Helfrich and Coker are different. This isnt Chip's roster. Coker took over a returning juggernaut. Other than Fife not being better than Harrington Oregon always comes up with a QB. Mariota is a system QB. Maybe the best ever but not irreplaceable. Rogers replaced Farve and Young replaced Montana.
Helfrich has proved a lot this year. Petersen hasn't. But AZ is also right in that no one was turning uw in one year.
Petersen has to do something next year to give us hope. Like finding a fucking QB that can play. And actually changing the loser culture even if they lose 4 or 5 games again
I Iike to point to extreme outliers like Montana to Young and Favre to Rodgers as if this happens everyday.
It's what I like to do.
I could have listed every Oregon qb since 1989 instead
Helfrich makes it to the natty with Chip's roster in year 2.
What inherent truths were we supposed to pull out of these results again?
All rank speculation at this point, but the "Helfrich is Chip paint fumes + Mariota" routine is lazy. What has Peterman done to improve the program in Seattle to date? If you look at another similar rebuild at Texas, you can see Strong having done a 180 with the defense and cut tons of dead wood even if the team still has a ways to go. UW looks mentally weak, the QB development was atrocious. I find it hard to believe there isn't one serviceable D-1A QB on that roster.
There's not some magic badass powder that emanates from the fucking blue field that keeps Boise being Boise while coaches leave and fail. That is why Mosster is so fucking stupid, and anyone else who tries to connect Petersen to Cudder and Hookins. UW is much more supportive and fruitful for building a program than fucking Colorado and ASU, for reasons that have been iterated here over and over.
It's not a secret, Boise has a winning culture, just like Oregon. It's a matter of changing the culture of UW from one of losing, and that's fucking hard to do. Hence good coaches coming in cleaning house while having mediocre to bad years in year 1. Helfrich hasn't had to change a culture or even deal with any adversity at that program yet.
So if Woodmert hired Urban Meyer do you think he would have went 8-6 with not even a fucking shred of a D-1 QB at the end of the season then had the team come out asleep for the bowl game?
Helfrich makes it to the natty with Chip's roster in year 2.
What inherent truths were we supposed to pull out of these results again?
All rank speculation at this point, but the "Helfrich is Chip paint fumes + Mariota" routine is lazy. What has Peterman done to improve the program in Seattle to date? If you look at another similar rebuild at Texas, you can see Strong having done a 180 with the defense and cut tons of dead wood even if the team still has a ways to go. UW looks mentally weak, the QB development was atrocious. I find it hard to believe there isn't one serviceable D-1A QB on that roster.
There's not some magic badass powder that emanates from the fucking blue field that keeps Boise being Boise while coaches leave and fail. That is why Mosster is so fucking stupid, and anyone else who tries to connect Petersen to Cudder and Hookins. UW is much more supportive and fruitful for building a program than fucking Colorado and ASU, for reasons that have been iterated here over and over.
It's not a secret, Boise has a winning culture, just like Oregon. It's a matter of changing the culture of UW from one of losing, and that's fucking hard to do. Hence good coaches coming in cleaning house while having mediocre to bad years in year 1. Helfrich hasn't had to change a culture or even deal with any adversity at that program yet.
So if Woodmert hired Urban Meyer do you think he would have went 8-6 with not even a fucking shred of a D-1 QB at the end of the season then had the team come out asleep for the bowl game?
Fuck off with the hypothetical bullshit. Who knows? Maybe he'd do a little better, no way to tell how he'd even begin to fix this shitshow. but what a meaningless fucking talking point. I do know that with Dick Rod, UW would have rolled through every team and would have been a perfect 15-0. I learned that from the most hardcore duck/wildcat/college football fan in America.
When Boise lost its opener it's 'Oh look how shitty Boise is now with Pete's players. Pete has clearly skipped town and cashed in for a last payday.'
Then Boise finishes their season and it's 'Oh look it's all about Boise, they win no matter who the coach is.'
Well all we know for certain is Boise is still doing what they've been doing since the late 90's and UW is still doing what they've been doing since the late 90's.
