Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Obamacare cost jobs?

2»

Comments

  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    That's your response?

    Tell me which part you were too stupid to comprehend, and I'll try to rephrase it for you.
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    edited August 2015

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    All that chart shows, is that as the economy improved from 07 to 09, more people in general went back to work. And as more people return to work, that will naturally increase the number of people in all categories of hours per week.

    Again, if you can't find a better job with better hours, improve your skills. It isn't Obama's fault that you didn't pay attention in school and dropped out or graduated with a PolySci degree.

    Funny...its 2015 now.


    And you still haven't found a better job?

    What skills do you have for which you can't find work?

    There are a lot of full time job openings out there if you have the skills.
    Which is funny because the Democratic Party gets a lot of their votes from people without these skills you love to talk about.
    And yet... you guys are the ones crying here that you can't find full time work. And that you think it's Obama's fault.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    All that chart shows, is that as the economy improved from 07 to 09, more people in general went back to work. And as more people return to work, that will naturally increase the number of people in all categories of hours per week.

    Again, if you can't find a better job with better hours, improve your skills. It isn't Obama's fault that you didn't pay attention in school and dropped out or graduated with a PolySci degree.

    Funny...its 2015 now.


    And you still haven't found a better job?

    What skills do you have for which you can't find work?

    There are a lot of full time job openings out there if you have the skills.
    Which is funny because the Democratic Party gets a lot of their votes from people without these skills you love to talk about.
    And yet... you guys are the ones crying here that you can't find full time work. And that you think it's Obama's fault.
    image
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,778 Founders Club
    edited August 2015
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    All that chart shows, is that as the economy improved from 07 to 09, more people in general went back to work. And as more people return to work, that will naturally increase the number of people in all categories of hours per week.

    Again, if you can't find a better job with better hours, improve your skills. It isn't Obama's fault that you didn't pay attention in school and dropped out or graduated with a PolySci degree.

    Funny...its 2015 now.


    And you still haven't found a better job?

    What skills do you have for which you can't find work?

    There are a lot of full time job openings out there if you have the skills.
    Which is funny because the Democratic Party gets a lot of their votes from people without these skills you love to talk about.
    And yet... you guys are the ones crying here that you can't find full time work. And that you think it's Obama's fault.
    Cracks me up every time you say this shit when half your state and 81% of your alma mater are serving my table and making my coffee in Portland/Vancouver.

    But OZONE from little old McMinnville with his Econ degree is sure showing me what real job skills are. Pretty sure white people are doing just fine in the job market, I know I am. Doesn't mean I can't point out fucktarded economic policies when I see them.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    I should expect a moron like you not to be able to understand how to use the govt website.

    I'll give you instructions:
    1) Click here: bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab7.htm
    2) Under "Women", click the box for "Foreign born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    3) Under "Women", click the box for "Native born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    4) Click the button "Retrieve Data"

    Article claim: "Jobs shock: 100% of female employment gains taken by foreigners since 2007"

    Foreign Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 9041, July 2015 10028

    Native Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 59332, July 2015 59258


    Whooo..hoo...part time is down, what 5%/yearly from 2013 so now its only up 170% from pre-recession levels? But, 6 YEARS AFTER the end of the recession it can't be due to the policies put in place by Obama.

    Moron.


    Why would you use December 2007? That's the month the recession started. Let's use a more reasonable time. Try January 2009. It went from 57,911 to 59,258.

    Fuck you are stupid. But keep believing your news source that wasn't to use stats from before the recession. Which make zero sense.
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    haie said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    All that chart shows, is that as the economy improved from 07 to 09, more people in general went back to work. And as more people return to work, that will naturally increase the number of people in all categories of hours per week.

    Again, if you can't find a better job with better hours, improve your skills. It isn't Obama's fault that you didn't pay attention in school and dropped out or graduated with a PolySci degree.

    Funny...its 2015 now.


    And you still haven't found a better job?

    What skills do you have for which you can't find work?

    There are a lot of full time job openings out there if you have the skills.
    Which is funny because the Democratic Party gets a lot of their votes from people without these skills you love to talk about.
    And yet... you guys are the ones crying here that you can't find full time work. And that you think it's Obama's fault.
    Cracks me up every time you say this shit when half your state and 81% of your alma mater are serving my table and making my coffee in Portland/Vancouver.

