SI: USC Pac-12's Most Overrated

GrundleStiltzkin

http://twitter.com/si_ncaafb/status/629322967105802242

And UW steepest decline. FYFMFE

RaceBannon

The photo tells the story


why USC is the Pac-12's most overrated team.

PurpleJ

The people that think we struggle to stay bowl eligible make me laff. 8+ wins easy in our dreckfest division and ooc schedule.

PostGameOrangeSlices

PurpleJ said:

The people that think we struggle to stay bowl eligible make me laff. 8+ wins easy in our dreckfest division and ooc schedule.

This. Lindquist is the starter for two more years, leading us to the Rose Bowl next year, and Browning the starter for the following two/three years.

COOK IT

Swaye

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

PurpleJ said:

The people that think we struggle to stay bowl eligible make me laff. 8+ wins easy in our dreckfest division and ooc schedule.

This. Lindquist is the starter for two more years, leading us to the Rose Bowl next year, and Browning the starter for the following two/three years.

COOK IT

Meth is a terrible drug.

Alexis

PurpleJ said:

The people that think we struggle to stay bowl eligible make me laff. 8+ wins easy in our dreckfest division and ooc schedule.

Since ty made it look so fucking easy, people have forgotten how fucking difficult it actually is to lose 7 games in this day and age (at this altitude)

If Pete doesn't get this team bowel eligible with 2 games remaining, then he needs to roll around on the 50 yard line with Swaye's blankets.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Swaye said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

PurpleJ said:

The people that think we struggle to stay bowl eligible make me laff. 8+ wins easy in our dreckfest division and ooc schedule.

This. Lindquist is the starter for two more years, leading us to the Rose Bowl next year, and Browning the starter for the following two/three years.

COOK IT

Meth is a terrible drug.

It's more tolerable when mixed with benzos.

A fren told me that...

TierbsHsotBoobs

UW was 4-5 last year. How much worse than that will it get?

AZDuck

http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/10778/football-discussion-how-good-will-the-defense-be/p1

There are some fantastic threads from last summer.

Bored consensus was 10-12 wins. Peterman got 8.

The defense with FOUR ACTUAL DRAFT PICKS was 97th in the land.

Something isn't adding up in Washington State, and it isn't Vernon Adam's maff final

MisterEm

You're better than this.

4 draft picks + 2 true freshmen + 5 sisters of the poor (MAC talent) = 97th in the land.

Oh, this guy didn't help the defense much either. Quite effective on third down conversions with that motion.

AZDuck

MisterEm said:

You're better than this.

4 draft picks + 2 true freshmen + 5 sisters of the poor (MAC talent) = 97th in the land.

Oh, this guy didn't help the defense much either. Quite effective on third down conversions with that motion.

I don't disagree. But...

Doogles

Nobody knew how bad Cyler was going to be. We simply couldn't move the sticks and the D gassed out.

Swaye

Reading that thread makes me realize I am just a dumb fucking donkey and should stick to tit and fart jokes. FML.

PostGameOrangeSlices

AZDuck said:

MisterEm said:

You're better than this.

4 draft picks + 2 true freshmen + 5 sisters of the poor (MAC talent) = 97th in the land.

Oh, this guy didn't help the defense much either. Quite effective on third down conversions with that motion.

I don't disagree. But...

Fuck this program and my life

HeretoBeatmyChest

The defense was #51 in yards per play. When you adjust for how long it was on the field, how terrible the offense was and how many points the D itself scored, it was definitely a top 35/40 defense. Clearly worse than expected, but nowhere near 97.

Enjoy your regression this season.

AZDuck

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

The defense was #51 in yards per play. When you adjust for how long it was on the field, how terrible the offense was and how many points the D itself scored, it was definitely a top 35/40 defense. Clearly worse than expected, but nowhere near 97.

Enjoy your regression this season.

right click, save as

#78 in total defense
http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/22/p2

#120 in pass defense
http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/695/p3

The NCAA doesn't maintain the SRS stats, though

PostGameOrangeSlices

AZDuck said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

The defense was #51 in yards per play. When you adjust for how long it was on the field, how terrible the offense was and how many points the D itself scored, it was definitely a top 35/40 defense. Clearly worse than expected, but nowhere near 97.

Enjoy your regression this season.

right click, save as

Fuck off

Dardanus

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

AZDuck said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

The defense was #51 in yards per play. When you adjust for how long it was on the field, how terrible the offense was and how many points the D itself scored, it was definitely a top 35/40 defense. Clearly worse than expected, but nowhere near 97.

Enjoy your regression this season.

right click, save as

Fuck off

left click, save as

Gladstone

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

AZDuck said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

The defense was #51 in yards per play. When you adjust for how long it was on the field, how terrible the offense was and how many points the D itself scored, it was definitely a top 35/40 defense. Clearly worse than expected, but nowhere near 97.

Enjoy your regression this season.

right click, save as

Fuck off

Scroll wheel click, save as

RaceBannon

Why do you think we have the battered wife? We always end up feeling stupid for thinking we won't suck. Petermen caused irrational exuberance.

Now this year we expect nothing. And we'll get it!

AZDuck

RaceBannon said:

Why do you think we have the battered wife? We always end up feeling stupid for thinking we won't suck. Petermen caused irrational exuberance.

Now this year we expect nothing. And we'll get it!

I can find no fault with this poast