Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

SI: USC Pac-12's Most Overrated

13

Comments

  • The_Undertaker
    The_Undertaker Member Posts: 521
    Doogles said:

    Nobody knew how bad Cyler was going to be. We simply couldn't move the sticks and the D gassed out.

    That is why I was struggling to make any prediction going into last season. We didn't know what we had at QB.
    We have seen so many times in college how a bad QB can be a disaster for a team that wouldn't be awful otherwise. Sark was a master at winning against these kind of teams by the way, better than us but where we were able to focus on their QB and let him hand us the game.
    Well last year we lost at the QB lottery.

    But in the same vein, I am not as pessimistic as the consensus seem to be for this year. We have seen what, 1 full game of Lindquist, Carter Samuel, and Browning combined, and we already know we are fucked? What if one of them is decent? That will make everybody else around him look better. He doesn't need to be Andrew Luck for that. Just decent. The likely scenario is he will get killed by his OL no matter what... but still.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,435 Standard Supporter
    During PAC 12 play the defense wasn't bad. Other than Oregon and UCLA they played well. The Eastern game completely fucked the overall stats.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,695 Founders Club
    RoadDawg55 said:

    During PAC 12 play the defense wasn't bad. Other than Oregon and UCLA they played well. The Eastern game completely fucked the overall stats.

    And the ending to the Arizona game made us forget how well they did against an offense that pretty much lit up everyone else. So did Cal
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    During PAC 12 play the defense wasn't bad. Other than Oregon and UCLA they played well. The Eastern game completely fucked the overall stats.

    And the ending to the Arizona game made us forget how well they did against an offense that pretty much lit up everyone else. So did Cal
    So it was a biased #97 ranking? Skewed? Abundance...?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Doogles said:

    I want a ranking that accounts for Timu's 5 pick 6 drops on the year.

    Yea but... 4 draft picks
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,175 Standard Supporter
    Like previously mentioned, qb play sucked. We really didn't know how bad that pothead was. We're used to good to great QB play at Warshington. There was a time 15 or 20 years ago when 3-5 were in the fucking NFL at once.

    If you inserted an average Pac 12 qb with an okay arm, you win at least one more gayme and likely two or possibly three. 8 + 2: 10. 10-4 was what many said....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    You've had good QBG play
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Like previously mentioned, qb play sucked. We really didn't know how bad that pothead was. We're used to good to great QB play at Warshington. There was a time 15 or 20 years ago when 3-5 were in the fucking NFL at once.

    If you inserted an average Pac 12 qb with an okay arm, you win at least one more gayme and likely two or possibly three. 8 + 2: 10. 10-4 was what many said....

    I'm gonna need to see actual good to great QB play within the last 15 years in Montlake.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter