Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

On paper, this team should win the Pac-12

PostGameOrangeSlices
PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217
edited August 2013 in Hardcore Husky Board
- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





«1

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Baring injury?
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    - Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
    - Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
    - All American TE, solid TE backups
    - Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
    - O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
    - D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
    - Solid core of veteran LB's
    - Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
    - New stadium, easily the best in the conference
    - 20 returning starters
    - 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





    One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





    The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.
    The OL and DL are soft.
    The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
    UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.


    Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
  • loadsock
    loadsock Member Posts: 686
    You forgot Jack H Lockner, the best player on the field. Or John Ross, who will emerge to help win 2 games all by himself.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217
    edited August 2013

    - Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
    - Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
    - All American TE, solid TE backups
    - Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
    - O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
    - D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
    - Solid core of veteran LB's
    - Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
    - New stadium, easily the best in the conference
    - 20 returning starters
    - 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





    One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





    The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.
    The OL and DL are soft.
    The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
    UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.


    Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.

    The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?

    Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.

    And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217

    Baring injury?

    and altitude
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680



    - Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
    - Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
    - All American TE, solid TE backups
    - Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
    - O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
    - D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
    - Solid core of veteran LB's
    - Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
    - New stadium, easily the best in the conference
    - 20 returning starters
    - 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





    One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





    The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.
    The OL and DL are soft.
    The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
    UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.


    Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.

    The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?

    Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.

    And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
    The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.

    Let it play out.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217
    edited August 2013



    - Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
    - Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
    - All American TE, solid TE backups
    - Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
    - O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
    - D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
    - Solid core of veteran LB's
    - Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
    - New stadium, easily the best in the conference
    - 20 returning starters
    - 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





    One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





    The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.
    The OL and DL are soft.
    The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
    UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.


    Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.

    The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?

    Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.

    And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
    The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.

    Let it play out.
    Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.

    On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680



    - Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
    - Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
    - All American TE, solid TE backups
    - Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
    - O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
    - D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
    - Solid core of veteran LB's
    - Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
    - New stadium, easily the best in the conference
    - 20 returning starters
    - 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





    One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





    The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.
    The OL and DL are soft.
    The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
    UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.


    Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.

    The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?

    Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.

    And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
    The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.

    Let it play out.
    Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.

    On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy

    Plus we get Gus Johnson at home.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217



    - Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
    - Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
    - All American TE, solid TE backups
    - Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
    - O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
    - D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
    - Solid core of veteran LB's
    - Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
    - New stadium, easily the best in the conference
    - 20 returning starters
    - 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





    One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





    The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.
    The OL and DL are soft.
    The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
    UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.


    Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.

    The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?

    Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.

    And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
    The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.

    Let it play out.
    Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.

    On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy

    Plus we get Gus Johnson at home.
    And blowjobs during halftime from the comfort of the couch
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680



    - Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
    - Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
    - All American TE, solid TE backups
    - Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
    - O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
    - D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
    - Solid core of veteran LB's
    - Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
    - New stadium, easily the best in the conference
    - 20 returning starters
    - 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





    One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





    The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.
    The OL and DL are soft.
    The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
    UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.


    Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.

    The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?

    Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.

    And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
    The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.

    Let it play out.
    Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.

    On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy

    Plus we get Gus Johnson at home.
    And blowjobs during halftime from the comfort of the couch
    It's cheaper to get blowjobs at home on the couch than from some bum on the Ave after the game.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217



    - Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
    - Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
    - All American TE, solid TE backups
    - Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
    - O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
    - D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
    - Solid core of veteran LB's
    - Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
    - New stadium, easily the best in the conference
    - 20 returning starters
    - 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





    One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





    The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.
    The OL and DL are soft.
    The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
    UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.


    Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.

    The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?

    Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.

    And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
    The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.

    Let it play out.
    Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.

    On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy

    Plus we get Gus Johnson at home.
    And blowjobs during halftime from the comfort of the couch
    It's cheaper to get blowjobs at home on the couch than from some bum on the Ave after the game.
    Depends how much you're paying your hookers for a house call
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    loadsock said:

    You forgot Jack H Lockner, the best player on the field. Or John Ross, who will emerge to help win 2 games all by himself.

    *swoon*
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217

    loadsock said:

    You forgot Jack H Lockner, the best player on the field. Or John Ross, who will emerge to help win 2 games all by himself.

    *swoon*
    I'll say one thing, the lad sure did know how to give momma Lockner a sloppy, wet peck on the lips


  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,347 Founders Club



    - Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
    - Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
    - All American TE, solid TE backups
    - Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
    - O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
    - D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
    - Solid core of veteran LB's
    - Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
    - New stadium, easily the best in the conference
    - 20 returning starters
    - 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance





    One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO





    The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.
    The OL and DL are soft.
    The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
    UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.


    Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.

    The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?

    Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.

    And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
    The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.

    Let it play out.
    Agree. The stadium, as a venue, is easily the best in the conference but that will only translate to a large home field advantage with crowd participation. And, to poont out the obvious, that will require better play.
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    trust issues are holding them back from reaching their Pac12 title.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217
    TheGlove said:

    trust issues are holding them back from reaching their Pac12 title.

    with all Sark's blabbering about "trust issues", you'd think the fuck was a marriage counselor
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Damn two threads that resemble a 5 reasons whoosh but was actually serious.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217

    Damn two threads that resemble a 5 reasons whoosh but was actually serious.

    whiff

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    If you are 45 and your net worth is only $600,000 you should probably give up anyways.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,217

    If you are 45 and your net worth is only $600,000 you should probably give up anyways.

    says the history major

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,148

    Hookers are cheaper than wives.

    Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.

    Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.

    So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.

    Life lessons from CheersWestDawg needs to be a weekly feature on this board.

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    If you are 45 and your net worth is only $600,000 you should probably give up anyways.

    says the history major

    Jack H Lockner was a history major...bruh.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Hookers are cheaper than wives.

    Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.

    Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.

    So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.

    $250 is on the high side.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Hookers are cheaper than wives.

    Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.

    Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.

    So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.

    Great Auburndoog style comparison as always.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Hookers are cheaper than wives.

    Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.

    Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.

    So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.

    Great Auburndoog style comparison as always.
    We can't all be math majors
  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,478 Swaye's Wigwam

    Hookers are cheaper than wives.

    Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.

    Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.

    So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.

    Great Auburndoog style comparison as always.
    I was trying to point out that even if you get laid more when you're married, it still isn't worth it.

    Mathematically Sexual Superiority Guy?
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Hookers are cheaper than wives.

    Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.

    Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.

    So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.

    Great Auburndoog style comparison as always.
    I was trying to point out that even if you get laid more when you're married, it still isn't worth it.

    Mathematically Sexual Superiority Guy?
    What you proved is that marriage is worth it if you don't marry a frigid bitch.