Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
UW ranked in the preseason Coach's poll
Comments
-
Ohio State has more sole natties this century than the entire Pac has in my lifetime.BallSacked said:
3>6. 21% > 50% RaceBannonFFSRaceBannon said:
No so obvious to ballbagdnc said:
Big10 > PacDreckTierbsHsotBoobs said:
You mean like the Indiana game?HFNY said:Rick Neuheisel'sGary Pinkel's not walking through that door anytime soon
FIFYAlexis said:
Rick Neuheisel's not walking through that door anytime soonFire_Marshall_Bill said:I miss the days when we were automatically ranked 20th....in a down year.
(The first f is for fat) -
Cocaine off of a 400 pound stripper?GrundleStiltzkin said:
@IrishDawg22 died doing what he loved.dnc said:
huh?PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
-
Michigan is the winningest program in history, they're also likely to lose to both Utah and Oregon state this year.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Ohio State has more sole natties this century than the entire Pac has in my lifetime.BallSacked said:
3>6. 21% > 50% RaceBannonFFSRaceBannon said:
No so obvious to ballbagdnc said:
Big10 > PacDreckTierbsHsotBoobs said:
You mean like the Indiana game?HFNY said:Rick Neuheisel'sGary Pinkel's not walking through that door anytime soon
FIFYAlexis said:
Rick Neuheisel's not walking through that door anytime soonFire_Marshall_Bill said:I miss the days when we were automatically ranked 20th....in a down year.
(The first f is for fat)
Ohio State is great, their conference is shit. Just like SC & the Pac10 in the 2000s.
HTH, but it probably doesn't. At all. Quite honestly. -
Michigan is not losing at home to Oregon State...BallSacked said:
Michigan is the winningest program in history, they're also likely to lose to both Utah and Oregon state this year.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Ohio State has more sole natties this century than the entire Pac has in my lifetime.BallSacked said:
3>6. 21% > 50% RaceBannonFFSRaceBannon said:
No so obvious to ballbagdnc said:
Big10 > PacDreckTierbsHsotBoobs said:
You mean like the Indiana game?HFNY said:Rick Neuheisel'sGary Pinkel's not walking through that door anytime soon
FIFYAlexis said:
Rick Neuheisel's not walking through that door anytime soonFire_Marshall_Bill said:I miss the days when we were automatically ranked 20th....in a down year.
(The first f is for fat)
Ohio State is great, their conference is shit. Just like SC & the Pac10 in the 2000s.
HTH, but it probably doesn't. At all. Quite honestly. -
I wouldn't put it past them.RaccoonHarry said:
Michigan is not losing at home to Oregon State...BallSacked said:
Michigan is the winningest program in history, they're also likely to lose to both Utah and Oregon state this year.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Ohio State has more sole natties this century than the entire Pac has in my lifetime.BallSacked said:
3>6. 21% > 50% RaceBannonFFSRaceBannon said:
No so obvious to ballbagdnc said:
Big10 > PacDreckTierbsHsotBoobs said:
You mean like the Indiana game?HFNY said:Rick Neuheisel'sGary Pinkel's not walking through that door anytime soon
FIFYAlexis said:
Rick Neuheisel's not walking through that door anytime soonFire_Marshall_Bill said:I miss the days when we were automatically ranked 20th....in a down year.
(The first f is for fat)
Ohio State is great, their conference is shit. Just like SC & the Pac10 in the 2000s.
HTH, but it probably doesn't. At all. Quite honestly.
-
BallSacked said:
Michigan is the winningest program in history, they're also likely to lose to both Utah and Oregon state this year.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Ohio State has more sole natties this century than the entire Pac has in my lifetime.BallSacked said:
3>6. 21% > 50% RaceBannonFFSRaceBannon said:
No so obvious to ballbagdnc said:
Big10 > PacDreckTierbsHsotBoobs said:
You mean like the Indiana game?HFNY said:Rick Neuheisel'sGary Pinkel's not walking through that door anytime soon
FIFYAlexis said:
Rick Neuheisel's not walking through that door anytime soonFire_Marshall_Bill said:I miss the days when we were automatically ranked 20th....in a down year.
(The first f is for fat)
Ohio State is great, their conference is shit. Just like SC & the Pac10 in the past fifty years.
HTH, but it probably doesn't. At all. Quite honestly. -
Playing NCAA football on his Playstation?GrundleStiltzkin said:
@IrishDawg22 died doing what he loved.dnc said:
huh?PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
-
It's those skinny vegan health nuts that hang onto their last wisps of life for an extra 10 years that up healthcare costs.PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
Cholesterol and the diabetes are the only things saving our healthcare and social security systems. -
I miss that guy. He never really dialed me in, but those COW threads were right in my wheelhouse. I love me some big titted, heavy set women.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@IrishDawg22 died doing what he loved.dnc said:
huh?PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
-
I would love to read the casting call for that kid.SpoonieLuv said:Patohondo said:It's OK because you're .....young
“This is going to be young, really young. But I will say this – we really like the kids that we recruited last year. We like the guys that we’re bringing in this year that aren’t even here. They’re going to be good players. And we have some good players that are young (that were recruited) before we got here that maybe haven’t done a whole lot. We are a young team, but we’ll get there.”
