Ted Miller FS
Comments
-
You gave ASU waaaaaaaaaaay too much credit.PurpleJ said:Here's how I see the games in this hypothetical bullshit:
Alabama 31
Oregon 20
Auburn 69
USC -0
UCLA 31
Georgia 28
LSU 41
ASU 30
Ole Miss 21
Stanford 17
Arkansas 35
Arizona 14
Utah 24
Missouri 14 -
I agree Bamama would beat Oregon because Oregon does not have a defensive coordinator. But I'm almost certain that Oregin would hang more than 20 on any team in the vaunted SeC.PurpleJ said:Here's how I see the games in this hypothetical bullshit:
Alabama 31
Oregon 20
Auburn 69
USC -0
UCLA 31
Georgia 28
LSU 41
ASU 30
Ole Miss 21
Stanford 17
Arkansas 35
Arizona 14
Utah 24
Missouri 14
Interested to see what effect kaumatule will have. Supposed to be the second coming of haloti ngata. Yeah they still have Buckner but they were not getting to the Qb yesterday. I think they have talent at. Corner but they are overall thin in the d backfield. Oregin needs a stout d line if they want to make any kind of run. The kid is supposed to be a monster and d1 ready. I expected to see him yesterday. -
Did you watch the Bama game?creepycoug said:
I agree Bamama would beat Oregon because Oregon does not have a defensive coordinator. But I'm almost certain that Oregin would hang more than 20 on any team in the vaunted SeC.PurpleJ said:Here's how I see the games in this hypothetical bullshit:
Alabama 31
Oregon 20
Auburn 69
USC -0
UCLA 31
Georgia 28
LSU 41
ASU 30
Ole Miss 21
Stanford 17
Arkansas 35
Arizona 14
Utah 24
Missouri 14
Interested to see what effect kaumatule will have. Supposed to be the second coming of haloti ngata. Yeah they still have Buckner but they were not getting to the Qb yesterday. I think they have talent at. Corner but they are overall thin in the d backfield. Oregin needs a stout d line if they want to make any kind of run. The kid is supposed to be a monster and d1 ready. I expected to see him yesterday.
-
No. Just the recap. Doesn't matter. I get it. Bama has a stout defense blah blah blah. Oregon did better than 20 against LSU with the honey badger and against a pretty damn good Msu defense last year and could have hung 80 on fsu.PurpleJ said:
Did you watch the Bama game?creepycoug said:
I agree Bamama would beat Oregon because Oregon does not have a defensive coordinator. But I'm almost certain that Oregin would hang more than 20 on any team in the vaunted SeC.PurpleJ said:Here's how I see the games in this hypothetical bullshit:
Alabama 31
Oregon 20
Auburn 69
USC -0
UCLA 31
Georgia 28
LSU 41
ASU 30
Ole Miss 21
Stanford 17
Arkansas 35
Arizona 14
Utah 24
Missouri 14
Interested to see what effect kaumatule will have. Supposed to be the second coming of haloti ngata. Yeah they still have Buckner but they were not getting to the Qb yesterday. I think they have talent at. Corner but they are overall thin in the d backfield. Oregin needs a stout d line if they want to make any kind of run. The kid is supposed to be a monster and d1 ready. I expected to see him yesterday.
Don't get it twisted: I dont think Oregon wins or even threatens but 20 pts is nothing for that offense no matter who they're playing. I'm just challenging your score not the outcome.
I don't think bamers could repeat what osu did, which also involved some unforced individual bad play by Oregons skill players. Uncovered Dummy dropping the ball at the three Yard line alone makes it 27. With Addison back they are going to score. -
Bama has more than one Joey
-
42 -35. Bamers rbs, combined, barely broke a Hundy. There are arguments out there to get you where you want to go. I don't think this is one of them.Southerndawg said:Bama has more than one Joey

Besides, Blake is good for at least three picks and five more super stupid plays, even against Oregon, and that alone likely gets the ducks two scores. And he doesn't have cooper to bail him out anymore.
Give me a break.
If osu plays bamers 10 times they likely start beating them progressively worse each time. Bama was a flawed team last season. At least make them them prove it out over three or so games before assuming they're indestructible. Osu just scored another TD against wisky to make it an even 100, so color me "wait and see" based on yesterday.
-
Bama's flaws are a lot more manageable than Oregon's flaws. HTHcreepycoug said:
42 -35. Bamers rbs, combined, barely broke a Hundy. There are arguments out there to get you where you want to go. I don't think this is one of them.Southerndawg said:Bama has more than one Joey

Besides, Blake is good for at least three picks and five more super stupid plays, even against Oregon, and that alone likely gets the ducks two scores. And he doesn't have cooper to bail him out anymore.
Give me a break.
If osu plays bamers 10 times they likely start beating them progressively worse each time. Bama was a flawed team last season. At least make them them prove it out over three or so games before assuming they're indestructible. Osu just scored another TD against wisky to make it an even 100, so color me "wait and see" based on yesterday. -
Fuck off and follow the thread. 20 pts is nothing for Oregon. The flaws you speak of are on the other side of the ball.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Bama's flaws are a lot more manageable than Oregon's flaws. HTHcreepycoug said:
42 -35. Bamers rbs, combined, barely broke a Hundy. There are arguments out there to get you where you want to go. I don't think this is one of them.Southerndawg said:Bama has more than one Joey

Besides, Blake is good for at least three picks and five more super stupid plays, even against Oregon, and that alone likely gets the ducks two scores. And he doesn't have cooper to bail him out anymore.
Give me a break.
If osu plays bamers 10 times they likely start beating them progressively worse each time. Bama was a flawed team last season. At least make them them prove it out over three or so games before assuming they're indestructible. Osu just scored another TD against wisky to make it an even 100, so color me "wait and see" based on yesterday.
Hope that helps.
-
This thread is too shitty to follow now.creepycoug said:
Fuck off and follow the thread. 20 pts is nothing for Oregon. The flaws you speak of are on the other side of the ball.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Bama's flaws are a lot more manageable than Oregon's flaws. HTHcreepycoug said:
42 -35. Bamers rbs, combined, barely broke a Hundy. There are arguments out there to get you where you want to go. I don't think this is one of them.Southerndawg said:Bama has more than one Joey

Besides, Blake is good for at least three picks and five more super stupid plays, even against Oregon, and that alone likely gets the ducks two scores. And he doesn't have cooper to bail him out anymore.
Give me a break.
If osu plays bamers 10 times they likely start beating them progressively worse each time. Bama was a flawed team last season. At least make them them prove it out over three or so games before assuming they're indestructible. Osu just scored another TD against wisky to make it an even 100, so color me "wait and see" based on yesterday.
Hope that helps.


