Neuheisel excited about UCLA-Georgia series being scheduled

AtomicPiss

onlineathens.com/breaking-news/2015-07-14/uga-and-ucla-series-scheduled-former-bruin-qb-and-coach-welcomes-good

bananasnblondes

the coach of our wet dreams vs. the qb of our wet dreams

Fire_Marshall_Bill

So Georgia will have played west of Houston for the second time since the Jim Crow days...in 10 years. Kudos SEC.

MisterEm

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

So Georgia will have played west of Houston for the second time since the Jim Crow days...in 10 years. Kudos SEC.

Sounds like you're concerned and/or butthurt.

Abundance, perhaps?

BallSacked

They scheduled home and homes with A&M, LSU, Georgia over next 10-12 years. To go with Oklahoma and Michigan as well.

Overkill.

PostGameOrangeSlices

BallSacked said:

They scheduled home and homes with A&M, LSU, Georgia over next 10-12 years. To go with Oklahoma and Michigan as well.

Overkill.

Sounds like UW 10 years ago. Beware 0-12

RoadDawg55

BallSacked said:

They scheduled home and homes with A&M, LSU, Georgia over next 10-12 years. To go with Oklahoma and Michigan as well.

Overkill.

Couldn't disagree more. It's good scheduling and how it should be. If UW did the same, I would be happy.

BallSacked

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

BallSacked said:

They scheduled home and homes with A&M, LSU, Georgia over next 10-12 years. To go with Oklahoma and Michigan as well.

Overkill.

Sounds like UW 10 years ago. Beware 0-12

UCLA, UW and SC were consistently the most aggressive non-Conf schedulers around, then Sark happened. Only SC, ND and UCLA have never played a FCS team. I believe UW was the 4th team until very recently.

CuntWaffle

A black eye for our children for fucks sake. I would say our childrens' children but that generation will fail to exist. This is so preposterous I'm still shaking my head. Im getting dizzy, like in the good ole' days when I woke up in this state regularly with pussy juice caked to my face and a nameless twat's feet in my grill. Its bringing back fond times. What is going on with my country? Tthe great baboon has taken over and handed it to the muslim baboons

Doogles

The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.

It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.

BallSacked

Doogles said:

The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.

It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.

False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.

I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.

whatshouldicareabout

BallSacked said:

Doogles said:

The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.

It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.

False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.

I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.

You're UCLA.

Doogles

BallSacked said:

Doogles said:

The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.

It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.

False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.

I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.

Baylor disagrees with your assessment. The committee has made it clear SOS matters. It was more important to go soft in the BCS because you needed that undefeated season (outside the sec).

Now it's better to sack up and smack someone worthy ooc so your resume sits at the top of the 1-loss pile when you choke to Oregon state or some other dreck in conference.

chuck

1. Ballsack up

2. Schedule good competition

3. Beat said competition

4. Play for the natty
4a. ???

5. Profit

This isn't rocket science and even I've been saying it for a decade in response to doogs crying about the schedule. Play the best OOC schedule you can muster. Drop a couple of them and you still have the conference patsies to ensure your shit tier bowl game. Win one of them and fatten up in conference and you're on the short list of respectable teams at the end. Win them both/all and you're playing for the natty.

Drop all your tough OOC games and fail to fatten up in conference...well fuck it in that case. You suck and don't need the dubious honor of playing the Vegas bowl that beating dreck OOC WOULD have earned you.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

MisterEm said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

So Georgia will have played west of Houston for the second time since the Jim Crow days...in 10 years. Kudos SEC.

Sounds like you're concerned and/or butthurt.

Abundance, perhaps?

Butthurt...about what exactly? Even Race knows Puppy and I (and sort of Roaddawg) were right. I piss off the same four or five people off continually "professor"

RaceBannon

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

MisterEm said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

So Georgia will have played west of Houston for the second time since the Jim Crow days...in 10 years. Kudos SEC.

Sounds like you're concerned and/or butthurt.

Abundance, perhaps?

Butthurt...about what exactly? Even Race knows Puppy and I (and sort of Roaddawg) were right. I piss off the same four or five people off continually "professor"

Sure

MisterEm

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

MisterEm said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

So Georgia will have played west of Houston for the second time since the Jim Crow days...in 10 years. Kudos SEC.

Sounds like you're concerned and/or butthurt.

Abundance, perhaps?

Butthurt...about what exactly? Even Race knows Puppy and I (and sort of Roaddawg) were right. I piss off the same four or five people off continually "professor"

Are you new here?

Grow a pair already.

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

Doogles said:

BallSacked said:

Doogles said:

The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.

It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.

False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.

I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.

Baylor disagrees with your assessment. The committee has made it clear SOS matters. It was more important to go soft in the BCS because you needed that undefeated season (outside the sec).

Now it's better to sack up and smack someone worthy ooc so your resume sits at the top of the 1-loss pile when you choke to Oregon state or some other dreck in conference.

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I could also make the argument that Baylor's planned soft schedule would have gotten them in the Playoff if they had just beaten West Virginia.

BallSacked

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

Doogles said:

BallSacked said:

Doogles said:

The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.

It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.

False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.

I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.

Baylor disagrees with your assessment. The committee has made it clear SOS matters. It was more important to go soft in the BCS because you needed that undefeated season (outside the sec).

Now it's better to sack up and smack someone worthy ooc so your resume sits at the top of the 1-loss pile when you choke to Oregon state or some other dreck in conference.

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I could also make the argument that Baylor's planned soft schedule would have gotten them in the Playoff if they had just beaten West Virginia.

Baylor was a dumb example by dingleberry. They played the softest non-conference schedule and they don't have a conference title game.

Doogles

BallSacked said:

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

Doogles said:

BallSacked said:

Doogles said:

The tOSU and Oklahoma year was rough, but you should have a marquee program on the schedule every year just in case that elusive "special" season comes around and you have a chance at the dance.

It's a fucking crime scheduling like a puszy.

False. These games are scheduled for ticket sales, fan interest and TV money, and that comes with the tradeoff of not maximizing NATTY opportunities.

I love major non-Conf games, best part about the game. But at the end of the year no one really cares if you beat Iowa or Bama, just don't be 10-2 and don't play too much FCS trash and you're probably in. Especially in the pac12 or SEC right now.

Baylor disagrees with your assessment. The committee has made it clear SOS matters. It was more important to go soft in the BCS because you needed that undefeated season (outside the sec).

Now it's better to sack up and smack someone worthy ooc so your resume sits at the top of the 1-loss pile when you choke to Oregon state or some other dreck in conference.

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I could also make the argument that Baylor's planned soft schedule would have gotten them in the Playoff if they had just beaten West Virginia.

Baylor was a dumb example by dingleberry. They played the softest non-conference schedule and they don't have a conference title game.

Such Fag, Ballbag.

TCU works too. Either of those teams plays someone decent OOC they probably keep tOSU out of the playoffs. So it matters. The idea scheduling like a pussy increases your chances is complete wrong. Not having a championship game hurts the B12 no doubt, but that will be temporary until the next realignment and you'll have more power conf. true champs than spots available. The team that crossed over and took out a big time opponent is the team getting the nod.

And to the WVU comment, that's the type of dreckish/mediocre team that will beat you in conference and ruin your season if there is no substance to your schedule.

Ultimately it comes down to if you belong in the dance you'll persevere through a rough ooc. Leave it to a soft bruin to advocate a handholding to the playoffs.

RaceBannon

Hopefully pool boy's schedule will lead to #StadiumDefault