"We need a hideously ugly 10-14 year old male. The more grotesque the better. If you think that is you, call Jeffrey at 1-888-casting or visit lacasting.com -
Dirty Opie. I believe Spade even calls him that in the film.RoadDawg55 said:
I would love to read the casting call for that kid.SpoonieLuv said:Patohondo said:It's OK because you're .....young
“This is going to be young, really young. But I will say this – we really like the kids that we recruited last year. We like the guys that we’re bringing in this year that aren’t even here. They’re going to be good players. And we have some good players that are young (that were recruited) before we got here that maybe haven’t done a whole lot. We are a young team, but we’ll get there.”
"We need a hideously ugly 10-14 year old male. The more grotesque the better. If you think that is you, call Jeffrey at 1-888-casting or visit lacasting.com -
I remember those days - "Oh shit, we're playing Washington next game. Damn!".Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I miss the days when we were automatically ranked 20th....in a down year.
-
I like to ignore the costs of care while they are still alive. I do that. That's like saying more people should smoke, because they die earlier.FremontTroll said:
It's those skinny vegan health nuts that hang onto their last wisps of life for an extra 10 years that up healthcare costs.PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
Cholesterol and the diabetes are the only things saving our healthcare and social security systems. -
You mean like the Uw/Illini gamednc said:
Big10 > PacDreckTierbsHsotBoobs said:
You mean like the Indiana game?HFNY said:Rick Neuheisel'sGary Pinkel's not walking through that door anytime soon
FIFYAlexis said:
Rick Neuheisel's not walking through that door anytime soonFire_Marshall_Bill said:I miss the days when we were automatically ranked 20th....in a down year.
Pac12 Dreck > Big10 Dreck
-
Fucking this.PurpleJ said:
I like to ignore the costs of care while they are still alive. I do that. That's like saying more people should smoke, because they die earlier.FremontTroll said:
It's those skinny vegan health nuts that hang onto their last wisps of life for an extra 10 years that up healthcare costs.PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
Cholesterol and the diabetes are the only things saving our healthcare and social security systems. -
I like to double down on 16 against dealer showing a 10 that's what I like to do.PurpleJ said:
I like to ignore the costs of care while they are still alive. I do that. That's like saying more people should smoke, because they die earlier.FremontTroll said:
It's those skinny vegan health nuts that hang onto their last wisps of life for an extra 10 years that up healthcare costs.PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
Cholesterol and the diabetes are the only things saving our healthcare and social security systems.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/health/05iht-obese.1.9748884.html?referrer=&_r=0
-
Disagree. The level of confounding and assumptions in that study are profound.FremontTroll said:
I like to double down on 16 against dealer showing a 10 that's what I like to do.PurpleJ said:
I like to ignore the costs of care while they are still alive. I do that. That's like saying more people should smoke, because they die earlier.FremontTroll said:
It's those skinny vegan health nuts that hang onto their last wisps of life for an extra 10 years that up healthcare costs.PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
Cholesterol and the diabetes are the only things saving our healthcare and social security systems.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/health/05iht-obese.1.9748884.html?referrer=&_r=0
I'm not sure data from the Netherlands in 2003 is an appropriate surrogate for the US population, especially since outcomes in African Americans is will have worse outcomes in the US than a normal Dutch person. And, FWIW, the obese people and smokers who die off younger are producing less than the healthier people, especially since they have more dying off in the working age. They might cost less overall, but the fact they miss 5-10 years or so of producing means lost wages. It fails to compensate the differences in how much these people produced in their lifetimes. If the median US income is $52,000 and these people are dying off 5 years earlier, they're missing out on $260,000.
I'd have to look at the paper in more detail, but I don't think the study can be directly applied to an American population, especially since there will be differences in health care costs, health outcomes, indirect costs, non-medical costs, and other factors. -
it may have seemed like a good career move at the time but, now... clearly... Connor Halliday should have picked movies>>>footballRoadDawg55 said:
I would love to read the casting call for that kid.SpoonieLuv said:Patohondo said:It's OK because you're .....young
“This is going to be young, really young. But I will say this – we really like the kids that we recruited last year. We like the guys that we’re bringing in this year that aren’t even here. They’re going to be good players. And we have some good players that are young (that were recruited) before we got here that maybe haven’t done a whole lot. We are a young team, but we’ll get there.”
"We need a hideously ugly 10-14 year old male. The more grotesque the better. If you think that is you, call Jeffrey at 1-888-casting or visit lacasting.com
-
Huge ears a must...RoadDawg55 said:
I would love to read the casting call for that kid.SpoonieLuv said:Patohondo said:It's OK because you're .....young
“This is going to be young, really young. But I will say this – we really like the kids that we recruited last year. We like the guys that we’re bringing in this year that aren’t even here. They’re going to be good players. And we have some good players that are young (that were recruited) before we got here that maybe haven’t done a whole lot. We are a young team, but we’ll get there.”