    But OZONE from little old McMinnville with his Econ degree is sure showing me what real job skills are. Pretty sure white people are doing just fine in the job market, I know I am. Doesn't mean I can't point out fucktarded economic policies when I see them.
    You sure have an issue with Linfield.

    Did they turn you down?

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    OZONE said:

    haie said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    All that chart shows, is that as the economy improved from 07 to 09, more people in general went back to work. And as more people return to work, that will naturally increase the number of people in all categories of hours per week.

    Again, if you can't find a better job with better hours, improve your skills. It isn't Obama's fault that you didn't pay attention in school and dropped out or graduated with a PolySci degree.

    Funny...its 2015 now.


    And you still haven't found a better job?

    What skills do you have for which you can't find work?

    There are a lot of full time job openings out there if you have the skills.
    Which is funny because the Democratic Party gets a lot of their votes from people without these skills you love to talk about.
    And yet... you guys are the ones crying here that you can't find full time work. And that you think it's Obama's fault.
    Cracks me up every time you say this shit when half your state and 81% of your alma mater are serving my table and making my coffee in Portland/Vancouver.

    But OZONE from little old McMinnville with his Econ degree is sure showing me what real job skills are. Pretty sure white people are doing just fine in the job market, I know I am. Doesn't mean I can't point out fucktarded economic policies when I see them.
    You sure have an issue with Linfield.

    Did they turn you down?

    We had Linfield and Southern on this bored.

    HTH
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,778 Founders Club
    OZONE said:

    haie said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    All that chart shows, is that as the economy improved from 07 to 09, more people in general went back to work. And as more people return to work, that will naturally increase the number of people in all categories of hours per week.

    Again, if you can't find a better job with better hours, improve your skills. It isn't Obama's fault that you didn't pay attention in school and dropped out or graduated with a PolySci degree.

    Funny...its 2015 now.


    And you still haven't found a better job?

    What skills do you have for which you can't find work?

    There are a lot of full time job openings out there if you have the skills.
    Which is funny because the Democratic Party gets a lot of their votes from people without these skills you love to talk about.
    And yet... you guys are the ones crying here that you can't find full time work. And that you think it's Obama's fault.
    Cracks me up every time you say this shit when half your state and 81% of your alma mater are serving my table and making my coffee in Portland/Vancouver.

    But OZONE from little old McMinnville with his Econ degree is sure showing me what real job skills are. Pretty sure white people are doing just fine in the job market, I know I am. Doesn't mean I can't point out fucktarded economic policies when I see them.
    You sure have an issue with Linfield.

    Did they turn you down?

    Retards from my high school football team with 3.4's wouldn't even go there. But please, don't let me get in the way of your pretend liberal elitism.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    2001400ex said:

    I should expect a moron like you not to be able to understand how to use the govt website.

    I'll give you instructions:
    1) Click here: bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab7.htm
    2) Under "Women", click the box for "Foreign born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    3) Under "Women", click the box for "Native born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    4) Click the button "Retrieve Data"

    Article claim: "Jobs shock: 100% of female employment gains taken by foreigners since 2007"

    Foreign Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 9041, July 2015 10028

    Native Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 59332, July 2015 59258


    Whooo..hoo...part time is down, what 5%/yearly from 2013 so now its only up 170% from pre-recession levels? But, 6 YEARS AFTER the end of the recession it can't be due to the policies put in place by Obama.

    Moron.


    Why would you use December 2007? That's the month the recession started. Let's use a more reasonable time. Try January 2009. It went from 57,911 to 59,258.

    Fuck you are stupid. But keep believing your news source that wasn't to use stats from before the recession. Which make zero sense.
    Was it hard to read the first three or four times, or did you just not understand it until I had to point it out to you?

    And why would anyone use the last month before the recession to compare how 6 YEARS of "recovery" has been for American-born females. I wonder what the definition of RECOVERY means...

    God you are a dull one...I see why OZONE sticks up for you. Makes his freeway speed-limit IQ seem like Mensa in comparison. Two peas in a pod...

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    I should expect a moron like you not to be able to understand how to use the govt website.

