Wilner Woodshed's the Pac12 Network
Comments
-
WTF?!? I mean WTF!!!!SpoonieLuv said:
I drop an Ashley Adamson reference and it gets one upvote and one WTF!.
Somebody else drops pics of Larry Fucking Scott and they get two Awesomes.
That's just wrong.
-
Why would you want to watch college baseball when you could in the mountains, on your boat, chilling on the beach, etc.Tequilla said:The bottom line is that most of the schools in the Big 10 and SEC are totally invested in everything about their schools ... in the PAC we have so many other interests that we're not invested in sitting down on Saturday afternoon and planning our time around the baseball team.
Think about it this way ... LSU fills up 10k per game for baseball. PAC schools? Not so much. That's one of the biggest differences.
Of course, the other primary difference is that those outside of the West Coast could care less about the PAC for the most part ... whereas people from around the country have ties to the Big 10 and SEC. -
Mine movesPurpleThrobber said:
WTF?!? I mean WTF!!!!SpoonieLuv said:
I drop an Ashley Adamson reference and it gets one upvote and one WTF!.
Somebody else drops pics of Larry Fucking Scott and they get two Awesomes.
That's just wrong.
-
In two years, the Big Ten will have a new Tier I deal, and it’s expected to be a whopper.
Until it's the P12's turn to renew, when it will again (briefly) have the most lucrative TV deal. Then the SEC will trump it, then the BTen will trump that, and so on ad infinitum. The key word here is "cycle."
At that point, the cycle will be complete. All the leagues will have renegotiated their deals in the era of soaring rights, and the Pac-12 could very well be in the same position it was five years ago relative to the SEC and Big Ten:
That position is millions of dollars behind on a per-school basis.
How is any of this evidence of Larry Scott's incompetence? At least he's got the Pac in that top 3 group, well ahead of the B12s and ACCs of the college world. -
How is any of this evidence of Larry Scott's incompetence? At least he's got the Pac in that top 3 group, well ahead of the B12s and ACCs of the college world.TTJ said:In two years, the Big Ten will have a new Tier I deal, and it’s expected to be a whopper.
At that point, the cycle will be complete. All the leagues will have renegotiated their deals in the era of soaring rights, and the Pac-12 could very well be in the same position it was five years ago relative to the SEC and Big Ten:
That position is millions of dollars behind on a per-school basis.
Are you new or related to Fleenor? The Pac12 network sucks.
HTH -
You realize you just proved my point?doogsinparadise said:
Why would you want to watch college baseball when you could in the mountains, on your boat, chilling on the beach, etc.Tequilla said:The bottom line is that most of the schools in the Big 10 and SEC are totally invested in everything about their schools ... in the PAC we have so many other interests that we're not invested in sitting down on Saturday afternoon and planning our time around the baseball team.
Think about it this way ... LSU fills up 10k per game for baseball. PAC schools? Not so much. That's one of the biggest differences.
Of course, the other primary difference is that those outside of the West Coast could care less about the PAC for the most part ... whereas people from around the country have ties to the Big 10 and SEC. -
Meh. There's a lot of things I'd change if I was running the network. But it's making money for the league.MisterEm said:Are you new or related to Fleenor? The Pac12 network sucks. HTH
-
Jesus Christ.Tequilla said:The bottom line is that most of the schools in the Big 10 and SEC are totally invested in everything about their schools ... in the PAC we have so many other interests that we're not invested in sitting down on Saturday afternoon and planning our time around the baseball team.
Think about it this way ... LSU fills up 10k per game for baseball. PAC schools? Not so much. That's one of the biggest differences.
Of course, the other primary difference is that those outside of the West Coast could care less about the PAC for the most part ... whereas people from around the country have ties to the Big 10 and SEC.
This is about as stupid a fucking statement as I have ever seen you type.
Are you saying people from the Pac don't ever leave the west coast?
Jesus. -
No - what I'm saying is that we don't quite have that built in gung ho unbridled support and interest in ALL of the programs and going ons as those in other parts of the country. Those in the SEC tend to revolve around what is going on with their schools.
-
So if you’re scoring at home, we have these projections for TV-related revenue for 2017-18, on a per-school basis:
SEC: $35.6 million
Big Ten: $33 million
Pac-12: $22.95 million
shit guys, in poor flyover states, they have nothing but football so it make sense they get more scrilla.
if im larry scott (which im glad im not), im not overly pissed here*.
if im mike slive im thinking "we only get $2.6mm more than the b0g? what the fuck am i doing wrong? what the fuck is jim delany doing right?"
*$10mm less per school for the p12 vs the b0g is a shit deal, i aint sayin its not.