Nothing is concrete yet, but it's fair to assume Peterman is a system coach.
Like Rich Rod? :-*
No. Rich Rod took over a fucking awful West Virginia program and had them in a BCS bowl very quickly. They're basically back to dreck now with the occasional big win. Arizona went from awful to dreck with the occasional big win under the Wrong Stoops. Insert Rich Rod and they are in a BCS bowl after three years.
Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference because he is. Slingblade took over a program going 1,0000mph in the right direction and Peterman was just a cog in the already well oiled machine. Shaw took over a program steam rolling in the right direction. Rich Rod has taken garbage programs to BCS Bowls in a short time twice. No one has even close to that kind of resume in the conference.
When you don't need to fundraise or work very hard at recruiting, or work to get kids to believe in what you are doing you can just focus on being a football coach which means you don't need the entire package like an Urban Meyer to win.
Helfrich makes it to the natty with Chip's roster in year 2.
What inherent truths were we supposed to pull out of these results again?
All rank speculation at this point, but the "Helfrich is Chip paint fumes + Mariota" routine is lazy. What has Peterman done to improve the program in Seattle to date? If you look at another similar rebuild at Texas, you can see Strong having done a 180 with the defense and cut tons of dead wood even if the team still has a ways to go. UW looks mentally weak, the QB development was atrocious. I find it hard to believe there isn't one serviceable D-1A QB on that roster.
There's not some magic badass powder that emanates from the fucking blue field that keeps Boise being Boise while coaches leave and fail. That is why Mosster is so fucking stupid, and anyone else who tries to connect Petersen to Cudder and Hookins. UW is much more supportive and fruitful for building a program than fucking Colorado and ASU, for reasons that have been iterated here over and over.
It's not a secret, Boise has a winning culture, just like Oregon. It's a matter of changing the culture of UW from one of losing, and that's fucking hard to do. Hence good coaches coming in cleaning house while having mediocre to bad years in year 1. Helfrich hasn't had to change a culture or even deal with any adversity at that program yet.
So if Woodmert hired Urban Meyer do you think he would have went 8-6 with not even a fucking shred of a D-1 QB at the end of the season then had the team come out asleep for the bowl game?
Meyer is going to the title game with his 3rd string QB.
Helfrich makes it to the natty with Chip's roster in year 2.
What inherent truths were we supposed to pull out of these results again?
All rank speculation at this point, but the "Helfrich is Chip paint fumes + Mariota" routine is lazy. What has Peterman done to improve the program in Seattle to date? If you look at another similar rebuild at Texas, you can see Strong having done a 180 with the defense and cut tons of dead wood even if the team still has a ways to go. UW looks mentally weak, the QB development was atrocious. I find it hard to believe there isn't one serviceable D-1A QB on that roster.
There's not some magic badass powder that emanates from the fucking blue field that keeps Boise being Boise while coaches leave and fail. That is why Mosster is so fucking stupid, and anyone else who tries to connect Petersen to Cudder and Hookins. UW is much more supportive and fruitful for building a program than fucking Colorado and ASU, for reasons that have been iterated here over and over.
It's not a secret, Boise has a winning culture, just like Oregon. It's a matter of changing the culture of UW from one of losing, and that's fucking hard to do. Hence good coaches coming in cleaning house while having mediocre to bad years in year 1. Helfrich hasn't had to change a culture or even deal with any adversity at that program yet.
So if Woodmert hired Urban Meyer do you think he would have went 8-6 with not even a fucking shred of a D-1 QB at the end of the season then had the team come out asleep for the bowl game?
Fuck off with the hypothetical bullshit. Who knows? Maybe he'd do a little better, no way to tell how he'd even begin to fix this shitshow. but what a meaningless fucking talking point. I do know that with Dick Rod, UW would have rolled through every team and would have been a perfect 15-0. I learned that from the most hardcore duck/wildcat/college football fan in America.
When Boise lost its opener it's 'Oh look how shitty Boise is now with Pete's players. Pete has clearly skipped town and cashed in for a last payday.'