    I'll give you instructions:
    1) Click here: bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab7.htm
    2) Under "Women", click the box for "Foreign born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    3) Under "Women", click the box for "Native born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    4) Click the button "Retrieve Data"

    Article claim: "Jobs shock: 100% of female employment gains taken by foreigners since 2007"

    Foreign Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 9041, July 2015 10028

    Native Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 59332, July 2015 59258


    Whooo..hoo...part time is down, what 5%/yearly from 2013 so now its only up 170% from pre-recession levels? But, 6 YEARS AFTER the end of the recession it can't be due to the policies put in place by Obama.

    Moron.


    Why would you use December 2007? That's the month the recession started. Let's use a more reasonable time. Try January 2009. It went from 57,911 to 59,258.

    Fuck you are stupid. But keep believing your news source that wasn't to use stats from before the recession. Which make zero sense.
    Was it hard to read the first three or four times, or did you just not understand it until I had to point it out to you?

    And why would anyone use the last month before the recession to compare how 6 YEARS of "recovery" has been for American-born females. I wonder what the definition of RECOVERY means...

    God you are a dull one...I see why OZONE sticks up for you. Makes his freeway speed-limit IQ seem like Mensa in comparison. Two peas in a pod...

    I have an 8th grade education, remember? So bear with me when sometimes I don't read everything. But I'm smart enough to know that blaming job losses prior to Obama being elected on Obama and calling it Obama's war on women is FS.

    Yes read up, that's what you did.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I should expect a moron like you not to be able to understand how to use the govt website.

    I'll give you instructions:
    1) Click here: bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab7.htm
    2) Under "Women", click the box for "Foreign born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    3) Under "Women", click the box for "Native born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    4) Click the button "Retrieve Data"

    Article claim: "Jobs shock: 100% of female employment gains taken by foreigners since 2007"

    Foreign Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 9041, July 2015 10028

    Native Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 59332, July 2015 59258


    Whooo..hoo...part time is down, what 5%/yearly from 2013 so now its only up 170% from pre-recession levels? But, 6 YEARS AFTER the end of the recession it can't be due to the policies put in place by Obama.

    Moron.


    Why would you use December 2007? That's the month the recession started. Let's use a more reasonable time. Try January 2009. It went from 57,911 to 59,258.

    Fuck you are stupid. But keep believing your news source that wasn't to use stats from before the recession. Which make zero sense.
    Was it hard to read the first three or four times, or did you just not understand it until I had to point it out to you?

    And why would anyone use the last month before the recession to compare how 6 YEARS of "recovery" has been for American-born females. I wonder what the definition of RECOVERY means...

    God you are a dull one...I see why OZONE sticks up for you. Makes his freeway speed-limit IQ seem like Mensa in comparison. Two peas in a pod...

    I have an 8th grade education, remember? So bear with me when sometimes I don't read everything. But I'm smart enough to know that blaming job losses prior to Obama being elected on Obama and calling it Obama's war on women is FS.

    Yes read up, that's what you did.
    Recovery: a return to a normal state of health, mind, or strength.

    I'm not blaming the losses. I'm blaming the lack of recovery after 6 years. Try and keep up next time.

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I should expect a moron like you not to be able to understand how to use the govt website.

    I'll give you instructions:
    1) Click here: bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab7.htm
    2) Under "Women", click the box for "Foreign born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    3) Under "Women", click the box for "Native born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    4) Click the button "Retrieve Data"

    Article claim: "Jobs shock: 100% of female employment gains taken by foreigners since 2007"

    Foreign Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 9041, July 2015 10028

    Native Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 59332, July 2015 59258


    Whooo..hoo...part time is down, what 5%/yearly from 2013 so now its only up 170% from pre-recession levels? But, 6 YEARS AFTER the end of the recession it can't be due to the policies put in place by Obama.

    Moron.


    Why would you use December 2007? That's the month the recession started. Let's use a more reasonable time. Try January 2009. It went from 57,911 to 59,258.

    Fuck you are stupid. But keep believing your news source that wasn't to use stats from before the recession. Which make zero sense.
    Was it hard to read the first three or four times, or did you just not understand it until I had to point it out to you?

    And why would anyone use the last month before the recession to compare how 6 YEARS of "recovery" has been for American-born females. I wonder what the definition of RECOVERY means...

