Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

On paper, this team should win the Pac-12

2»

Comments

  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,478 Swaye's Wigwam

    Hookers are cheaper than wives.

    Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.

    Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.

    So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.

    Great Auburndoog style comparison as always.
    I was trying to point out that even if you get laid more when you're married, it still isn't worth it.

    Mathematically Sexual Superiority Guy?
    What you proved is that marriage is worth it if you don't marry a frigid bitch.
    Yeah, but I am hearing that doesn't happen 81% of the time.
  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    On paper, this team should win the Pac-12

    Rolling paper?
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217

    On paper, this team should win the Pac-12

    Rolling paper?

    blotting paper

  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652

    On paper, this team should win the Pac-12

    Rolling paper?

    blotting paper

    Rice paper could work too. "On paper" is all Sark will ever be able to produce. Paper only serves to get our hopes up before being dashed when the games are played.

    Pac-12 title on blotting paper > Pac-12 title on rice paper > Pac-12 title on rolling paper.