That was actually spot on. The only argument is the protégés, as 2 of them are head coaches in the NFL and both are clearly more accomplished already than Sark. The great thing. Both with cut their teeth in those cities, and one will replace Pete in Seattle.dnc said:
They did, they just learned the wrong thing. They gravitated to the Hollywood, celebrity culture that Pete embraced, but ignored the ultra competitive nature of PC. The only reason Pete can get away with the rah rah, players coach shit is because he's the hardest working, most competitive motherfucker in the business. That and he actually has a legitimate coaching specialty (defensive backs specifically and defense in general), and a phenomenal eye for talent.2001400ex said:
What I don't get after having watching Pete Carroll in Seattle now and how he runs the team. Both Sark and Kiffen were given their jobs because Pete's recommendation to USC. How the fuck could neither of them learned anything from Carroll?bananasnblondes said:
Sark has absolutely no idea how things work in the real world. His coaching clusterfuck at SC may eclipse that of Kiffen's. Let's just hope he's not fired before it comes to fruitionHuskyJW said:Nothing brings respect to your organization when the team gets to punish the boss.
The high-energy, competitiveness and eye for talent are things you can't teach. The defensive coaching Sark and Lane didn't learn anything about because they're offensive guys. So they grabbed the one thing they could from Pete - let's have fun. It's also the one thing about Pete that won't work without all the others.
In related news, the Hooks are fucked when Pete retires and they inevitably hire one of his "proteges". -
The obvious advantages Bradley and Quinn have over Sark is they are defensive coaches and may have gleaned a lot from PC on that side of the ball. Also they are not career Pete assistants so they have succeeded other places with non PC talent at their disposals.2001400ex said:
That was actually spot on. The only argument is the protégés, as 2 of them are head coaches in the NFL and both are clearly more accomplished already than Sark. The great thing. Both with cut their teeth in those cities, and one will replace Pete in Seattle.dnc said:
They did, they just learned the wrong thing. They gravitated to the Hollywood, celebrity culture that Pete embraced, but ignored the ultra competitive nature of PC. The only reason Pete can get away with the rah rah, players coach shit is because he's the hardest working, most competitive motherfucker in the business. That and he actually has a legitimate coaching specialty (defensive backs specifically and defense in general), and a phenomenal eye for talent.2001400ex said:
What I don't get after having watching Pete Carroll in Seattle now and how he runs the team. Both Sark and Kiffen were given their jobs because Pete's recommendation to USC. How the fuck could neither of them learned anything from Carroll?bananasnblondes said:
Sark has absolutely no idea how things work in the real world. His coaching clusterfuck at SC may eclipse that of Kiffen's. Let's just hope he's not fired before it comes to fruitionHuskyJW said:Nothing brings respect to your organization when the team gets to punish the boss.
The high-energy, competitiveness and eye for talent are things you can't teach. The defensive coaching Sark and Lane didn't learn anything about because they're offensive guys. So they grabbed the one thing they could from Pete - let's have fun. It's also the one thing about Pete that won't work without all the others.
In related news, the Hooks are fucked when Pete retires and they inevitably hire one of his "proteges".
But my guess is Richard is the replacement. -
dnc said:
The obvious advantages Bradley and Quinn have over Sark is they are defensive coaches and may have gleaned a lot from PC on that side of the ball. Also they are not career Pete assistants so they have succeeded other places with non PC talent at their disposals.2001400ex said:
That was actually spot on. The only argument is the protégés, as 2 of them are head coaches in the NFL and both are clearly more accomplished already than Sark. The great thing. Both with cut their teeth in those cities, and one will replace Pete in Seattle.dnc said:
They did, they just learned the wrong thing. They gravitated to the Hollywood, celebrity culture that Pete embraced, but ignored the ultra competitive nature of PC. The only reason Pete can get away with the rah rah, players coach shit is because he's the hardest working, most competitive motherfucker in the business. That and he actually has a legitimate coaching specialty (defensive backs specifically and defense in general), and a phenomenal eye for talent.2001400ex said:
What I don't get after having watching Pete Carroll in Seattle now and how he runs the team. Both Sark and Kiffen were given their jobs because Pete's recommendation to USC. How the fuck could neither of them learned anything from Carroll?bananasnblondes said:
Sark has absolutely no idea how things work in the real world. His coaching clusterfuck at SC may eclipse that of Kiffen's. Let's just hope he's not fired before it comes to fruitionHuskyJW said:Nothing brings respect to your organization when the team gets to punish the boss.
