Steve Sarkisian Ranked as 9th Best Coach in Pac-12
Comments
-
I'm sorry but I can't take a list where a guy is 24-4 with a national championship game appearance in two years -and they rank him 7th in the conference behind a guy who got ran out of Michigan on a rail.
-
priapism said:
Shaw isn't recruiting very well at the skill positions, I suspect Furd is going to go back to their losing ways soon...just stack the D on the line against Furd all game long now, they're out of receivers and TEs now.
I think Whittingham is a good coach for what athletes he has, but it would be wise for him to do what Riley did after this next season.
The Pirate has taken cuogin-it to the next level. I hope he keeps winning just enough not to be fired.
Mora and Sark are passive-aggressive, drama Quee. after a bad game. I'm glad they're both in LA.
Shaw isnt recruiting well?listen priapism, Shaw doesnt need to recruit 8 offensive skill guys. He wins with brute, just like a certain head coach and another a few decades ago at UW. We sniffed the rose bowl twice with Dave Janoski as the featured WR. Stanford has plenty. If you think Stanford is going to "go back to their losing ways", you are the most fucktarded poster here. Well actually you said it so you kinda are.
head on over to the Stanford Scout site, you know Scout well as you still pay them. look at Shaws TE and WR recruiting dipshit. Stanford isnt going anywhere. Especially this year. Theyve got a Dave Janoski on offense who actually threaten's defenses. Similar name to mcdonalds McCaffe.
For those who remember, dawgfans always said from late 90's to present day , that Oregon would take a step back when Akili Smith graduated...then Harrington graduated, then clemens, then dixon, then Masoli etc....get the fucking picture? Oregon, like Stanford, recruits roughly 5 OL and 2 TE's every year, that's why theyre not going anywhere. Doesnt matter who plays receiver.
They had 1 down year last year. Chrimony sakes. They have enough WR's on the roster to win the conference. One I wish Sark didnt lose to them. Head out ass.
-
Of course Neu won the Pac 12 South at 6-6 ...NeGgaPlEaSe said:puppylove_sugarsteel said:looked at UCLA under Mora? He won the south in his 2nd year. I dont think he's #3 (more like 4-5), but has an equal claim with Graham.
How is it again he can follow Neuheisel the program destroyer and make it to the Pac 12 South championship twice? Either Mora is a good coach, or Neu is not as bad as some think? -
A good coach with fire in his belly would see a list like this where they are ranked 9th and use it as motivation to work harder, and do anything possible to prove his doubters wrong. A coach like dude bruh will tell everybody he's going to prove his doubters wrong and expect to do it by not changing a thing and just being awesome.
-
I love that Graham and Rich Rod are #1 and #2 and have as many bcs wins combined (1) as slingblade. Pete should be up there but he does need to actually do something at uw first.
-
I love that Graham and Rich Rod are #1 and #2 and have as many bcs wins combined (1) as slingblade. Pete should be up there but he does need to actually do something at uw first.
-
9th best sounds better than 3rd worst
-
I love that Graham and Rich Rod are #1 and #2 and have as many bcs wins combined (1) as slingblade. Pete should be up there but he does need to actually do something at uw first.
-
That's because it is better. 9 > 10KoolAidMan said:9th best sounds better than 3rd worst
-
what I learned in this thread:
- Puppy's meds are dialed in
- Doogs gonna doog
The end. -
I'm hearing Sark is a Top 10 coach...
-
This sounds like @puppylove_sugarsteel has a topic for a front page article. @DerekJohnson, are you paying attention?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Listen, writers at Athlon are bottom of the barrel dipshits. Whoever put Rodriguez at #2 had brain freeze and squeaked that out their ass. Pretty obvious David Shaw deserves to be at the top. What to expect from east-coast SEC ball licking 'college football experts"
Back in the 90's Athlon was ok. Now its unreadable. You werent born then Tommy, J...trust me it was better then.
Has Rodriguez or Graham won the pac12 yet? Fuck no. By Athlon's logic Petersen should be #1. Shaw has won it twice, Billy Bob got to national title game. Rich Rod got to fiesta by default in horrible pac 12 south(Washington beat them, on their field at home, with Cyrus at QB...case closed), Graham has a holiday bowl and another wortless Tom Hansen bowl on his resume, whoopie-fucking-doo.
If Graham cant win a big game, and Arizona will never win the pac12, how did Athlon come to these conclusions? Just embarrassing to read this shit. If you wanted a real and accurate list of pac12 order, should have just asked puppy.
Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! Front Page! -
FREE PUB!!1!puppylove_sugarsteel said:Listen, writers at Athlon are bottom of the barrel dipshits. Whoever put Rodriguez at #2 had brain freeze and squeaked that out their ass. Pretty obvious David Shaw deserves to be at the top. What to expect from east-coast SEC ball licking 'college football experts"
Back in the 90's Athlon was ok. Now its unreadable. You werent born then Tommy, J...trust me it was better then.
Has Rodriguez or Graham won the pac12 yet? Fuck no. By Athlon's logic Petersen should be #1. Shaw has won it twice, Billy Bob got to national title game. Rich Rod got to fiesta by default in horrible pac 12 south(Washington beat them, on their field at home, with Cyrus at QB...case closed), Graham has a holiday bowl and another wortless Tom Hansen bowl on his resume, whoopie-fucking-doo.
If Graham cant win a big game, and Arizona will never win the pac12, how did Athlon come to these conclusions? Just embarrassing to read this shit. If you wanted a real and accurate list of pac12 order, should have just asked puppy.
Disagree.
The obsession continues.
-
You like to disagree Tommyfreeme,, but cant support your position with anything other than "free pub" or "I disagree". I think you like to be abused, which explains the gay thing. Does it hurt?
-
I'm not gay.puppylove_sugarsteel said:You like to disagree Tommyfreeme,, but cant support your position with anything other than "free pub" or "I disagree". I think you like to be abused, which explains the gay thing. Does it hurt?
Sorry to break your heart. -
You just break my balls
-
Disagree.puppylove_sugarsteel said:You like to disagree Tommyfreeme,, but cant support your position with anything other than "free pub" or "I disagree". I think you like to be abused, which explains the gay thing. Does it hurt?
-
End of discussion.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree.puppylove_sugarsteel said:You like to disagree Tommyfreeme,, but cant support your position with anything other than "free pub" or "I disagree". I think you like to be abused, which explains the gay thing. Does it hurt?