Sacramento St tickets trading for $9
Comments
-
I heard even Crazy Larry won't be at that game
-
Woof
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree completely.ApostleofGrief said:
quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.DerekJohnson said:I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.
If you're going to book a scrimmage, pickIdaho StateWestern's Intramural squad. -
Obvious fix is obviousTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree completely.ApostleofGrief said:
quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.DerekJohnson said:I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.
If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Eastern Washington. -
there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common to play out of levels.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree completely.ApostleofGrief said:
quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.DerekJohnson said:I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.
If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State. -
ApostleofGrief said:
there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common toTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree completely.ApostleofGrief said:
quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.DerekJohnson said:I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.
If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.play out of levelsto be a pussy and not face anyone of consequence. -
well, all I can say is that last year's game with a I-AA WAS THE ONLY GAME WITH ANY MOTHERFUCKING COMPETITION. The problem is scheduling SHITTY PUSSY TEAMS. If you schedule a contender I-AA team with a history you will likely get a good football game.topdawgnc said:ApostleofGrief said:
there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common toTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree completely.ApostleofGrief said:
quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.DerekJohnson said:I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.
If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.play out of levelsto be a pussy and not face anyone of consequence. -
Disagree. Garbage in. Garbage out.ApostleofGrief said:
well, all I can say is that last year's game with a I-AA WAS THE ONLY GAME WITH ANY MOTHERFUCKING COMPETITION. The problem is scheduling SHITTY PUSSY TEAMS. If you schedule a contender I-AA team with a history you will likely get a good football game.topdawgnc said:ApostleofGrief said:
there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common toTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree completely.ApostleofGrief said:
quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.DerekJohnson said:I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.
If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.play out of levelsto be a pussy and not face anyone of consequence. -
I just hope these guys don't start stemming like those rotten SOB's that confused Sark and our OL last time.
-
well, if you want the best games, not garbage, schedule Notre Dame, Miami, and Alabama! If you want a realistic schedule it is better to have a contender I-AA team like Eastern than a shitty team like Georgia State or whatever, Utah State is not much more interesting. You guys keep saying that just having I-AA teams is the problem, but it is which teams that is the problem. You can get crappy IA teams and get worse results.MisterEm said:
Disagree. Garbage in. Garbage out.ApostleofGrief said:
well, all I can say is that last year's game with a I-AA WAS THE ONLY GAME WITH ANY MOTHERFUCKING COMPETITION. The problem is scheduling SHITTY PUSSY TEAMS. If you schedule a contender I-AA team with a history you will likely get a good football game.topdawgnc said:ApostleofGrief said:
there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common toTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree completely.ApostleofGrief said:
quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.DerekJohnson said:I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.
If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.play out of levelsto be a pussy and not face anyone of consequence.






