Sacramento St tickets trading for $9

ApostleofGrief

http://www.ticketmonster.com/buy-Washington-Huskies-vs-Sacramento-State-Hornets-tickets-at-Husky-Stadium---WA-Seattle-Washington-09-12-2015/621432

You knew it costs more to see the Central vs. South Dakota Mines game right?

HuskyJW

Still too high

RaccoonHarry

You know, Sac State once beat Oregon State...

Gladstone

But how is our program a complete dreckfest in every possible way?

ApostleofGrief

Also beat Colorado...they won't win here but it could by like the Georgia state game.

droggins

So glad I didn't renew.

TTJ

DerekJohnson

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

ApostleofGrief

DerekJohnson said:

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.

TierbsHsotBoobs

ApostleofGrief said:

DerekJohnson said:

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.

Disagree completely.

If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.

Dennis_DeYoung

STING THE BEES!!!!!

Meek

I heard even Crazy Larry won't be at that game

AtomicDawg

Woof

topdawgnc

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

ApostleofGrief said:

DerekJohnson said:

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.

Disagree completely.

If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State Western's Intramural squad.

dnc

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

ApostleofGrief said:

DerekJohnson said:

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.

Disagree completely.

If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Eastern Washington.

Obvious fix is obvious

ApostleofGrief

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

ApostleofGrief said:

DerekJohnson said:

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.

Disagree completely.

If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.

there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common to play out of levels.

topdawgnc

ApostleofGrief said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

ApostleofGrief said:

DerekJohnson said:

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.

Disagree completely.

If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.

there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common to play out of levels to be a pussy and not face anyone of consequence.

ApostleofGrief

topdawgnc said:

ApostleofGrief said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

ApostleofGrief said:

DerekJohnson said:

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.

Disagree completely.

If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.

there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common to play out of levels to be a pussy and not face anyone of consequence.

well, all I can say is that last year's game with a I-AA WAS THE ONLY GAME WITH ANY MOTHERFUCKING COMPETITION. The problem is scheduling SHITTY PUSSY TEAMS. If you schedule a contender I-AA team with a history you will likely get a good football game.

MisterEm

ApostleofGrief said:

topdawgnc said:

ApostleofGrief said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

ApostleofGrief said:

DerekJohnson said:

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.

Disagree completely.

If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.

there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common to play out of levels to be a pussy and not face anyone of consequence.

well, all I can say is that last year's game with a I-AA WAS THE ONLY GAME WITH ANY MOTHERFUCKING COMPETITION. The problem is scheduling SHITTY PUSSY TEAMS. If you schedule a contender I-AA team with a history you will likely get a good football game.

Disagree. Garbage in. Garbage out.

HuskyJW

I just hope these guys don't start stemming like those rotten SOB's that confused Sark and our OL last time.

ApostleofGrief

MisterEm said:

ApostleofGrief said:

topdawgnc said:

ApostleofGrief said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

ApostleofGrief said:

DerekJohnson said:

I would love to know if this was completely Woodward's doing or if Sark was the one pushing for it.

quite possibly both of them. It seems like if you are going to book a I-AA, book a good one, not a mediocre one, and make it your first game to get warmed up on. I guess you could make the case that they have won PAC-12 games. But, they should concentrate on I-AA teams with a strong tradition and line them up first for warm ups.

Disagree completely.

If you're going to book a scrimmage, pick Idaho State.

there is no point at all in playing Idaho st. You might as well line up tackling dummies and have a game. But you should book a contender from the lower conference. I think you assholes think it's a disgrace to play I-AA, but if you followed more of college football as a whole it is common to play out of levels to be a pussy and not face anyone of consequence.

well, all I can say is that last year's game with a I-AA WAS THE ONLY GAME WITH ANY MOTHERFUCKING COMPETITION. The problem is scheduling SHITTY PUSSY TEAMS. If you schedule a contender I-AA team with a history you will likely get a good football game.

Disagree. Garbage in. Garbage out.

well, if you want the best games, not garbage, schedule Notre Dame, Miami, and Alabama! If you want a realistic schedule it is better to have a contender I-AA team like Eastern than a shitty team like Georgia State or whatever, Utah State is not much more interesting. You guys keep saying that just having I-AA teams is the problem, but it is which teams that is the problem. You can get crappy IA teams and get worse results.