    God you are a dull one...I see why OZONE sticks up for you. Makes his freeway speed-limit IQ seem like Mensa in comparison. Two peas in a pod...

    I have an 8th grade education, remember? So bear with me when sometimes I don't read everything. But I'm smart enough to know that blaming job losses prior to Obama being elected on Obama and calling it Obama's war on women is FS.

    Yes read up, that's what you did.
    Recovery: a return to a normal state of health, mind, or strength.

    I'm not blaming the losses. I'm blaming the lack of recovery after 6 years. Try and keep up next time.

    Then you should compare to 2000. We haven't had a good economy since then.

    Regardless, you stated it was Obama's war on women. Clearly you are fucktarded.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I should expect a moron like you not to be able to understand how to use the govt website.

    I'll give you instructions:
    1) Click here: bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab7.htm
    2) Under "Women", click the box for "Foreign born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    3) Under "Women", click the box for "Native born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    4) Click the button "Retrieve Data"

    Article claim: "Jobs shock: 100% of female employment gains taken by foreigners since 2007"

    Foreign Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 9041, July 2015 10028

    Native Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 59332, July 2015 59258


    Whooo..hoo...part time is down, what 5%/yearly from 2013 so now its only up 170% from pre-recession levels? But, 6 YEARS AFTER the end of the recession it can't be due to the policies put in place by Obama.

    Moron.


    Why would you use December 2007? That's the month the recession started. Let's use a more reasonable time. Try January 2009. It went from 57,911 to 59,258.

    Fuck you are stupid. But keep believing your news source that wasn't to use stats from before the recession. Which make zero sense.
    Was it hard to read the first three or four times, or did you just not understand it until I had to point it out to you?

    And why would anyone use the last month before the recession to compare how 6 YEARS of "recovery" has been for American-born females. I wonder what the definition of RECOVERY means...

    God you are a dull one...I see why OZONE sticks up for you. Makes his freeway speed-limit IQ seem like Mensa in comparison. Two peas in a pod...

    I have an 8th grade education, remember? So bear with me when sometimes I don't read everything. But I'm smart enough to know that blaming job losses prior to Obama being elected on Obama and calling it Obama's war on women is FS.

    Yes read up, that's what you did.
    Recovery: a return to a normal state of health, mind, or strength.

    I'm not blaming the losses. I'm blaming the lack of recovery after 6 years. Try and keep up next time.

    Then you should compare to 2000. We haven't had a good economy since then.

    Regardless, you stated it was Obama's war on women. Clearly you are fucktarded.
    That's a broad stroke....the "but...but...Bush" response.

    They don't have the breakdown (that I'm aware of) by foreign-born and American born, but they have the totals:
    bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2012.pdf

    1999: 62,042 employed civilian females
    2007: 67,792 employed civilian females

    That's a gain of over 5 million for females alone between economic cycles. Why again did you want to bring this data up?

    Keep gurgling...
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I should expect a moron like you not to be able to understand how to use the govt website.

    I'll give you instructions:
    1) Click here: bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab7.htm
    2) Under "Women", click the box for "Foreign born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    3) Under "Women", click the box for "Native born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    4) Click the button "Retrieve Data"

    Article claim: "Jobs shock: 100% of female employment gains taken by foreigners since 2007"

    Foreign Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 9041, July 2015 10028

    Native Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 59332, July 2015 59258


    Whooo..hoo...part time is down, what 5%/yearly from 2013 so now its only up 170% from pre-recession levels? But, 6 YEARS AFTER the end of the recession it can't be due to the policies put in place by Obama.

    Moron.


    Why would you use December 2007? That's the month the recession started. Let's use a more reasonable time. Try January 2009. It went from 57,911 to 59,258.

    Fuck you are stupid. But keep believing your news source that wasn't to use stats from before the recession. Which make zero sense.
    Was it hard to read the first three or four times, or did you just not understand it until I had to point it out to you?

    And why would anyone use the last month before the recession to compare how 6 YEARS of "recovery" has been for American-born females. I wonder what the definition of RECOVERY means...

    God you are a dull one...I see why OZONE sticks up for you. Makes his freeway speed-limit IQ seem like Mensa in comparison. Two peas in a pod...

