Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Lynch or Suh?

135

Comments

  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Tequilla said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Mebane has to go. No point to paying a two down, run stopping DT 5+ million, especially when the team went 8-2 without him. Getting to the passer was a bigger problem than stopping the run.

    Particularly when the potential replacement does BOTH
    Suh isn't a potential replacement.

    hth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Tequilla said:

    Are Wilson's legs going to go in the next year or two? Sounds like the general talking head that questions Wilson's performance.

    And regarding Lynch, you put a deal together that is consistent with his projected performance or you go short-term deals. If you work together, a deal can be found that is fair for both parties.

    I'm not questioning what he has done. I am concerned about him being able to keep doing it the way our O-line lets him get hammered back there.

    I'm not questioning his toughness or performance. I just want him to be able to keep doing it for another decade plus.

    Nobody thought Bo Jackson's career would end the way it did. But shit happens. A smart GM protects his franchise QB as much as possible.

    That means as few hits as possible. During the Green Bay game, they threw up a stat that Wilson had dropped back 15 times, and was hit, knocked down, or sacked 14 of those times. It's not about just protecting him, it's about giving the offense time to run a play.

    A good o-line would help more than a star DT.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    Lynch should go to New England. One last shot at a title in Title Town USA.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    PurpleJ said:

    Lynch should go to New England. One last shot at a title in Title Town USA.

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    I would roll the dice Lynch has one more year in him.

    That fucker is the spark plug that gets the offense going.

    How many times did we see the offense plodding along and then Lynch kicks in a huge run and it just all starts rolling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,416 Standard Supporter
    topdawgnc said:

    I would roll the dice Lynch has one more year in him.

    That fucker is the spark plug that gets the offense going.

    How many times did we see the offense plodding along and then Lynch kicks in a huge run and it just all starts rolling.

    This. Next year's team needs Lynch. It's time to start formulating a plan for the post Lynch era.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    dnc said:

    If it's a straight either/or you take Suh without giving it a second thought. Add five years of Suh to the guys you already have locked in on that defense and you're winning more than one more ring.

    But as @sarktastic noted, that's not the equation. Suh is going to command Wilson money if not more. Suh means no Wagner extension, no receiving upgrade, no offensive line upgrade, nothing.

    I just don't see how it's at all realistic.

    Regardless, with all the money the Hawks are having to spend they MUST hit on the draft this year. Their past few drafts have been decent, but they really need to find some savings by drafting starters in the draft. That will help the cap space more than anything. The draft is HUGE for the Seahawks this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    edited February 2015
    Run a fucking dive instead of a slant on second down and this question would be retarded. Now...........it's just a stupid question. I'll take a difference maker who touches the ball 25-30 times a game vs almost any defensive player. Offensive individual playmaker>>>>>>>>>>>defensive individual playmaker
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    greenblood said:

    Run a fucking dive instead of a slant on second down and this question would be retarded. Now...........it's just a stupid question. I'll take a difference maker who touches the ball 25-30 times a game vs almost any defensive player. Offensive individual playmaker>>>>>>>>>>>defensive individual playmaker

    I guess you must have missed the BRILLIANT thread where advanced metrics for fucktards PROVED that passing on 2nd and G at the 1 was the right call.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    PurpleJ said:

    greenblood said:

    Run a fucking dive instead of a slant on second down and this question would be retarded. Now...........it's just a stupid question. I'll take a difference maker who touches the ball 25-30 times a game vs almost any defensive player. Offensive individual playmaker>>>>>>>>>>>defensive individual playmaker

    I guess you must have missed the BRILLIANT thread where advanced metrics for fucktards PROVED that passing on 2nd and G at the 1 was the right call.
    Math h8r.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter