What's more likely this season?

AtomicPiss

TTJ

Dennis_DeYoung

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

It's not even close.

RaceBannon

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Swaye

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

Wiff a bullet.

Doogles

Oregon falls back to earth with an 8-4 season

Sark's best team talent wise, the what's gone wrong article will be after the Bama plunger in year 3.

I think Oregon having someone other than Mariota behind center loses them more games. He was perfect last year, hard to replicate that.

RoadDawg55

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

Doogles said:

Sark's best team talent wise, the what's gone wrong article will be after the Bama plunger in year 3.

I think Oregon having someone other than Mariota behind center loses them more games. He was perfect last year, hard to replicate that.

They could win 9 just by relying on their running game. I think it's possible Adams won't be a star, but I doubt he will be a liability either.

BallSacked

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

TierbsHsotBoobs

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

BallSacked

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

TierbsHsotBoobs

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

And Boise State won the Pac 12 South last season.

dnc

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

And Boise State took the Pac 12 South title from Notre Dame last season.

BallSacked

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

And Boise State won the Pac 12 South last season.

Missouri has won the SEC East twice in a row. Virginia Tech won the big10?

But how is boobs lone talking point a fucking dreckfest?

RoadDawg55

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

The PAC 12 North is a dreckfest? Is that a typo? Oregon and Stanford have dominated the conference in recent years.

BallSacked

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

RoadDawg55 said:

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

The PAC 12 North is a dreckfest? Is that a typo? Oregon and Stanford have dominated the conference in recent years.

Not a typo, objective: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Subjectively, after Stanford and Oregon the North has a pretty big drop off. The North is good like the ACC coastal(or whatever FSU and Clemson is in) is good. Oregon is top dog, but South is the stronger division.

PostGameOrangeSlices

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

Broons gonna broon

dnc

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

The PAC 12 North is a dreckfest? Is that a typo? Oregon and Stanford have dominated the conference in recent years.

Not a typo, objective: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Subjectively, after Stanford and Oregon the North has a pretty big drop off. The North is good like the ACC coastal(or whatever FSU and Clemson is in) is good. Oregon is top dog, but South is the stronger division.

NOGAF about parity. Conferences and divisions are defined by their best teams. Pac12 north best >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pac12 south best, pretty much as long as the pac12 has been a thing.

RoadDawg55

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

The PAC 12 North is a dreckfest? Is that a typo? Oregon and Stanford have dominated the conference in recent years.

Not a typo, objective: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Subjectively, after Stanford and Oregon the North has a pretty big drop off. The North is good like the ACC coastal(or whatever FSU and Clemson is in) is good. Oregon is top dog, but South is the stronger division.

Never go full retard. CFB is cyclicle and the South at some point will likely be stronger, but saying the South > North is FS. As DNC noted, the South hasn't won a single conference championship since the expansion.

BallSacked

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

RoadDawg55 said:

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

The PAC 12 North is a dreckfest? Is that a typo? Oregon and Stanford have dominated the conference in recent years.

Not a typo, objective: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Subjectively, after Stanford and Oregon the North has a pretty big drop off. The North is good like the ACC coastal(or whatever FSU and Clemson is in) is good. Oregon is top dog, but South is the stronger division.

Never go full retard. CFB is cyclicle and the South at some point will likely be stronger, but saying the South > North is FS. As DNC noted, the South hasn't won a single conference championship since the expansion.

Bottom line the third strongest team in the North last year and once again in 2015 is UW or Cal. End of story. It is cyclicle (wjw), but that's where we are at at the moment.

Your podmates have made the same point about the south and north, a few times. Maybe you can let them know how FS they are to their FACE!!

dnc

ESPN and LA Times run "What's gone wrong?" articles about Sark

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

Leach isn't winning 5 and Oregon isn't losing 4

Not losing 4, but they aren't going 11-1 regular season either. I think 10-2 or 9-3, that'll still win the north.

But how is the Pac 12 a fucking dreckfest?

Pac12 North is dreck. Just like the SEC East.

The PAC 12 North is a dreckfest? Is that a typo? Oregon and Stanford have dominated the conference in recent years.

Not a typo, objective: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Subjectively, after Stanford and Oregon the North has a pretty big drop off. The North is good like the ACC coastal(or whatever FSU and Clemson is in) is good. Oregon is top dog, but South is the stronger division.

Never go full retard. CFB is cyclicle and the South at some point will likely be stronger, but saying the South > North is FS. As DNC noted, the South hasn't won a single conference championship since the expansion.

Bottom line the third strongest team in the North last year and once again in 2015 is UW or Cal. End of story. It is cyclicle (wjw), but that's where we are at at the moment.

Your podmates have made the same point about the south and north, a few times. Maybe you can let them know how FS they are to their FACE!!