Line Lindy up under center with no threat of the pass? 60% runs with Lindy, new O-line and no threat of run or pass? No spread-shotgun with Lindy at qb and no threat of run or pass?
. The spread is the only offense that will allow Lindy time to throw it at the feet of his WR's. It's used to overcome shortcomings elsewhere. Yeah, Johnny Smith's playcalling was the problem. Lining up in the I-formation is hardly a good idea with new starters at every position. Retarded, simply idiotic post.
Hes unusually tall for a RB and runs with a pretty high pad level. Injuries will likely always be an issue for a player like that. He probably would have had a 1,000 yards last year had he stayed healthy.
There are and have been PLENTY of 6-1-6-2 tailbacks in college and the NFL. You are unusually dumb.
Line Lindy up under center with no threat of the pass? 60% runs with Lindy, new O-line and no threat of run or pass? No spread-shotgun with Lindy at qb and no threat of run or pass?
. The spread is the only offense that will allow Lindy time to throw it at the feet of his WR's. It's used to overcome shortcomings elsewhere. Yeah, Johnny Smith's playcalling was the problem. Lining up in the I-formation is hardly a good idea with new starters at every position. Retarded, simply idiotic post.
You're right, the best way to help out a shitty QB and new OL is to line up with 5 WRs and throw horizontally to midgets with stone hands.
Our new/young/Ossai OL will love pass blocking those rushers every play
how often did you roll around with Sark when he was up here? Why do you love his play book?
Dwayne Washington gets an A for athleticism and a C- for technique/skills.
Like in middle school football, you can play your biggest strongest kid at tailback and roll over the crappy disorganized teams but against a well-coached team, it won't work. Washington dominates the crap teams we play but can't do shit against the decent ones.
On the other hand you have Coleman who actually looks and plays like a RB but is slow as molasses with the ball.
Honestly I'm less excited about the RB position than I am about qb.
As for Smith, he needs to put something together that utilizes TEs, down field blocking, and short passes (not backwards screens across the field) in a major way if he's going to be successful with Lindquist.
Line Lindy up under center with no threat of the pass? 60% runs with Lindy, new O-line and no threat of run or pass? No spread-shotgun with Lindy at qb and no threat of run or pass?
. The spread is the only offense that will allow Lindy time to throw it at the feet of his WR's. It's used to overcome shortcomings elsewhere. Yeah, Johnny Smith's playcalling was the problem. Lining up in the I-formation is hardly a good idea with new starters at every position. Retarded, simply idiotic post.
You're right, the best way to help out a shitty QB and new OL is to line up with 5 WRs and throw horizontally to midgets with stone hands.
Our new/young/Ossai OL will love pass blocking those rushers every play
how often did you roll around with Sark when he was up here? Why do you love his play book?
insert
WTF? Lindy and his chargees are going to line up under center and pound the ball, throw via play action? With our all pac12 TE's 'lined up in 2-TE sets? ? Your post is heavily fuckered dude.
Line Lindy up under center with no threat of the pass? 60% runs with Lindy, new O-line and no threat of run or pass? No spread-shotgun with Lindy at qb and no threat of run or pass?
. The spread is the only offense that will allow Lindy time to throw it at the feet of his WR's. It's used to overcome shortcomings elsewhere. Yeah, Johnny Smith's playcalling was the problem. Lining up in the I-formation is hardly a good idea with new starters at every position. Retarded, simply idiotic post.
You're right, the best way to help out a shitty QB and new OL is to line up with 5 WRs and throw horizontally to midgets with stone hands.
Our new/young/Ossai OL will love pass blocking those rushers every play
how often did you roll around with Sark when he was up here? Why do you love his play book?
insert
WTF? Lindy and his chargees are going to line up under center and pound the ball, throw via play action? With our all pac12 TE's 'lined up in 2-TE sets? ? Your post is heavily fuckered dude.
Does this Ass-Hole realize we have 4 scholarships receivers on the roster-and that one of them is named Marvin Hall?
Line Lindy up under center with no threat of the pass? 60% runs with Lindy, new O-line and no threat of run or pass? No spread-shotgun with Lindy at qb and no threat of run or pass?