"We need a hideously ugly 10-14 year old male. The more grotesque the better. If you think that is you, call Jeffrey at 1-888-casting or visit lacasting.com -
We are talking about direct health care costs.whatshouldicareabout said:
Disagree. The level of confounding and assumptions in that study are profound.FremontTroll said:
I like to double down on 16 against dealer showing a 10 that's what I like to do.PurpleJ said:
I like to ignore the costs of care while they are still alive. I do that. That's like saying more people should smoke, because they die earlier.FremontTroll said:
It's those skinny vegan health nuts that hang onto their last wisps of life for an extra 10 years that up healthcare costs.PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
Cholesterol and the diabetes are the only things saving our healthcare and social security systems.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/health/05iht-obese.1.9748884.html?referrer=&_r=0
I'm not sure data from the Netherlands in 2003 is an appropriate surrogate for the US population, especially since outcomes in African Americans is will have worse outcomes in the US than a normal Dutch person. And, FWIW, the obese people and smokers who die off younger are producing less than the healthier people, especially since they have more dying off in the working age. They might cost less overall, but the fact they miss 5-10 years or so of producing means lost wages. It fails to compensate the differences in how much these people produced in their lifetimes. If the median US income is $52,000 and these people are dying off 5 years earlier, they're missing out on $260,000.
I'd have to look at the paper in more detail, but I don't think the study can be directly applied to an American population, especially since there will be differences in health care costs, health outcomes, indirect costs, non-medical costs, and other factors.
You can point out possible shortcomings of the study but what other study looked at costs per lifetime? I would like to see them.
Every study I've seen looking at the costs of obesity made comparisons on a yearly basis without considering fatties' shorter lifespans. -
Shit. Unleashed. Belongs.FremontTroll said:
We are talking about direct health care costs.whatshouldicareabout said:
Disagree. The level of confounding and assumptions in that study are profound.FremontTroll said:
I like to double down on 16 against dealer showing a 10 that's what I like to do.PurpleJ said:
I like to ignore the costs of care while they are still alive. I do that. That's like saying more people should smoke, because they die earlier.FremontTroll said:
It's those skinny vegan health nuts that hang onto their last wisps of life for an extra 10 years that up healthcare costs.PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
Cholesterol and the diabetes are the only things saving our healthcare and social security systems.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/health/05iht-obese.1.9748884.html?referrer=&_r=0
I'm not sure data from the Netherlands in 2003 is an appropriate surrogate for the US population, especially since outcomes in African Americans is will have worse outcomes in the US than a normal Dutch person. And, FWIW, the obese people and smokers who die off younger are producing less than the healthier people, especially since they have more dying off in the working age. They might cost less overall, but the fact they miss 5-10 years or so of producing means lost wages. It fails to compensate the differences in how much these people produced in their lifetimes. If the median US income is $52,000 and these people are dying off 5 years earlier, they're missing out on $260,000.
I'd have to look at the paper in more detail, but I don't think the study can be directly applied to an American population, especially since there will be differences in health care costs, health outcomes, indirect costs, non-medical costs, and other factors.
You can point out possible shortcomings of the study but what other study looked at costs per lifetime? I would like to see them.
Every study I've seen looking at the costs of obesity made comparisons on a yearly basis without considering fatties' shorter lifespans. -
Could you 3 fags please take this to the whogivesaflyingfuck bored?FremontTroll said:
We are talking about direct health care costs.whatshouldicareabout said:
Disagree. The level of confounding and assumptions in that study are profound.FremontTroll said:
I like to double down on 16 against dealer showing a 10 that's what I like to do.PurpleJ said:
I like to ignore the costs of care while they are still alive. I do that. That's like saying more people should smoke, because they die earlier.FremontTroll said:
It's those skinny vegan health nuts that hang onto their last wisps of life for an extra 10 years that up healthcare costs.PurpleJ said:Fuck fat people for upping healthcare costs.
Cholesterol and the diabetes are the only things saving our healthcare and social security systems.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/health/05iht-obese.1.9748884.html?referrer=&_r=0
I'm not sure data from the Netherlands in 2003 is an appropriate surrogate for the US population, especially since outcomes in African Americans is will have worse outcomes in the US than a normal Dutch person. And, FWIW, the obese people and smokers who die off younger are producing less than the healthier people, especially since they have more dying off in the working age. They might cost less overall, but the fact they miss 5-10 years or so of producing means lost wages. It fails to compensate the differences in how much these people produced in their lifetimes. If the median US income is $52,000 and these people are dying off 5 years earlier, they're missing out on $260,000.
I'd have to look at the paper in more detail, but I don't think the study can be directly applied to an American population, especially since there will be differences in health care costs, health outcomes, indirect costs, non-medical costs, and other factors.
You can point out possible shortcomings of the study but what other study looked at costs per lifetime? I would like to see them.
Every study I've seen looking at the costs of obesity made comparisons on a yearly basis without considering fatties' shorter lifespans.
Seriously, football is upon us - go fuck off with that shit
