No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
What about the rest? What are the procedures?
Grasping at straws...sad.
Nobody was ever arguing that it should be a secret. Stop trying to move the goalposts, Aubbie.
The secret is out. I was right and you were wrong.
No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.
No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.
Just some of what's in there.
Fucktards.
What about the rest? What are the procedures?
Grasping at straws...sad.
Nobody was ever arguing that it should be a secret. Stop trying to move the goalposts, Aubbie.
The secret is out. I was right and you were wrong.
My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
You've yet to make the case that net neutrality is a direct threat to my freedom, considering that I'm not operating from the anchoring belief that Obama is out to restrict said freedoms. But it's like you said, no one's opinions are changed by internet arguments.
My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.
The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.
My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
You've yet to make the case that net neutrality is a direct threat to my freedom, considering that I'm not operating from the anchoring belief that Obama is out to restrict said freedoms. But it's like you said, no one's opinions are changed by internet arguments.
That's because I've never made any case about net neutrality. Hello?
Secret government is a threat to freedom something you guys would not deny if it were Bush.
That's been my point from the start. I am right.
You still don't know what's in there because you didn't read it anymore than I did.
My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.
The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.
Try checking the facts next time.
You accepted it without knowing what was in it. You still do
My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.
The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.
Try checking the facts next time.
You accepted it without knowing what was in it. You still do
Who is the pawn? I think we all know the answer
You are the pawn. I did my research to know what it is. Just because I didn't freak out like you did until I saw the bill. Doesn't mean I accepted anything. Do you need more screenshots?
My argument all along was that it shouldn't be secret. You still don't know what's in it and you're back to claiming it's great..
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
Nobody was arguing that it should be a secret. Stop being a fucktard.
The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.
Try checking the facts next time.
You accepted it without knowing what was in it. You still do
Who is the pawn? I think we all know the answer
I know what it is. You don't.
But sure, the only person here who bothered researching it after it was released is the pawn.
Comments
Nobody was ever arguing that it should be a secret. Stop trying to move the goalposts, Aubbie.
The secret is out. I was right and you were wrong.
I was right. Obama can do no wrong in your loving eyes. Just admit it.
The Verizon/ATT/Comcast sponsored rhetoric about this being a 400 page tyrannical government takeover of the internet was wrong. But you ran with it like a good little pawn.
Try checking the facts next time.
Secret government is a threat to freedom something you guys would not deny if it were Bush.
That's been my point from the start. I am right.
You still don't know what's in there because you didn't read it anymore than I did.
Who is the pawn? I think we all know the answer
But sure, the only person here who bothered researching it after it was released is the pawn.
Good one.
Are you taking cunt pills or something?