Then Boise finishes their season and it's 'Oh look it's all about Boise, they win no matter who the coach is.'
Which is it coogs and quooks?
Pretty simple answer, why did Auburn win the National Title in 2010? Gus Malzahn. They realized that and "fixed the glitch." First year with Gus back and they are playing for a title.
Pete's OC leaves, the program takes a down turn, Pete leaves, the OC comes back as the head man and by the end of year one they win another BCS Bowl.
If Peterman went to Oregon every Doog would be spouting off about how he is another Diggler/Hawkins. Luckily for us Quooks he went to UW so now we're telling you that after 12 months that a defense littered with All-Americans could never win you a big game, your QB play started and finished with awful, and recruiting isn't very good. OKG's can't tackle Royce Freeman, fucking stud football players have to do it.
Sark was a shit bird that won 9 games. Peterman is awesome at 8 wins with 4 gimmes?
Your program didn't take one step in a positive direction, you will be less talented next year, Oregon State just got better at the head coaching spot, and Oregon is about to win a National Championship with the most ridiculous infrastructure ever imagined to not take a step back.
Not one thing about Peterman's career suggests he can turn something around and nothing about this year suggest it has started.
Helfrich makes it to the natty with Chip's roster in year 2.
What inherent truths were we supposed to pull out of these results again?
All rank speculation at this point, but the "Helfrich is Chip paint fumes + Mariota" routine is lazy. What has Peterman done to improve the program in Seattle to date? If you look at another similar rebuild at Texas, you can see Strong having done a 180 with the defense and cut tons of dead wood even if the team still has a ways to go. UW looks mentally weak, the QB development was atrocious. I find it hard to believe there isn't one serviceable D-1A QB on that roster.
There's not some magic badass powder that emanates from the fucking blue field that keeps Boise being Boise while coaches leave and fail. That is why Mosster is so fucking stupid, and anyone else who tries to connect Petersen to Cudder and Hookins. UW is much more supportive and fruitful for building a program than fucking Colorado and ASU, for reasons that have been iterated here over and over.
It's not a secret, Boise has a winning culture, just like Oregon. It's a matter of changing the culture of UW from one of losing, and that's fucking hard to do. Hence good coaches coming in cleaning house while having mediocre to bad years in year 1. Helfrich hasn't had to change a culture or even deal with any adversity at that program yet.
So if Woodmert hired Urban Meyer do you think he would have went 8-6 with not even a fucking shred of a D-1 QB at the end of the season then had the team come out asleep for the bowl game?
Fuck off with the hypothetical bullshit. Who knows? Maybe he'd do a little better, no way to tell how he'd even begin to fix this shitshow. but what a meaningless fucking talking point. I do know that with Dick Rod, UW would have rolled through every team and would have been a perfect 15-0. I learned that from the most hardcore duck/wildcat/college football fan in America.
When Boise lost its opener it's 'Oh look how shitty Boise is now with Pete's players. Pete has clearly skipped town and cashed in for a last payday.'
Then Boise finishes their season and it's 'Oh look it's all about Boise, they win no matter who the coach is.'
Which is it coogs and quooks?
Pretty simple answer, why did Auburn win the National Title in 2010? Gus Malzahn. They realized that and "fixed the glitch." First year with Gus back and they are playing for a title.
Pete's OC leaves, the program takes a down turn, Pete leaves, the OC comes back as the head man and by the end of year one they win another BCS Bowl.
If Peterman went to Oregon every Doog would be spouting off about how he is another Diggler/Hawkins. Luckily for us Quooks he went to UW so now we're telling you that after 12 months that a defense littered with All-Americans could never win you a big game, your QB play started and finished with awful, and recruiting isn't very good. OKG's can't tackle Royce Freeman, fucking stud football players have to do it.
Sark was a shit bird that won 9 games. Peterman is awesome at 8 wins with 4 gimmes?
Your program didn't take one step in a positive direction, you will be less talented next year, Oregon State just got better at the head coaching spot, and Oregon is about to win a National Championship with the most ridiculous infrastructure ever imagined to not take a step back.
