Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
On paper, this team should win the Pac-12
- Senior QB entering 3rd season as a starter, holds school record for TD passes in a season
- Returning starter at RB who rushed for 1400+ yards and is a stud, good backups
- All American TE, solid TE backups
- Good WR core made up of veterans and allegedly talented newcomers
- O-Line of juniors and seniors, all with starting experience. Good run blockers.
- D-Line has key players coming back from injury and tons of starting experience
- Solid core of veteran LB's
- Senior safeties, one of which will be a 3 year starter and an all pac-12 caliber player
- New stadium, easily the best in the conference
- 20 returning starters
- 5th year coach with 3 straight bowl appearance
One of those points is holding this program back. Win the conference or GTFO
0 ·
Comments
The OL and DL are soft.
The stadium is nice, but it's not easily the best in the conference. Let's see what sort of homefield advantage UW actually gets from playing there first.
UW still has to play road games in the Pac-12. We really should petition the conference for 9 home games one of these years.
Having said all that, it's on the coach. Three straight bowl appearances isn't an accomplishment in modern college football. Orange slices and all that.
The stadium is the best in the conference, what the fuck are you talking about?
Every team has to play road games. I'm looking at this roster as it is on paper, I'm not taking into account Sark's fucking horrific player management, playcalling, and performances on the road.
And indeed, 3 bowl appearances and 5 years of experience doesn't mean shit, hence my poont about one of the bullet points actually being the weak link
Let it play out.
On second thought, fuck it, don't care. Either way I will be enjoying the game from the comfort of my living room, drinking shiner and smoking hash oil out of the bong. Beats the hell out of soda cups and ticket prices in THIS economy
Let's say you get a hooker for $250. You decide you want to get laid 25 times per year. That's $6,250 per year to get laid. Do that for 20 years, it's $125,000.
Now lets say you've been married for 20 years. The wife lets you fuck her once per week on average. You both work, you've saved well, you're 45 and your net worth is $600,000. She decides to divorce you. Lets say the judge is nice and lets you off easy and says "half". You just paid $300,000 (at minimum) to get laid 1,040 times or $288/fuck.
So, don't get married. Get hookers. Save yourself $38/bang and a lifetime of bullshit.