Bama plays 2 ranked teams. That SEC sure is the almighty
Comments
-
The strength of schedule in the BCS formula already accounts for this. However, it uses CURRENT statistical data of ACTUAL games played rather than pre-season "let my cock fly" analysis. Which is in large part why it doesn't come out until the end of October.puppylove_sugarsteel said:At least USC beat up on 6-7 ranked teams a year, and pummeled good SEC teams in the process during a real dynasty. Satan wont get tested until he plays tOSU, who themselves will have only played 2 ranked teams all year. As usual an inferior and slow Buckeye team will take it up the ass by A red tide and the SEC will be crowned the best conference for eternity.
Meanwhile a very deserving and superior pac12 team, with an offense and defense, _will get to play a shitty Nebraska team in the rose bowl
Shut the fuck up Davey!!! -
agreed that they don't mean much in terms of being accurate predictors of the seasonTierbsHsotBoobs said:2013 preseason rankings are shit and you are shit for mentioning them.
Let's look at the results for 2012 instead, since there is actual data there
Alabama against the final 2012 AP top 25:
Beat Michigan (#24) on a neutral field 41-14.
Won @LSU (#14) 21-17.
Lost at home to aTm (T-5) 29-24.
Beat Georgia (T-5) 32-28 in the Georgia Dome.
Beat Notre Dame (#4) in the natty rather easily, say 42-14.
Summary: Alabama was 4-1 against the Top 25
Stanford against the final 2012 AP top 25:
Lost @Notre Dame (#4) 20-13.
Won at home against OS (#20) 27-23.
Won @Oregon (#2) 17-14.
Summary: Stanford was 2-1 against the Top 25 and lost at a shitty unranked Washington team 17-13.
The lessons, as always:
SEC champ > Pac-12 champ
PL_SSFuckingStupid hates facts
It does benefit certain conferences to have six of their teams in the top1513 though. They don't need to earn their way up as much, especially if they're out of conference schedule is weak. -
their
-
I am hoping for the field, and fast.CuntWaffle said:
Which one will kill me faster? I want that one.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FBA >>>> stage five ass cancerCuntWaffle said:
I actually meant full blown AIDS.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stage five ass cancer?CuntWaffle said:Excuse me while I go DIAF.
I saw that PL_SS made a thread about the SEC. I knew not to open it because it would probably make my cancer kill me faster... I still opened it and was right. -
Lets do it on field and stop whinning about SEC schedule, they have won how many in a row for a reason.
-
Reasons:
Reasons: Obese inbred hicks treat fball like a religion, a lot of brothas, and CBS and ESPN overpaid for SEC rights and try to recoup their $beelzebub said:Lets do it on field and stop whinning about SEC schedule, they have won how many in a row for a reason.
-
-
{logo}
{dashboard_link} {discussions_link} {activity_link} {inbox_link} {profile_link} {signinout_link}
{breadcrumbs}
{module name="MeModule" CssClass="FlyoutRight"} {asset name="Panel"}
{searchbox}
{asset name="Content"}
Powered by Vanilla {asset name="Foot"}
{event name="AfterBody"} -
What the fuck?
Does he plan on actually going behind Petersen's back and posting information about injuries? Is he planning that there'll be a certain time where he won't honor that policy and get everyone kicked out of practice? Does Jood realize there are a million better ways to write that line then to sound like a condescending and entitled fuck-up?
Then again, I bet you Jood is saving this as his last resort for when he doesn't want to cover practices anymore.
Hey whatshouldIwriteabout, you actually wrote about something for the first time. However I think it's just nitpicking about semantics, moreover you're reading and writing into nothing. Sheesh you can find faults in everthing, everyone if you try hard enough (except steelheader of course). Kudos for trying something new. Xoxo, lol, diaff, ROTFL, ROTC,
-
@beelzebub was right?beelzebub said:Lets do it on field and stop whinning about SEC schedule, they have won how many in a row for a reason.
HOLY SHIT, @beelzebub WAS RIGHT!
