Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kearse has problems

245

Comments

  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Gladstone said:

    Be that as it may he always makes big plays in big games. Always.

    You are right stoneless, but great WR's catch most everything thrown within their reach. Kearse does not, which is why he was and is a free agent WR. Catch some drop some. Resign him for dolla's? Fuck no!
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812

    Gladstone said:

    Be that as it may he always makes big plays in big games. Always.

    You are right stoneless, but great WR's catch most everything thrown within their reach. Kearse does not, which is why he was and is a free agent WR. Catch some drop some. Resign him for dolla's? Fuck no!
    I know I didn't make all my plays, but when they count, I MAKE 'EM.
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098
    Some doog congrats on FB
    image
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,537 Founders Club
    Arms too veiny.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954

    Thats why you read my shit . Nothin but the best

    Stop plagiarizing the Fox graphics fucko
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    PurpleJ said:

    Arms too veiny.

    Such fag J.
  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,764 Swaye's Wigwam
    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    I think at least 25 team's #1 WR. Some of those teams have two or three guys I would take over Kearse.
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,626 Founders Club
    edited January 2015
    It's really too bad Richardson went down just as he was starting to emerge because this team really could use another threat. I still like his game, but looking back I would have picked Jarvis Landry, Moncrief, Josh Huff, or Devonte Allen over Richardson.

    Kearse has proven to make spectacular plays mixed with head scratching drops. I just like the gamer mentality he has. You can't teach that quality.

    In crunch time, some people hyper focus and others crumble. Maybe that means I over value him, but he's proven he's better than the numbers and would take him over a lot of guys that "on paper" don't make sense.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,326 Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    It's really too bad Richardson went down just as he was starting to emerge because this team really could use another threat. I still like his game, but looking back I would have picked Jarvis Landry, Moncrief, Josh Huff, or Devonte Allen over Richardson.

    Kearse has proven to make spectacular plays mixed with head scratching drops. I just like the gamer mentality he has. You can't teach that quality.

    In crunch time, some people hyper focus and others crumble. Maybe that means I over value him, but he's proven he's better than the numbers and would take him over a lot of guys that "on paper" don't make sense.

    You're not overvaluing him, you're just not too damn stubborn to recognize that he contributes and that he does it when it matters most, which makes him different, it separates him in that way. He's not a #1 WR, and he has problems with consistency, but to say he's average is off base. Average players don't step up like that.
  • SpoonieLuvSpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,459

    What do you know, the most important drive o f the game and the ball goes through KEARSE'S hands again for another pick. All 4 picks thrown by Wilson were to Kearse. Cut his cunt. Cost hawks the superbowl. On a positive note, Im glad the 12's will have a shitty day tomorra

    It's tomorra

    image
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter

    Gladstone said:

    Be that as it may he always makes big plays in big games. Always.

    You are right stoneless, but great WR's catch most everything thrown within their reach. Kearse does not, which is why he was and is a free agent WR. Catch some drop some. Resign him for dolla's? Fuck no!
    image
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,348 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Yep. I don't get this debate. Kearse is good enough to wear a uniform and be a part of an offense. He'll make some nice plays. He's just a role player at WR though. Debating how he stacks up against any team's #1 WR and most teams' #2 WR is senseless though. He's not good enough to be measured against those guys. I think he's been really fortunate to land where he has and may not be able to hang onto a full time job if Seattle doesn't keep him around.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    dnc said:

    Gladstone said:

    Be that as it may he always makes big plays in big games. Always.

    You are right stoneless, but great WR's catch most everything thrown within their reach. Kearse does not, which is why he was and is a free agent WR. Catch some drop some. Resign him for dolla's? Fuck no!
    I know I didn't make all my plays, but when they count, I MAKE 'EM.
    Cricket?
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    dnc said:

    Gladstone said:

    Be that as it may he always makes big plays in big games. Always.

    You are right stoneless, but great WR's catch most everything thrown within their reach. Kearse does not, which is why he was and is a free agent WR. Catch some drop some. Resign him for dolla's? Fuck no!
    I know I didn't make all my plays, but when they count, I MAKE 'EM.
    Cricket?
    No one hits big sixes better than Kearse.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,252
    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Dude can't get it through his head that you aren't get to get ANY team's #1 for the half million we pay Kearse. So now you have a #1 WR and no Avril, or Wright or someone else on defense that costs money and produces.

    This whole discussion is fucking gay (75). Kearse made a hella catch and the Hawks are going back to the Super Bowl - so if you have some shit you want to talk, talk it about some motherfucker who ISN'T going to the Super Bowl after making a great catch.

Sign In or Register to comment.