The high-energy, competitiveness and eye for talent are things you can't teach. The defensive coaching Sark and Lane didn't learn anything about because they're offensive guys. So they grabbed the one thing they could from Pete - let's have fun. It's also the one thing about Pete that won't work without all the others.
In related news, the Hooks are fucked when Pete retires and they inevitably hire one of his "proteges".
But my guess is Bevell is the replacement. -
Fuck Bevell. I think I just shit the bed thinking about it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:dnc said:
The obvious advantages Bradley and Quinn have over Sark is they are defensive coaches and may have gleaned a lot from PC on that side of the ball. Also they are not career Pete assistants so they have succeeded other places with non PC talent at their disposals.2001400ex said:
That was actually spot on. The only argument is the protégés, as 2 of them are head coaches in the NFL and both are clearly more accomplished already than Sark. The great thing. Both with cut their teeth in those cities, and one will replace Pete in Seattle.dnc said:
They did, they just learned the wrong thing. They gravitated to the Hollywood, celebrity culture that Pete embraced, but ignored the ultra competitive nature of PC. The only reason Pete can get away with the rah rah, players coach shit is because he's the hardest working, most competitive motherfucker in the business. That and he actually has a legitimate coaching specialty (defensive backs specifically and defense in general), and a phenomenal eye for talent.2001400ex said:
What I don't get after having watching Pete Carroll in Seattle now and how he runs the team. Both Sark and Kiffen were given their jobs because Pete's recommendation to USC. How the fuck could neither of them learned anything from Carroll?bananasnblondes said:
Sark has absolutely no idea how things work in the real world. His coaching clusterfuck at SC may eclipse that of Kiffen's. Let's just hope he's not fired before it comes to fruitionHuskyJW said:Nothing brings respect to your organization when the team gets to punish the boss.
The high-energy, competitiveness and eye for talent are things you can't teach. The defensive coaching Sark and Lane didn't learn anything about because they're offensive guys. So they grabbed the one thing they could from Pete - let's have fun. It's also the one thing about Pete that won't work without all the others.
In related news, the Hooks are fucked when Pete retires and they inevitably hire one of his "proteges".
But my guess is Bevell is the replacement. -
I know you're being sarcasmic, but they're going to hire a defensive coach to replace him.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The obvious advantages Bradley and Quinn have over Sark is they are defensive coaches and may have gleaned a lot from PC on that side of the ball. Also they are not career Pete assistants so they have succeeded other places with non PC talent at their disposals.
But my guess is Bevell is the replacement.
-
Great post, but I don't think it's entirely true about Kiffin. Kiffin isn't a good coach, but he's a serious football guy.dnc said:
They did, they just learned the wrong thing. They gravitated to the Hollywood, celebrity culture that Pete embraced, but ignored the ultra competitive nature of PC. The only reason Pete can get away with the rah rah, players coach shit is because he's the hardest working, most competitive motherfucker in the business. That and he actually has a legitimate coaching specialty (defensive backs specifically and defense in general), and a phenomenal eye for talent.2001400ex said:
What I don't get after having watching Pete Carroll in Seattle now and how he runs the team. Both Sark and Kiffen were given their jobs because Pete's recommendation to USC. How the fuck could neither of them learned anything from Carroll?bananasnblondes said:
Sark has absolutely no idea how things work in the real world. His coaching clusterfuck at SC may eclipse that of Kiffen's. Let's just hope he's not fired before it comes to fruitionHuskyJW said:Nothing brings respect to your organization when the team gets to punish the boss.
The high-energy, competitiveness and eye for talent are things you can't teach. The defensive coaching Sark and Lane didn't learn anything about because they're offensive guys. So they grabbed the one thing they could from Pete - let's have fun. It's also the one thing about Pete that won't work without all the others.
In related news, the Hooks are fucked when Pete retires and they inevitably hire one of his "proteges".