    I have an 8th grade education, remember? So bear with me when sometimes I don't read everything. But I'm smart enough to know that blaming job losses prior to Obama being elected on Obama and calling it Obama's war on women is FS.

    Yes read up, that's what you did.
    Recovery: a return to a normal state of health, mind, or strength.

    I'm not blaming the losses. I'm blaming the lack of recovery after 6 years. Try and keep up next time.

    Then you should compare to 2000. We haven't had a good economy since then.

    Regardless, you stated it was Obama's war on women. Clearly you are fucktarded.
    That's a broad stroke....the "but...but...Bush" response.

    They don't have the breakdown (that I'm aware of) by foreign-born and American born, but they have the totals:
    bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2012.pdf

    1999: 62,042 employed civilian females
    2007: 67,792 employed civilian females

    That's a gain of over 5 million for females alone between economic cycles. Why again did you want to bring this data up?

    Keep gurgling...
    Holy fuck you are stupid. You do know the recession started in 2001, not 1999, right? So you take the peak in 2007 to compare to now, then you use 2 years prior to the peak to compare to 2007.

    You are better than that. Oh wait.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I should expect a moron like you not to be able to understand how to use the govt website.

    I'll give you instructions:
    1) Click here: bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab7.htm
    2) Under "Women", click the box for "Foreign born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    3) Under "Women", click the box for "Native born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    4) Click the button "Retrieve Data"

    Article claim: "Jobs shock: 100% of female employment gains taken by foreigners since 2007"

    Foreign Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 9041, July 2015 10028

    Native Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 59332, July 2015 59258


    Whooo..hoo...part time is down, what 5%/yearly from 2013 so now its only up 170% from pre-recession levels? But, 6 YEARS AFTER the end of the recession it can't be due to the policies put in place by Obama.

    Moron.


    Why would you use December 2007? That's the month the recession started. Let's use a more reasonable time. Try January 2009. It went from 57,911 to 59,258.

    Fuck you are stupid. But keep believing your news source that wasn't to use stats from before the recession. Which make zero sense.
    Was it hard to read the first three or four times, or did you just not understand it until I had to point it out to you?

    And why would anyone use the last month before the recession to compare how 6 YEARS of "recovery" has been for American-born females. I wonder what the definition of RECOVERY means...

    God you are a dull one...I see why OZONE sticks up for you. Makes his freeway speed-limit IQ seem like Mensa in comparison. Two peas in a pod...

    I have an 8th grade education, remember? So bear with me when sometimes I don't read everything. But I'm smart enough to know that blaming job losses prior to Obama being elected on Obama and calling it Obama's war on women is FS.

    Yes read up, that's what you did.
    Recovery: a return to a normal state of health, mind, or strength.

    I'm not blaming the losses. I'm blaming the lack of recovery after 6 years. Try and keep up next time.

    Then you should compare to 2000. We haven't had a good economy since then.

    Regardless, you stated it was Obama's war on women. Clearly you are fucktarded.
    That's a broad stroke....the "but...but...Bush" response.

    They don't have the breakdown (that I'm aware of) by foreign-born and American born, but they have the totals:
    bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2012.pdf

    1999: 62,042 employed civilian females
    2007: 67,792 employed civilian females

    That's a gain of over 5 million for females alone between economic cycles. Why again did you want to bring this data up?

    Keep gurgling...
    Holy fuck you are stupid. You do know the recession started in 2001, not 1999, right? So you take the peak in 2007 to compare to now, then you use 2 years prior to the peak to compare to 2007.

    You are better than that. Oh wait.
    To make you feel better:
    1999: 62,042 employed civilian females
    2000: 63,586 employed civilian females
    2001: 63,737 employed civilian females

    2007: 67,792 employed civilian females
    2008: 67,876 employed civilian females

    Pick whatever group makes you feel warm at night...they still destroy Obama's shitty record.

    Keep gurgling moron...
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I should expect a moron like you not to be able to understand how to use the govt website.