. The spread is the only offense that will allow Lindy time to throw it at the feet of his WR's. It's used to overcome shortcomings elsewhere. Yeah, Johnny Smith's playcalling was the problem. Lining up in the I-formation is hardly a good idea with new starters at every position. Retarded, simply idiotic post.
You're right, the best way to help out a shitty QB and new OL is to line up with 5 WRs and throw horizontally to midgets with stone hands.
Our new/young/Ossai OL will love pass blocking those rushers every play
how often did you roll around with Sark when he was up here? Why do you love his play book?
insert
WTF? Lindy and his chargees are going to line up under center and pound the ball, throw via play action? With our all pac12 TE's 'lined up in 2-TE sets? ? Your post is heavily fuckered dude.
Quick, name the 4th and 5th WRs that are going to lineup in your corky spread offense....
You could pick any type of offense to run next year and it's going to look like shit with what we have. FUCK
We aren't THAT bad personnel-wise, do you think man for man talent for talent we're vastly inferior to, say, an Arizona or Arizona State? Or Utah? No. If Petersen is who we think he is then he'll produce something of consequence from this group. Another year of having the worst offense in the P12 would be wholly unacceptable IMO.
No we arent THAT bad but its pretty bad. Look at the position groups. QB- Well well below average. Probably 11th or 12th in the Pac.
RB-Average, maybe a tick above. Washington and Coleman could be a decent power back 1-2. Dotson is intriguing and might play a bigger role than we think. Gaskin will probably play which is kinda too bad but Christ atleast he might not shit the bed and fumble against Arizona like the 34 YO wet eyes.
WR-Far far below average. Certainly the very worst in the Pac.
OL-Horrific at the edges, perhaps ok in the middle. Below average.
If you think this offense based off personnel is best served running a faggoty spread then I dont know what to tell you.
No we arent THAT bad but its pretty bad. Look at the position groups. QB- Well well below average. Probably 11th or 12th in the Pac.
RB-Average, maybe a tick above. Washington and Coleman could be a decent power back 1-2. Dotson is intriguing and might play a bigger role than we think. Gaskin will probably play which is kinda too bad but Christ atleast he might not shit the bed and fumble against Arizona like the 34 YO wet eyes.
WR-Far far below average. Certainly the very worst in the Pac.
OL-Horrific at the edges, perhaps ok in the middle. Below average.
If you think this offense based off personnel is best served running a faggoty spread then I dont know what to tell you.
No we arent THAT bad but its pretty bad. Look at the position groups. QB- Well well below average. Probably 11th or 12th in the Pac.
RB-Average, maybe a tick above. Washington and Coleman could be a decent power back 1-2. Dotson is intriguing and might play a bigger role than we think. Gaskin will probably play which is kinda too bad but Christ atleast he might not shit the bed and fumble against Arizona like the 34 YO wet eyes.
WR-Far far below average. Certainly the very worst in the Pac.
OL-Horrific at the edges, perhaps ok in the middle. Below average.
If you think this offense based off personnel is best served running a faggoty spread then I dont know what to tell you.
No we arent THAT bad but its pretty bad. Look at the position groups. QB- Well well below average. Probably 11th or 12th in the Pac.
RB-Average, maybe a tick above. Washington and Coleman could be a decent power back 1-2. Dotson is intriguing and might play a bigger role than we think. Gaskin will probably play which is kinda too bad but Christ atleast he might not shit the bed and fumble against Arizona like the 34 YO wet eyes.
WR-Far far below average. Certainly the very worst in the Pac.
OL-Horrific at the edges, perhaps ok in the middle. Below average.
If you think this offense based off personnel is best served running a faggoty spread then I dont know what to tell you.
I'm all for being jaded and not Doogin' but come on:
QB: are Oregon State, Washington State, UCLA, and Colorado in that much better shape? Only Colorado has a returner starter who started a majority of anyone's games (and Sefo threw 15 INTs and averaged 6.4 ypa).
RB: Agreed. After Oregon, USC, UCLA, and Arizona, we're probably in the next tier. We do have good depth and Dotson should surprise some people. Stanford, ASU, and Cal have some talent there too.
