We passed it so now we get to find out what's in it
TL, DR. But I'm sure it will all work out. They have our best interests at heart.
Comments
-
@RaceBannon there is the text. So let me know your analysis when you are done reading it.
@d2d death, show us the 4 cartoons you see that let you know Obama is a communist tyrant
@puppylove_sugarsteel can't wait for your meds induced rant. -
Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it
-
I just read it
I was right -
Read my comments for comprehension.RaceBannon said:Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it
-
The FCC's net neutrality order seeks to prevent Internet providers from blocking Web traffic, slowing it down or setting up paid fast lanes. It reflects a year's worth of intense lobbying by carriers and Web companies — not to mention the public, whose 4 million written comments to the FCC helped convince the agency to adopt far more aggressive regulations.
Sounds good to me. -
I was right2001400ex said:
Read my comments for comprehension.RaceBannon said:Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it
-
Tell that to Death.RaceBannon said:
I was right2001400ex said:
Read my comments for comprehension.RaceBannon said:Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it
-
Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards. -
Thanks Fremont for your analysis. You are dialed in as always.
@RaceBannon I'm still waiting for your analysis. -
I was right2001400ex said:Thanks Fremont for your analysis. You are dialed in as always.
@RaceBannon I'm still waiting for your analysis. -
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
-
Me not waiting. Splitskinner stop this faggy madness. And Poopsi, only you would read this doogman dung
-
I thought you read it and were right?RaceBannon said:
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory. -
You read 400 pages in 20 minutes? That degree in Swahili sure came in handy.2001400ex said:@RaceBannon there is the text. So let me know your analysis when you are done reading it.
@d2d death, show us the 4 cartoons you see that let you know Obama is a communist tyrant
@puppylove_sugarsteel can't wait for your meds induced rant.
Still at work. I will read it tonight. Go fuck yourself until then. -
I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right2001400ex said:
I thought you read it and were right?RaceBannon said:
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory. -
And I said they would release it. You argue like my wife does.RaceBannon said:
I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right2001400ex said:
I thought you read it and were right?RaceBannon said:
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory. -
No you didn't2001400ex said:
And I said they would release it. You argue like my wife does.RaceBannon said:
I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right2001400ex said:
I thought you read it and were right?RaceBannon said:
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory. -
rayce: remove your tinfoil hat or stop smoking the paranoia weedRaceBannon said:
I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right2001400ex said:
I thought you read it and were right?RaceBannon said:
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory. -
RaceBannon said:
No you didn't2001400ex said:
And I said they would release it. You argue like my wife does.RaceBannon said:
I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right2001400ex said:
I thought you read it and were right?RaceBannon said:
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory.
-
RaceBannon said:
No you didn't2001400ex said:
And I said they would release it. You argue like my wife does.RaceBannon said:
I said it shouldn't be secret. I was right2001400ex said:
I thought you read it and were right?RaceBannon said:
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
You seem awfully pissed you bought right into the hype and conspiracy theory.
-
Grasping at straws...sad.RaceBannon said:
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
Nobody was ever arguing that it should be a secret. Stop trying to move the goalposts, Aubbie.
The secret is out. I was right and you were wrong. -
but, but Obama and the liberals!!!11!!ThomasFremont said:
Grasping at straws...sad.RaceBannon said:
What about the rest? What are the procedures?ThomasFremont said:Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.
The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.
Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
Nobody was ever arguing that it should be a secret. Stop trying to move the goalposts, Aubbie.
The secret is out. I was right and you were wrong. -
My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it. -
You've yet to make the case that net neutrality is a direct threat to my freedom, considering that I'm not operating from the anchoring belief that Obama is out to restrict said freedoms. But it's like you said, no one's opinions are changed by internet arguments.RaceBannon said:My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it. -
Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.RaceBannon said:My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.
Try checking the facts next time.
-
That's because I've never made any case about net neutrality. Hello?doogsinparadise said:
You've yet to make the case that net neutrality is a direct threat to my freedom, considering that I'm not operating from the anchoring belief that Obama is out to restrict said freedoms. But it's like you said, no one's opinions are changed by internet arguments.RaceBannon said:My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
Secret government is a threat to freedom something you guys would not deny if it were Bush.
That's been my point from the start. I am right.
You still don't know what's in there because you didn't read it anymore than I did. -
You accepted it without knowing what was in it. You still doThomasFremont said:
Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.RaceBannon said:My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.
Try checking the facts next time.
Who is the pawn? I think we all know the answer -
You are the pawn. I did my research to know what it is. Just because I didn't freak out like you did until I saw the bill. Doesn't mean I accepted anything. Do you need more screenshots?RaceBannon said:
You accepted it without knowing what was in it. You still doThomasFremont said:
Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.RaceBannon said:My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.
Try checking the facts next time.
Who is the pawn? I think we all know the answer -
I know what it is. You don't.RaceBannon said:
You accepted it without knowing what was in it. You still doThomasFremont said:
Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.RaceBannon said:My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.
Try checking the facts next time.
Who is the pawn? I think we all know the answer
But sure, the only person here who bothered researching it after it was released is the pawn.
Good one.
Are you taking cunt pills or something? -
I'm still right. Hondo and Tommy Hill lost this round rather easily
