On paper, this team should win the Pac-12
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
Comments
-
Baring injury?
-
The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.PostGameOrangeSlices said:- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
-
You forgot Jack H Lockner, the best player on the field. Or John Ross, who will emerge to help win 2 games all by himself.
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.PostGameOrangeSlices said:- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?
Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.
And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link -
and altitudeMikeDamone said:Baring injury?
-
The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.PostGameOrangeSlices said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.PostGameOrangeSlices said:- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?
Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.
And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
Let it play out. -
Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.PostGameOrangeSlices said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.PostGameOrangeSlices said:- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?
Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.
And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
Let it play out.
On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy
-
Plus we get Gus Johnson at home.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.PostGameOrangeSlices said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.PostGameOrangeSlices said:- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?
Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.
And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
Let it play out.
On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy -
And blowjobs during halftime from the comfort of the couchTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plus we get Gus Johnson at home.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.PostGameOrangeSlices said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.PostGameOrangeSlices said:- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?
Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.
And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
Let it play out.
On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy
-
It's cheaper to get blowjobs at home on the couch than from some bum on the Ave after the game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
And blowjobs during halftime from the comfort of the couchTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plus we get Gus Johnson at home.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.PostGameOrangeSlices said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.PostGameOrangeSlices said:- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?
Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.
And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
Let it play out.
On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy -
Depends how much you're paying your hookers for a house callTierbsHsotBoobs said:
It's cheaper to get blowjobs at home on the couch than from some bum on the Ave after the game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
And blowjobs during halftime from the comfort of the couchTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plus we get Gus Johnson at home.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Valid point. Im hoping the closer proximity of the fans to the field makes up for it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.PostGameOrangeSlices said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.PostGameOrangeSlices said:- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?
Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.
And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
Let it play out.
On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy -
*swoon*loadsock said:You forgot Jack H Lockner, the best player on the field. Or John Ross, who will emerge to help win 2 games all by himself.
-
I'll say one thing, the lad sure did know how to give momma Lockner a sloppy, wet peck on the lipsThomasFremont said:
*swoon*loadsock said:You forgot Jack H Lockner, the best player on the field. Or John Ross, who will emerge to help win 2 games all by himself.
-
Agree. The stadium, as a venue, is easily the best in the conference but that will only translate to a large home field advantage with crowd participation. And, to poont out the obvious, that will require better play.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The stadium sure looks the best in the conference now, but it could actually be quieter because the students have been deported to the end zone and replaced by fat cats who tend to sit on their hands.PostGameOrangeSlices said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The WRs as a group are mediocre/unproven.PostGameOrangeSlices said:- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?
Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.
And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
Let it play out.
-
trust issues are holding them back from reaching their Pac12 title.
-
with all Sark's blabbering about "trust issues", you'd think the fuck was a marriage counselorTheGlove said:trust issues are holding them back from reaching their Pac12 title.
-
Damn two threads that resemble a 5 reasons whoosh but was actually serious.
-
whiffHe_Needs_More_Time said:Damn two threads that resemble a 5 reasons whoosh but was actually serious.
-
Hookers are cheaper than wives.
Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.
Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.
So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit. -
This is the kind of premium content that you can't get anywhere else!CheersWestDawg said:Hookers are cheaper than wives.
Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.
Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.
So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit. -
If you are 45 and your net worth is only $600,000 you should probably give up anyways.
-
says the history majorThomasFremont said:If you are 45 and your net worth is only $600,000 you should probably give up anyways.
-
Life lessons from CheersWestDawg needs to be a weekly feature on this board.CheersWestDawg said:Hookers are cheaper than wives.
Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.
Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.
So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.
-
Jack H Lockner was a history major...bruh.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
says the history majorThomasFremont said:If you are 45 and your net worth is only $600,000 you should probably give up anyways.
-
Or, you could try not sucking at getting laid.CheersWestDawg said:So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.
-
$250 is on the high side.CheersWestDawg said:Hookers are cheaper than wives.
Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.
Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.
So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit. -
Great Auburndoog style comparison as always.CheersWestDawg said:Hookers are cheaper than wives.
Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.
Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.
So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit. -
We can't all be math majorsTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Great Auburndoog style comparison as always.CheersWestDawg said:Hookers are cheaper than wives.
Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.
Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.
So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit. -
I was trying to point out that even if you get laid more when you're married, it still isn't worth it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Great Auburndoog style comparison as always.CheersWestDawg said:Hookers are cheaper than wives.
Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.
Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.
So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.
Mathematically Sexual Superiority Guy? -
What you proved is that marriage is worth it if you don't marry a frigid bitch.CheersWestDawg said:
I was trying to point out that even if you get laid more when you're married, it still isn't worth it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Great Auburndoog style comparison as always.CheersWestDawg said:Hookers are cheaper than wives.
Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.
Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.
So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.
Mathematically Sexual Superiority Guy?
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