WR: Below average but man, have you seen what OSU, WSU, and Utah have (or don't have)? While Cajuste and Rector are pretty good, Stanford lost Montgomery and ASU lost Jaelen Strong so they aren't that much better. I like Mickens, hope RS-SR Hall can finally put it together but Pettis and Lenius are the key for the starting 4. Depth will be a concern though.
TE: Above average. Perkins and Daniels present mismatches in the passing game, sounds like Ajamu (6'5" 251 lbs) could be the answer for a blocking TE and still presents an option in the passing game. Sample is the #4 TE and more of a blocking guy too. If I'm JS, I want Perkins and Daniels on the field more than Hall and some true frosh WRs.
OL: Too much of an unknown on the edges to say "horrific", especially considering that RT Coleman Shelton sat out the spring. Strausser has sounded bullish on RS-JR Eldrenkamp and Matt James...James is at 273 lbs so if he can get up to 290 - 295, I wouldn't be surprised if he started over Shelton but I gathered James needs one more year of development.
If Charles can put it all together (including health), he could be an All Pac-12 guy, Tufunga is decent enough, and Brostek has gotten new life under Strausser. Sounds like Brostek could surprise some people and he's listed at 300 now (SarkAttackFS played him early at 275-280 lbs).
IIRC, WSU's OL returns all 5 guys but they sucked big wang last year. OSU's was bad too, Oregon lost their 3 best starters and Johnstone retired after his ACL injury (I like Crosby), Stanford will be decent but lost Peat, and Cal will be just ok. UCLA and USC will probably have some of the best OLs in the conference. ASU and Arizona will probably be around average to pretty good, Colorado's will suck again, and Utah's should be pretty decent.
So with all of that in mind, I'd have to put us in the bottom of the 2nd tier or as the best of the worst tier.
TL; DR...it's all relative so our crapola must be compared to other dreckfests around the league.
No we arent THAT bad but its pretty bad. Look at the position groups. QB- Well well below average. Probably 11th or 12th in the Pac.
RB-Average, maybe a tick above. Washington and Coleman could be a decent power back 1-2. Dotson is intriguing and might play a bigger role than we think. Gaskin will probably play which is kinda too bad but Christ atleast he might not shit the bed and fumble against Arizona like the 34 YO wet eyes.
WR-Far far below average. Certainly the very worst in the Pac.
OL-Horrific at the edges, perhaps ok in the middle. Below average.
If you think this offense based off personnel is best served running a faggoty spread then I dont know what to tell you.
Comments
Still can't believe we took a mediocre MWC QB coach and made him a PAC12 OC. Unbelievable.
The season is over.
. The spread is the only offense that will allow Lindy time to throw it at the feet of his WR's. It's used to overcome shortcomings elsewhere. Yeah, Johnny Smith's playcalling was the problem. Lining up in the I-formation is hardly a good idea with new starters at every position. Retarded, simply idiotic post.
Our new/young/Ossai OL will love pass blocking those rushers every play
how often did you roll around with Sark when he was up here? Why do you love his play book?
insert
Like in middle school football, you can play your biggest strongest kid at tailback and roll over the crappy disorganized teams but against a well-coached team, it won't work. Washington dominates the crap teams we play but can't do shit against the decent ones.
On the other hand you have Coleman who actually looks and plays like a RB but is slow as molasses with the ball.
Honestly I'm less excited about the RB position than I am about qb.
As for Smith, he needs to put something together that utilizes TEs, down field blocking, and short passes (not backwards screens across the field) in a major way if he's going to be successful with Lindquist.
Are we done here?
Well documented
QB- Well well below average. Probably 11th or 12th in the Pac.
RB-Average, maybe a tick above. Washington and Coleman could be a decent power back 1-2. Dotson is intriguing and might play a bigger role than we think. Gaskin will probably play which is kinda too bad but Christ atleast he might not shit the bed and fumble against Arizona like the 34 YO wet eyes.
WR-Far far below average. Certainly the very worst in the Pac.
