The depth chart is a thing of beauty

Auburndawg

Jamora and Tanigawa are back. Upperclassmen and returning starters everywhere you look. 5th year QB in his third year as the starter. Playmakers on both sides of the ball.

NO EXCUSES. NONE. ZERO.

WIN NOW OR DIE (In a fire or elsewhere)

TheKobeStopper

Auburndawg said:

Jamora and Tanigawa are back. Upperclassmen and returning starters everywhere you look. 5th year QB in his third year as the starter. Playmakers on both sides of the ball.

NO EXCUSES. NONE. ZERO.

WIN NOW OR ILL MAKE EXCUSES FOR WHY YOU DIDNT WIN LATER (In a fire or elsewhere)

MikeDamone

Auburndawg said:

Jamora and Tanigawa are back. Upperclassmen and returning starters everywhere you look. 5th year QB in his third year as the starter. Playmakers on both sides of the ball.

NO EXCUSES. NONE. ZERO.

WIN NOW OR DIE (In a fire or elsewhere)

Excuses or reasons? Some of you need to learn the difference.

Auburndawg

It's an odd thing. On Dawgman, Auburndawg is viewed as the lead nega. Heir to Race Bannon. Despised by Kim and Walla Walla Bill.

Here Auburndawg is the lead posi. Mocked by all.

Perhaps this means Auburndawg stands in the sensible center, hated by both extremes?

MikeDamone

You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.

Hth

TheKobeStopper

Auburndawg said:

It's an odd thing. On Dawgman, Auburndawg is viewed as the lead nega. Heir to Race Bannon. Despised by Kim and Walla Walla Bill.

Here Auburndawg is the lead posi. Mocked by all.

Perhaps this means Auburndawg stands in the sensible center, hated by both extremes?

Definitely not.

Auburndawg

MikeDamone said:

You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.
Hth

Perhaps. But it is a new day. And now there are no questions about "how long do you give a new coach." We are now where Ty was in year 3, which is when Auburndawg turned on him. No more excuses are possible.

[Deleted User]

Auburndawg said:

MikeDamone said:

You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.
Hth

Perhaps. But it is a new day. And now there are no questions about "how long do you give a new coach." We are now where Ty was in year 3, which is when Auburndawg turned on him. No more excuses are possible.

It's year 5 hth

DerekJohnson

Auburndawg said:

MikeDamone said:

You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.
Hth

Perhaps. But it is a new day. And now there are no questions about "how long do you give a new coach." We are now where Ty was in year 3, which is when Auburndawg turned on him. No more excuses are possible.

It's ironic that you refer to yourself in the third person while referring to a coach infamous for referring to himself in the third person.

Auburndawg

It's ironic that you refer to yourself in the third person while referring to a coach infamous for referring to himself in the third person.

Look up "Auburndawg, mythical character" It predates your arrival.

ThomasFremont

I have all the screenshots I need...see you in October.

RoadDawg55

Auburndawg said:

It's an odd thing. On Dawgman, Auburndawg is viewed as the lead nega. Heir to Race Bannon. Despised by Kim and Walla Walla Bill.

Here Auburndawg is the lead posi. Mocked by all.

Perhaps this means Auburndawg stands in the sensible center, hated by both extremes?

You're a moron on both forums. HTH

HeretoBeatmyChest

The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.

Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles.

[Deleted User]

Honestly the depth chart does look good until you get to the OL and DL then you realize we are fucked.

Then when you see who are head coach is you realize we are fucked.

If heading into year 5 with Mora let's say we had 4 straight ranked recruiting classes and had all this experience you'd be expecting 10 wins minimum.

However, with Sark you know our idiot doogs will accept 8 wins as "progress" and Pool Boy will give him an extension.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Auburndawg said:

MikeDamone said:

You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.
Hth

Perhaps. But it is a new day. And now there are no questions about "how long do you give a new coach." We are now where Ty was in year 3, which is when Auburndawg turned on him. No more excuses are possible.

If you had learned a single fucking thing from 0-12, you would have wanted Sark fired after his third year.

Hope this helps even though I know it won't because you're still just as AuburndoogFS as ever.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.

Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles.

That scenario is very plausible, which is scary. Next year's pussy schedule sets him up for 9-5 or 10-4, but they will still probably be third in the north, or maybe second. That gets the Doogs so excited they cream their pants, and then in '15, they revert back to 7-6, but that's ok because of youth, injuries, altitude, new assistants/system, heat, wind, cold, snow, hurricanes, humidity, and climate change.

RoadDawg55

TheKobeStopper said:

Auburndawg said:

Jamora and Tanigawa are back. Upperclassmen and returning starters everywhere you look. 5th year QB in his third year as the starter. Playmakers on both sides of the ball.

NO EXCUSES. NONE. ZERO.

WIN NOW OR ILL MAKE EXCUSES FOR WHY YOU DIDNT WIN LATER (In a fire or elsewhere)

One of the best posts I have ever read.

HeretoBeatmyChest

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.

Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles.

That scenario is very plausible, which is scary. Next year's pussy schedule sets him up for 9-5 or 10-4, but they will still probably be third in the north, or maybe second. That gets the Doogs so excited they cream their pants, and then in '15, they revert back to 7-6, but that's ok because of youth, injuries, altitude, new assistants/system, heat, wind, cold, snow, hurricanes, humidity, and climate change.

8-9 wins this year, 10 next year, 8 in 15, then 7 in 16 finally gets him fired. Realistic worst-case scenario.

I think Sark is opportunistic and is starting to feel the pressure as he realizes hes in over his head. If he can win 9 this year then his stock will be highest in 2014 and it makes sense for him to try to get an NFL job. He can get paid for a few years and come back to college and get a top 25 job in his late 40s. He will have made $2M/year for more than 10 years. However, if he stays at UW too long (losing Wilcox, Tosh, Sirmon, etc) and gets fired then he'll never make 7 figures again and unless he goes the NFL route and tries to climb the ladder over many years.

I think its more than plausible Sark is thinking this. However, the only catch is will someone in the NFL hire him. My hope is there is a team that needs a total 2-3 year rebuild and would therefore use him for the rebuild and fire him later when the rebuild was done.

ThomasFremont

Sark already rebuffed the NFL

RoadDawg55

If we somehow won 9 or 10 this year and Sark jumped to the NFL, I would be ecstatic. I think we win 8 games at most though. The only bad part would be that there would be doogs who would say Sark was a great coach for us.

I really think we are looking at a 6-6 or 7-5 regular season, and I hope that gets Sark fired. I'm pretty sure 6-6 with a couple plungers would do the trick.

Swaye

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.

Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles.

That scenario is very plausible, which is scary. Next year's pussy schedule sets him up for 9-5 or 10-4, but they will still probably be third in the north, or maybe second. That gets the Doogs so excited they cream their pants, and then in '15, they revert back to 7-6, but that's ok because of youth, injuries, altitude, new assistants/system, heat, wind, cold, snow, hurricanes, humidity, and climate change.

Agree. Just when things look to be set up for that "special season," El Nino will rear its' ugly head and fuck everything up. I blame methane, but I support cows and spray-on deodorant.