Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

KG has spoken regarding Sark

To no one's surprise, KG, a raging alcoholic himself, has spoken out regarding the Sark fiasco. In a drunken ramble filled with spelling and grammatical errors, KG says that just because Sark likes to throw back a few more than the average guy, it doesn't mean he's stupid or that he's a bad coach. Plenty of successful people have been alcoholics (including the CEO himself) so it's okay. Nothing to see here.
«13

Comments

  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    How are the doogs digesting that?
  • RaccoonHarryRaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161

    To no one's surprise, KG, a raging alcoholic himself, has spoken out regarding the Sark fiasco. In a drunken ramble filled with spelling and grammatical errors, KG says that just because Sark likes to throw back a few more than the average guy, it doesn't mean he's stupid or that he's a bad coach. Plenty of successful people have been alcoholics (including the CEO himself) so it's okay. Nothing to see here.

    I'm guessing not that many of those "successful people" got up in front of a large group of people at a traditional event, including children, and tossed out f-bombs on their way to making a complete and utter fool of themselves. Or maybe at some point in time they all do.
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,082 Founders Club

    How are the doogs digesting swallowing that?

  • DardanusDardanus Member Posts: 2,623

    How are the doogs digesting swallowing deepthroating that?


  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622

    To no one's surprise, KG, a raging alcoholic himself, has spoken out regarding the Sark fiasco. In a drunken ramble filled with spelling and grammatical errors, KG says that just because Sark likes to throw back a few more than the average guy, it doesn't mean he's stupid or that he's a bad coach. Plenty of successful people have been alcoholics (including the CEO himself) so it's okay. Nothing to see here.

    Can you be an alcoholic if you drink only Zima and wine coolers?
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954
    Passion said:

    To no one's surprise, KG, a raging alcoholic himself, has spoken out regarding the Sark fiasco. In a drunken ramble filled with spelling and grammatical errors, KG says that just because Sark likes to throw back a few more than the average guy, it doesn't mean he's stupid or that he's a bad coach. Plenty of successful people have been alcoholics (including the CEO himself) so it's okay. Nothing to see here.

    Can you be an alcoholic if you drink only Zima and wine coolers?
    Yes if you describe the cabs that you drink as drinking like merlots.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    Great quote from the CEO

    Kim Grinolds wrote:Sark may be a lot of things, but he's not stupid. he may do stupid stuff, but he's not stupid.

    Another poster said he witnessed Sark being Sark firsthand at UW and had posted about it before on dawgman only to have his posts deleted. Turns out he was right.

    Kim shot back with "If you want to make accusations out here, take responsibility for them. Sign your real name to them. If not, that's what gets deleted. Always have, always will. You don't get to trash people out here anonymously. Use your real name or don't do it."


    The poster asked Kim if he would be allowed to post photographic evidence.

    Kim later followed up by telling the poster to put his contact info in the thread.

    Sincerely, "what I'm hearing".

    Kim should have axed @badapple for his real name.
    Deserved own thread, so I started one.
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    Great quote from the CEO

    Kim Grinolds wrote:Sark may be a lot of things, but he's not stupid. he may do stupid stuff, but he's not stupid.

    Another poster said he witnessed Sark being Sark firsthand at UW and had posted about it before on dawgman only to have his posts deleted. Turns out he was right.

    Kim shot back with "If you want to make accusations out here, take responsibility for them. Sign your real name to them. If not, that's what gets deleted. Always have, always will. You don't get to trash people out here anonymously. Use your real name or don't do it."


    The poster asked Kim if he would be allowed to post photographic evidence.

    Kim later followed up by telling the poster to put his contact info in the thread.

    I'm sure Hoss68 or whatever will be held to same.
    Hoss94*
Sign In or Register to comment.