Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«13

Comments

  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Ever hear of Stanford?
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,803

    Ever hear of Stanford?

    Stanford called...
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,735 Swaye's Wigwam
    I can never blame a kid who choo(ry
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
    I hate Stanford.

    Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
    I hate Stanford.

    Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
    I think we can McClatcher Murphy.

    I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
    I hate Stanford.

    Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
    I think we can McClatcher Murphy.

    I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
    If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.

    Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
    I hate Stanford.

    Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
    I think we can McClatcher Murphy.

    I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
    If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.

    Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash.
    I'm not saying we will get him, don't twist. I'm just saying—with the current variables—my crystal ball is 81% locked in for Murphy to Washington.
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,735 Swaye's Wigwam

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
    I hate Stanford.

    Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
    I think we can McClatcher Murphy.

    I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
    If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.

    Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash.
    I'm not saying we will get him, don't twist. I'm just saying—with the current variables—my crystal ball is 81% locked in for Murphy to Washington.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b-i0XknSnM
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
    I hate Stanford.

    Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
    I think we can McClatcher Murphy.

    I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
    If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.

    Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash.
    I'm not saying we will get him, don't twist. I'm just saying—with the current variables—my crystal ball is 81% locked in for Murphy to Washington.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b-i0XknSnM
    God damn right!
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,275
    From what I saw elsewhere, Long tweeted he would be announcing and mentioned USC, Stanford, and UCLA in the tweet. Lars then asked him about UW and he said they are still in it. If he was picking UW, I don't think he would have forgotten to mention them in his tweet.

    Ektard has been saying lately that UW is where Long wants to go but Stanford's education may pull him that way.

    I don't see Murphy coming to UW but you never know. My guess is we get either Bryant or Gilchrist
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    I would be more than fine with Gilchrist and Love. Both are solid prospects and they should be able to redshirt as long as the CB's on the roster don't transfer.
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,882 Standard Supporter
    Yep:

    Long > Stanford

    Murphy > Texas Agriculture & Mining University

    Love = DAWGS

    Gilchrist = DAWGS

    Myles Bryant > Powder Blue with cursive on their helemts

    I would be more than fine with Gilchrist and Love. Both are solid prospects and they should be able to redshirt as long as the CB's on the roster don't transfer.

  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Insider info says we are looking good for Murph.
Sign In or Register to comment.