Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

SI: USC Pac-12's Most Overrated

2»

Comments

  • The_UndertakerThe_Undertaker Member Posts: 521
    Doogles said:

    Nobody knew how bad Cyler was going to be. We simply couldn't move the sticks and the D gassed out.

    That is why I was struggling to make any prediction going into last season. We didn't know what we had at QB.
    We have seen so many times in college how a bad QB can be a disaster for a team that wouldn't be awful otherwise. Sark was a master at winning against these kind of teams by the way, better than us but where we were able to focus on their QB and let him hand us the game.
    Well last year we lost at the QB lottery.

    But in the same vein, I am not as pessimistic as the consensus seem to be for this year. We have seen what, 1 full game of Lindquist, Carter Samuel, and Browning combined, and we already know we are fucked? What if one of them is decent? That will make everybody else around him look better. He doesn't need to be Andrew Luck for that. Just decent. The likely scenario is he will get killed by his OL no matter what... but still.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    During PAC 12 play the defense wasn't bad. Other than Oregon and UCLA they played well. The Eastern game completely fucked the overall stats.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,207 Founders Club

    During PAC 12 play the defense wasn't bad. Other than Oregon and UCLA they played well. The Eastern game completely fucked the overall stats.

    And the ending to the Arizona game made us forget how well they did against an offense that pretty much lit up everyone else. So did Cal
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    During PAC 12 play the defense wasn't bad. Other than Oregon and UCLA they played well. The Eastern game completely fucked the overall stats.

    And the ending to the Arizona game made us forget how well they did against an offense that pretty much lit up everyone else. So did Cal
    So it was a biased #97 ranking? Skewed? Abundance...?
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Doogles said:

    I want a ranking that accounts for Timu's 5 pick 6 drops on the year.

    Yea but... 4 draft picks
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,644 Founders Club
    Like previously mentioned, qb play sucked. We really didn't know how bad that pothead was. We're used to good to great QB play at Warshington. There was a time 15 or 20 years ago when 3-5 were in the fucking NFL at once.

    If you inserted an average Pac 12 qb with an okay arm, you win at least one more gayme and likely two or possibly three. 8 + 2: 10. 10-4 was what many said....
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892
    You've had good QBG play

    Like previously mentioned, qb play sucked. We really didn't know how bad that pothead was. We're used to good to great QB play at Warshington. There was a time 15 or 20 years ago when 3-5 were in the fucking NFL at once.

    If you inserted an average Pac 12 qb with an okay arm, you win at least one more gayme and likely two or possibly three. 8 + 2: 10. 10-4 was what many said....

    I'm gonna need to see actual good to great QB play within the last 15 years in Montlake.
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Not only were the QBs we had awful. There was a HUGE drop off in running back and receiving corps.

    Sankey was one of the all time great backs here and Washington/Coleman were average at best last year. Losing ASJ (hes a lazy Sark baby fed player but he was huge and had pretty good hands), healthy Kasen, And Kevin Smith were big losses. I mean Mickens, Ross, 1st year Pettis/Lenius were garbage compared to the year before.

    Top this with Sarks horrible O Line recruiting and that offense was just a disaster from the get go. Jonathan Smith didn't help either.

    Our receiving corps will be a little bit better this year with the young guys having a year experience now and Mickens showing better flashes near the end. I still think the RB play will be the same (solid but nothing spectacular). It will all come down to the QB.
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,947 Swaye's Wigwam

    Not only were the QBs we had awful. There was a HUGE drop off in running back and receiving corps.

    Sankey was one of the all time great backs here and Washington/Coleman were average at best last year. Losing ASJ (hes a lazy Sark baby fed player but he was huge and had pretty good hands), healthy Kasen, And Kevin Smith were big losses. I mean Mickens, Ross, 1st year Pettis/Lenius were garbage compared to the year before.

    Top this with Sarks horrible O Line recruiting and that offense was just a disaster from the get go. Jonathan Smith didn't help either.

    Our receiving corps will be a little bit better this year with the young guys having a year experience now and Mickens showing better flashes near the end. I still think the RB play will be the same (solid but nothing spectacular). It will all come down to the QB.

    Makes me wonder how shitty the defense will be this year.
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    Not only were the QBs we had awful. There was a HUGE drop off in running back and receiving corps.

    Sankey was one of the all time great backs here and Washington/Coleman were average at best last year. Losing ASJ (hes a lazy Sark baby fed player but he was huge and had pretty good hands), healthy Kasen, And Kevin Smith were big losses. I mean Mickens, Ross, 1st year Pettis/Lenius were garbage compared to the year before.

    Top this with Sarks horrible O Line recruiting and that offense was just a disaster from the get go. Jonathan Smith didn't help either.

    Our receiving corps will be a little bit better this year with the young guys having a year experience now and Mickens showing better flashes near the end. I still think the RB play will be the same (solid but nothing spectacular). It will all come down to the QB.

    Makes me wonder how shitty the defense will be this year.
    What I'm hearing..... better than 97th without 4 early draft picks.
Sign In or Register to comment.