Not one thing about Peterman's career suggests he can turn something around and nothing about this year suggest it has started.
If you think Peterman couldn't win with Mariota, you deserve to watch the Buckeyes win 66-0.
Helfrich makes it to the natty with Chip's roster in year 2.
What inherent truths were we supposed to pull out of these results again?
All rank speculation at this point, but the "Helfrich is Chip paint fumes + Mariota" routine is lazy. What has Peterman done to improve the program in Seattle to date? If you look at another similar rebuild at Texas, you can see Strong having done a 180 with the defense and cut tons of dead wood even if the team still has a ways to go. UW looks mentally weak, the QB development was atrocious. I find it hard to believe there isn't one serviceable D-1A QB on that roster.
There's not some magic badass powder that emanates from the fucking blue field that keeps Boise being Boise while coaches leave and fail. That is why Mosster is so fucking stupid, and anyone else who tries to connect Petersen to Cudder and Hookins. UW is much more supportive and fruitful for building a program than fucking Colorado and ASU, for reasons that have been iterated here over and over.
It's not a secret, Boise has a winning culture, just like Oregon. It's a matter of changing the culture of UW from one of losing, and that's fucking hard to do. Hence good coaches coming in cleaning house while having mediocre to bad years in year 1. Helfrich hasn't had to change a culture or even deal with any adversity at that program yet.
So if Woodmert hired Urban Meyer do you think he would have went 8-6 with not even a fucking shred of a D-1 QB at the end of the season then had the team come out asleep for the bowl game?
Fuck off with the hypothetical bullshit. Who knows? Maybe he'd do a little better, no way to tell how he'd even begin to fix this shitshow. but what a meaningless fucking talking point. I do know that with Dick Rod, UW would have rolled through every team and would have been a perfect 15-0. I learned that from the most hardcore duck/wildcat/college football fan in America.
When Boise lost its opener it's 'Oh look how shitty Boise is now with Pete's players. Pete has clearly skipped town and cashed in for a last payday.'
Then Boise finishes their season and it's 'Oh look it's all about Boise, they win no matter who the coach is.'
Which is it coogs and quooks?
Pretty simple answer, why did Auburn win the National Title in 2010? Gus Malzahn. They realized that and "fixed the glitch." First year with Gus back and they are playing for a title.
Pete's OC leaves, the program takes a down turn, Pete leaves, the OC comes back as the head man and by the end of year one they win another BCS Bowl.
If Peterman went to Oregon every Doog would be spouting off about how he is another Diggler/Hawkins. Luckily for us Quooks he went to UW so now we're telling you that after 12 months that a defense littered with All-Americans could never win you a big game, your QB play started and finished with awful, and recruiting isn't very good. OKG's can't tackle Royce Freeman, fucking stud football players have to do it.
Sark was a shit bird that won 9 games. Peterman is awesome at 8 wins with 4 gimmes?
Your program didn't take one step in a positive direction, you will be less talented next year, Oregon State just got better at the head coaching spot, and Oregon is about to win a National Championship with the most ridiculous infrastructure ever imagined to not take a step back.
Not one thing about Peterman's career suggests he can turn something around and nothing about this year suggest it has started.
Stopped reading here. No, I would not be spouting off like a moron, I'd be shitting my doogy fucking pants at the thought of Pete being at Oregon.
Helfrich makes it to the natty with Chip's roster in year 2.
What inherent truths were we supposed to pull out of these results again?
All rank speculation at this point, but the "Helfrich is Chip paint fumes + Mariota" routine is lazy. What has Peterman done to improve the program in Seattle to date? If you look at another similar rebuild at Texas, you can see Strong having done a 180 with the defense and cut tons of dead wood even if the team still has a ways to go. UW looks mentally weak, the QB development was atrocious. I find it hard to believe there isn't one serviceable D-1A QB on that roster.
There's not some magic badass powder that emanates from the fucking blue field that keeps Boise being Boise while coaches leave and fail. That is why Mosster is so fucking stupid, and anyone else who tries to connect Petersen to Cudder and Hookins. UW is much more supportive and fruitful for building a program than fucking Colorado and ASU, for reasons that have been iterated here over and over.
