Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We passed it so now we get to find out what's in it

2»

Comments

  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

    The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

    Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

    No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
    No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

    No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

    No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

    Just some of what's in there.

    Fucktards.

    What about the rest? What are the procedures?

    image
    Grasping at straws...sad.

    Nobody was ever arguing that it should be a secret. Stop trying to move the goalposts, Aubbie.

    The secret is out. I was right and you were wrong.
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346

    Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

    The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

    Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

    No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
    No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

    No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

    No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

    Just some of what's in there.

    Fucktards.

    What about the rest? What are the procedures?

    image
    Grasping at straws...sad.

    Nobody was ever arguing that it should be a secret. Stop trying to move the goalposts, Aubbie.

    The secret is out. I was right and you were wrong.
    but, but Obama and the liberals!!!11!!
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,341 Founders Club
    My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..

    I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..

    I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.

    You've yet to make the case that net neutrality is a direct threat to my freedom, considering that I'm not operating from the anchoring belief that Obama is out to restrict said freedoms. But it's like you said, no one's opinions are changed by internet arguments.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..

    I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.

    Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.

    The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.

    Try checking the facts next time.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,341 Founders Club

    My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..

    I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.

    You've yet to make the case that net neutrality is a direct threat to my freedom, considering that I'm not operating from the anchoring belief that Obama is out to restrict said freedoms. But it's like you said, no one's opinions are changed by internet arguments.
    That's because I've never made any case about net neutrality. Hello?

    Secret government is a threat to freedom something you guys would not deny if it were Bush.

    That's been my point from the start. I am right.

    You still don't know what's in there because you didn't read it anymore than I did.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,341 Founders Club

    My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..

    I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.

    Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.

    The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.

    Try checking the facts next time.
    You accepted it without knowing what was in it. You still do

    Who is the pawn? I think we all know the answer
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..

    I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.

    Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.

    The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.

    Try checking the facts next time.
    You accepted it without knowing what was in it. You still do

    Who is the pawn? I think we all know the answer
    You are the pawn. I did my research to know what it is. Just because I didn't freak out like you did until I saw the bill. Doesn't mean I accepted anything. Do you need more screenshots?
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..

    I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.

    Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.

    The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.

    Try checking the facts next time.
    You accepted it without knowing what was in it. You still do

    Who is the pawn? I think we all know the answer
    I know what it is. You don't.

    But sure, the only person here who bothered researching it after it was released is the pawn.

    Good one.

    Are you taking cunt pills or something?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,341 Founders Club
    I'm still right. Hondo and Tommy Hill lost this round rather easily
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    I'm still right. Hondo and Tommy Hill lost this round rather easily

    Lol. Now you bring jokes?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,341 Founders Club
    I'm serious. I was joking before. Not surprised you didn't get it
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    I'm serious. I was joking before. Not surprised you didn't get it

    You are butt hurt you bought into the fear of the right wing media.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,341 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    I'm serious. I was joking before. Not surprised you didn't get it

    You are butt hurt you bought into the fear of the right wing media.
    No. I'm not.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    I'm serious. I was joking before. Not surprised you didn't get it

    You are butt hurt you bought into the fear of the right wing media.
    No. I'm not.
    That speaks volumes.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,341 Founders Club
    No. It doesn't.
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    I just read this thread

    image

    image
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,341 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    I just read this thread

    image

    image

    Huh?
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    I'm still right. Hondo and Tommy Hill lost this round rather easily

    FREE PUB!!1!
Sign In or Register to comment.