    I'll give you instructions:
    1) Click here: bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab7.htm
    2) Under "Women", click the box for "Foreign born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    3) Under "Women", click the box for "Native born, 16 years and over" -> "Civilian noninstitutional population" -> "Employed"
    4) Click the button "Retrieve Data"

    Article claim: "Jobs shock: 100% of female employment gains taken by foreigners since 2007"

    Foreign Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 9041, July 2015 10028

    Native Born Female Workers:
    Dec 2007: 59332, July 2015 59258


    Whooo..hoo...part time is down, what 5%/yearly from 2013 so now its only up 170% from pre-recession levels? But, 6 YEARS AFTER the end of the recession it can't be due to the policies put in place by Obama.

    Moron.


    Why would you use December 2007? That's the month the recession started. Let's use a more reasonable time. Try January 2009. It went from 57,911 to 59,258.

    Fuck you are stupid. But keep believing your news source that wasn't to use stats from before the recession. Which make zero sense.
    Was it hard to read the first three or four times, or did you just not understand it until I had to point it out to you?

    And why would anyone use the last month before the recession to compare how 6 YEARS of "recovery" has been for American-born females. I wonder what the definition of RECOVERY means...

    God you are a dull one...I see why OZONE sticks up for you. Makes his freeway speed-limit IQ seem like Mensa in comparison. Two peas in a pod...

    I have an 8th grade education, remember? So bear with me when sometimes I don't read everything. But I'm smart enough to know that blaming job losses prior to Obama being elected on Obama and calling it Obama's war on women is FS.

    Yes read up, that's what you did.
    Recovery: a return to a normal state of health, mind, or strength.

    I'm not blaming the losses. I'm blaming the lack of recovery after 6 years. Try and keep up next time.

    Then you should compare to 2000. We haven't had a good economy since then.

    Regardless, you stated it was Obama's war on women. Clearly you are fucktarded.
    That's a broad stroke....the "but...but...Bush" response.

    They don't have the breakdown (that I'm aware of) by foreign-born and American born, but they have the totals:
    bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2012.pdf

    1999: 62,042 employed civilian females
    2007: 67,792 employed civilian females

    That's a gain of over 5 million for females alone between economic cycles. Why again did you want to bring this data up?

    Keep gurgling...
    Holy fuck you are stupid. You do know the recession started in 2001, not 1999, right? So you take the peak in 2007 to compare to now, then you use 2 years prior to the peak to compare to 2007.

    You are better than that. Oh wait.
    To make you feel better:
    1999: 62,042 employed civilian females
    2000: 63,586 employed civilian females
    2001: 63,737 employed civilian females

    2007: 67,792 employed civilian females
    2008: 67,876 employed civilian females

    Pick whatever group makes you feel warm at night...they still destroy Obama's shitty record.

    Keep gurgling moron...
    Ok but lets look at actual facts.

    Jan 1993 - 53,683
    Jan 2001 - 63,772
    Jan 2009 - 66,674
    July 2015 - 69,286

    photo Screenshot_2015-08-12-19-26-39_zps3o3ylzbz.png

    photo Screenshot_2015-08-12-19-26-43_zpsft4gkbf6.png

    In other words, Obama = Bush. But keep gurgling your fucked up news source that spews lies and misinformation.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    edited August 2015
    Selectively picking dates to make you feel better, all to come to the conclusion that in the best possible light Obama = Bush (not a high standard to start).

    This still ignores the original point which got your panties in a wad, which is Obama has a war on American women. After all, why are 50% (for your selectively chosen timeframe) to 100% (before the last recession to now) female jobs going to foreign-born females?

    Road sign IQ...its sad.


  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Selectively picking dates to make you feel better, all to come to the conclusion that in the best possible light Obama = Bush (not a high standard to start).

    This still ignores the original point which got your panties in a wad, which is Obama has a war on American women. After all, why are 50% (for your selectively chosen timeframe) to 100% (before the last recession to now) female jobs going to foreign-born females?

    Road sign IQ...its sad.


    You are not very observant. Look at those dates again. Fucktard. Check inauguration months.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    I didn't know the economic cycles managed to sync exactly with election cycles. Must be amazing on how they do that.

    And keep ignoring the original point. I would if I was you...you've got nothing to stand on.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    I didn't know the economic cycles managed to sync exactly with election cycles. Must be amazing on how they do that.

    And keep ignoring the original point. I would if I was you...you've got nothing to stand on.

    The original point? You mean the one where I discussed whether obamacare cost jobs and you got distracted with the shiny object over here about foreign born bitches. Where your news source lied to you.