We passed it so now we get to find out what's in it

PurpleJ

washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/03/12/here-are-all-400-pages-of-the-fccs-net-neutrality-rules/

TL, DR. But I'm sure it will all work out. They have our best interests at heart.

2001400ex

@RaceBannon there is the text. So let me know your analysis when you are done reading it.

@d2d death, show us the 4 cartoons you see that let you know Obama is a communist tyrant

@puppylove_sugarsteel can't wait for your meds induced rant.

RaceBannon

Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it

RaceBannon

I just read it

I was right

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it

Read my comments for comprehension.

BennyBeaver

The FCC's net neutrality order seeks to prevent Internet providers from blocking Web traffic, slowing it down or setting up paid fast lanes. It reflects a year's worth of intense lobbying by carriers and Web companies — not to mention the public, whose 4 million written comments to the FCC helped convince the agency to adopt far more aggressive regulations.

Sounds good to me.

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it

Read my comments for comprehension.

I was right

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it

Read my comments for comprehension.

I was right

Tell that to Death.

ThomasFremont

Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

Just some of what's in there.

Fucktards.

2001400ex

Thanks Fremont for your analysis. You are dialed in as always.

@RaceBannon I'm still waiting for your analysis.

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

Thanks Fremont for your analysis. You are dialed in as always.

@RaceBannon I'm still waiting for your analysis.

I was right

RaceBannon

ThomasFremont said:

Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

Just some of what's in there.

Fucktards.

What about the rest? What are the procedures?

GrundleStiltzkin

Me not waiting. Splitskinner stop this faggy madness. And Poopsi, only you would read this doogman dung

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

Just some of what's in there.

Fucktards.

What about the rest? What are the procedures?

I thought you read it and were right?

You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory.

d2d

2001400ex said:

@RaceBannon there is the text. So let me know your analysis when you are done reading it.

@d2d death, show us the 4 cartoons you see that let you know Obama is a communist tyrant

@puppylove_sugarsteel can't wait for your meds induced rant.

You read 400 pages in 20 minutes? That degree in Swahili sure came in handy.

Still at work. I will read it tonight. Go fuck yourself until then.

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

Just some of what's in there.

Fucktards.

What about the rest? What are the procedures?

I thought you read it and were right?

You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory.

I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

Just some of what's in there.

Fucktards.

What about the rest? What are the procedures?

I thought you read it and were right?

You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory.

I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right

And I said they would release it. You argue like my wife does.

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

Just some of what's in there.

Fucktards.

What about the rest? What are the procedures?

I thought you read it and were right?

You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory.

I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right

And I said they would release it. You argue like my wife does.

No you didn't

BennyBeaver

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

Just some of what's in there.

Fucktards.

What about the rest? What are the procedures?

I thought you read it and were right?

You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory.

I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right

rayce: remove your tinfoil hat or stop smoking the paranoia weed

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

Just some of what's in there.

Fucktards.

What about the rest? What are the procedures?

I thought you read it and were right?

You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory.

I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right

And I said they would release it. You argue like my wife does.

No you didn't

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

Just some of what's in there.

Fucktards.

What about the rest? What are the procedures?

I thought you read it and were right?

You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory.

I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right

And I said they would release it. You argue like my wife does.

No you didn't