OL-Horrific at the edges, perhaps ok in the middle. Below average.
If you think this offense based off personnel is best served running a faggoty spread then I dont know what to tell you.
QB- Well well below average. Probably 11th or 12th in the Pac.
RB-Average, maybe a tick above. Washington and Coleman could be a decent power back 1-2. Dotson is intriguing and might play a bigger role than we think. Gaskin will probably play which is kinda too bad but Christ atleast he might not shit the bed and fumble against Arizona like the 34 YO wet eyes.
WR-Far far below average. Certainly the very worst in the Pac.
OL-Horrific at the edges, perhaps ok in the middle. Below average.
If you think this offense based off personnel is best served running a faggoty spread then I dont know what to tell you.
QB- Well well below average. Probably 11th or 12th in the Pac.
RB-Average, maybe a tick above. Washington and Coleman could be a decent power back 1-2. Dotson is intriguing and might play a bigger role than we think. Gaskin will probably play which is kinda too bad but Christ atleast he might not shit the bed and fumble against Arizona like the 34 YO wet eyes.
WR-Far far below average. Certainly the very worst in the Pac.
OL-Horrific at the edges, perhaps ok in the middle. Below average.
If you think this offense based off personnel is best served running a faggoty spread then I dont know what to tell you.
QB- Well well below average. Probably 11th or 12th in the Pac.
RB-Average, maybe a tick above. Washington and Coleman could be a decent power back 1-2. Dotson is intriguing and might play a bigger role than we think. Gaskin will probably play which is kinda too bad but Christ atleast he might not shit the bed and fumble against Arizona like the 34 YO wet eyes.
WR-Far far below average. Certainly the very worst in the Pac.
OL-Horrific at the edges, perhaps ok in the middle. Below average.
If you think this offense based off personnel is best served running a faggoty spread then I dont know what to tell you.
QB: are Oregon State, Washington State, UCLA, and Colorado in that much better shape? Only Colorado has a returner starter who started a majority of anyone's games (and Sefo threw 15 INTs and averaged 6.4 ypa).
RB: Agreed. After Oregon, USC, UCLA, and Arizona, we're probably in the next tier. We do have good depth and Dotson should surprise some people. Stanford, ASU, and Cal have some talent there too.
WR: Below average but man, have you seen what OSU, WSU, and Utah have (or don't have)? While Cajuste and Rector are pretty good, Stanford lost Montgomery and ASU lost Jaelen Strong so they aren't that much better. I like Mickens, hope RS-SR Hall can finally put it together but Pettis and Lenius are the key for the starting 4. Depth will be a concern though.
TE: Above average. Perkins and Daniels present mismatches in the passing game, sounds like Ajamu (6'5" 251 lbs) could be the answer for a blocking TE and still presents an option in the passing game. Sample is the #4 TE and more of a blocking guy too. If I'm JS, I want Perkins and Daniels on the field more than Hall and some true frosh WRs.
OL: Too much of an unknown on the edges to say "horrific", especially considering that RT Coleman Shelton sat out the spring. Strausser has sounded bullish on RS-JR Eldrenkamp and Matt James...James is at 273 lbs so if he can get up to 290 - 295, I wouldn't be surprised if he started over Shelton but I gathered James needs one more year of development.
If Charles can put it all together (including health), he could be an All Pac-12 guy, Tufunga is decent enough, and Brostek has gotten new life under Strausser. Sounds like Brostek could surprise some people and he's listed at 300 now (SarkAttackFS played him early at 275-280 lbs).
IIRC, WSU's OL returns all 5 guys but they sucked big wang last year. OSU's was bad too, Oregon lost their 3 best starters and Johnstone retired after his ACL injury (I like Crosby), Stanford will be decent but lost Peat, and Cal will be just ok. UCLA and USC will probably have some of the best OLs in the conference. ASU and Arizona will probably be around average to pretty good, Colorado's will suck again, and Utah's should be pretty decent.
So with all of that in mind, I'd have to put us in the bottom of the 2nd tier or as the best of the worst tier.
TL; DR...it's all relative so our crapola must be compared to other dreckfests around the league.