It's not a secret, Boise has a winning culture, just like Oregon. It's a matter of changing the culture of UW from one of losing, and that's fucking hard to do. Hence good coaches coming in cleaning house while having mediocre to bad years in year 1. Helfrich hasn't had to change a culture or even deal with any adversity at that program yet.
So if Woodmert hired Urban Meyer do you think he would have went 8-6 with not even a fucking shred of a D-1 QB at the end of the season then had the team come out asleep for the bowl game?
Fuck off with the hypothetical bullshit. Who knows? Maybe he'd do a little better, no way to tell how he'd even begin to fix this shitshow. but what a meaningless fucking talking point. I do know that with Dick Rod, UW would have rolled through every team and would have been a perfect 15-0. I learned that from the most hardcore duck/wildcat/college football fan in America.
When Boise lost its opener it's 'Oh look how shitty Boise is now with Pete's players. Pete has clearly skipped town and cashed in for a last payday.'
Then Boise finishes their season and it's 'Oh look it's all about Boise, they win no matter who the coach is.'
Which is it coogs and quooks?
Pretty simple answer, why did Auburn win the National Title in 2010? Gus Malzahn. They realized that and "fixed the glitch." First year with Gus back and they are playing for a title.
Pete's OC leaves, the program takes a down turn, Pete leaves, the OC comes back as the head man and by the end of year one they win another BCS Bowl.
If Peterman went to Oregon every Doog would be spouting off about how he is another Diggler/Hawkins. Luckily for us Quooks he went to UW so now we're telling you that after 12 months that a defense littered with All-Americans could never win you a big game, your QB play started and finished with awful, and recruiting isn't very good. OKG's can't tackle Royce Freeman, fucking stud football players have to do it.
Sark was a shit bird that won 9 games. Peterman is awesome at 8 wins with 4 gimmes?
Your program didn't take one step in a positive direction, you will be less talented next year, Oregon State just got better at the head coaching spot, and Oregon is about to win a National Championship with the most ridiculous infrastructure ever imagined to not take a step back.
Not one thing about Peterman's career suggests he can turn something around and nothing about this year suggest it has started.
If you think Peterman couldn't win with Mariota, you deserve to watch the Buckeyes win 66-0.
Overpaid Peterwacker isn't smart enough to bench a bad QB. Oregon loses 4 games this season with him at the helm.
Helfrich and Coker are different. This isnt Chip's roster. Coker took over a returning juggernaut. Other than Fife not being better than Harrington Oregon always comes up with a QB. Mariota is a system QB. Maybe the best ever but not irreplaceable. Rogers replaced Farve and Young replaced Montana.
Helfrich has proved a lot this year. Petersen hasn't. But AZ is also right in that no one was turning uw in one year.
Petersen has to do something next year to give us hope. Like finding a fucking QB that can play. And actually changing the loser culture even if they lose 4 or 5 games again
Helfrich hasn't proven shit yet. David Shaw won the Pac-12 twice in a row and he sucks.
David Shaw didn't make it to the NCG. He didn't defeat a defending national champion on a 29 game win streak who also happened to have a Heisman winning QB that never lost a college game. HTH.
Helfrich makes it to the natty with Chip's roster in year 2.
What inherent truths were we supposed to pull out of these results again?
All rank speculation at this point, but the "Helfrich is Chip paint fumes + Mariota" routine is lazy. What has Peterman done to improve the program in Seattle to date? If you look at another similar rebuild at Texas, you can see Strong having done a 180 with the defense and cut tons of dead wood even if the team still has a ways to go. UW looks mentally weak, the QB development was atrocious. I find it hard to believe there isn't one serviceable D-1A QB on that roster.
There's not some magic badass powder that emanates from the fucking blue field that keeps Boise being Boise while coaches leave and fail. That is why Mosster is so fucking stupid, and anyone else who tries to connect Petersen to Cudder and Hookins. UW is much more supportive and fruitful for building a program than fucking Colorado and ASU, for reasons that have been iterated here over and over.
