Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
David Long (2016 4* CB, Loyola CA)
Comments
-
I'm not saying we will get him, don't twist. I'm just saying—with the current variables—my crystal ball is 81% locked in for Murphy to Washington.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think we can McClatcher Murphy.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I hate Stanford.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?RoadDawg55 said:Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.
He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash. -
Dennis_DeYoung said:
I'm not saying we will get him, don't twist. I'm just saying—with the current variables—my crystal ball is 81% locked in for Murphy to Washington.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think we can McClatcher Murphy.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I hate Stanford.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?RoadDawg55 said:Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.
He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b-i0XknSnM -
God damn right!whatshouldicareabout said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
I'm not saying we will get him, don't twist. I'm just saying—with the current variables—my crystal ball is 81% locked in for Murphy to Washington.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think we can McClatcher Murphy.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I hate Stanford.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?RoadDawg55 said:Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.
He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b-i0XknSnM -
From what I saw elsewhere, Long tweeted he would be announcing and mentioned USC, Stanford, and UCLA in the tweet. Lars then asked him about UW and he said they are still in it. If he was picking UW, I don't think he would have forgotten to mention them in his tweet.
Ektard has been saying lately that UW is where Long wants to go but Stanford's education may pull him that way.
I don't see Murphy coming to UW but you never know. My guess is we get either Bryant or Gilchrist -
-
-
I would be more than fine with Gilchrist and Love. Both are solid prospects and they should be able to redshirt as long as the CB's on the roster don't transfer.
-
Yep:
Long > Stanford
Murphy > Texas Agriculture & Mining University
Love = DAWGS
Gilchrist = DAWGS
Myles Bryant > Powder Blue with cursive on their helemtsRoadDawg55 said:I would be more than fine with Gilchrist and Love. Both are solid prospects and they should be able to redshirt as long as the CB's on the roster don't transfer.
-
I'd be OK with that but your use of > and = is pissing me off in this postHFNY said:Yep:
Long > Stanford
Murphy > Texas Agriculture & Mining University
Love = DAWGS
Gilchrist = DAWGS
Myles Bryant > Powder Blue with cursive on their helemtsRoadDawg55 said:I would be more than fine with Gilchrist and Love. Both are solid prospects and they should be able to redshirt as long as the CB's on the roster don't transfer.
-
Insider info says we are looking good for Murph.