It's not a secret, Boise has a winning culture, just like Oregon. It's a matter of changing the culture of UW from one of losing, and that's fucking hard to do. Hence good coaches coming in cleaning house while having mediocre to bad years in year 1. Helfrich hasn't had to change a culture or even deal with any adversity at that program yet.
Not surprising. When you have a city that's run by a gay mayor, an extremist female Muslim liberal, and the first image it conjures up is not greatness but Macklemore, you've got a problem.
Well all we know for certain is Boise is still doing what they've been doing since the late 90's and UW is still doing what they've been doing since the late 90's.
Nothing is concrete yet, but it's fair to assume Peterman is a system coach.
Like Rich Rod? :-*
No. Rich Rod took over a fucking awful West Virginia program and had them in a BCS bowl very quickly. They're basically back to dreck now with the occasional big win. Arizona went from awful to dreck with the occasional big win under the Wrong Stoops. Insert Rich Rod and they are in a BCS bowl after three years.
Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference because he is. Slingblade took over a program going 1,0000mph in the right direction and Peterman was just a cog in the already well oiled machine. Shaw took over a program steam rolling in the right direction. Rich Rod has taken garbage programs to BCS Bowls in a short time twice. No one has even close to that kind of resume in the conference.
When you don't need to fundraise or work very hard at recruiting, or work to get kids to believe in what you are doing you can just focus on being a football coach which means you don't need the entire package like an Urban Meyer to win.
REVISIONIST HISTORY ... BULLSHIT ALERT
Rich Rod took over a 7-5 West Virginia Team who's previous coach had won 61% of his games.
The best thing to ever happen to Rich Rod was Pat White.
3-8 9-4 8-5 8-4 11-1 11-2 10-2 The Michigan Years 8-5 8-5 10-4
Guess what year Pat White started playing?
Rich Rod is a 4 loss coach.
He is what his record says he is.
You ... Mr. "Peterman is all Kellen Moore" should know this better than anyone.
Well all we know for certain is Boise is still doing what they've been doing since the late 90's and UW is still doing what they've been doing since the late 90's.
Nothing is concrete yet, but it's fair to assume Peterman is a system coach.
Like Rich Rod? :-*
No. Rich Rod took over a fucking awful West Virginia program and had them in a BCS bowl very quickly. They're basically back to dreck now with the occasional big win. Arizona went from awful to dreck with the occasional big win under the Wrong Stoops. Insert Rich Rod and they are in a BCS bowl after three years.
Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference because he is. Slingblade took over a program going 1,0000mph in the right direction and Peterman was just a cog in the already well oiled machine. Shaw took over a program steam rolling in the right direction. Rich Rod has taken garbage programs to BCS Bowls in a short time twice. No one has even close to that kind of resume in the conference.
When you don't need to fundraise or work very hard at recruiting, or work to get kids to believe in what you are doing you can just focus on being a football coach which means you don't need the entire package like an Urban Meyer to win.
Richrod's a good coach, but 2011 was kind of an anomaly/Byrne throwaway. AZ was a 6-9 win team from 2007-2010. Stoops gets grief, but he cleaned up Mackodick's garbage.
He also worked over the Big Least when Miami was fading, then out of it. He was beating up Temple, UConn, S. Florida, bad Syracuse, and ordinary Pitt teams.
Then there was the 3-9 season at Michigan.
I think he's one of several good coaches right now. Nobody has stood out as great yet.
Helfrich was such a whiny cunt last night. I can't wait to see him without Mariota and 3/5 of his starting OL (LT, LG, and C).
On another note, Royce Freeman looked off...either he got the flu and lost weight / couldn't work out or he quit taking steroids before mandatory bowl tests.
Comments
Crisped
So if Woodmert hired Urban Meyer do you think he would have went 8-6 with not even a fucking shred of a D-1 QB at the end of the season then had the team come out asleep for the bowl game?
When Boise lost its opener it's 'Oh look how shitty Boise is now with Pete's players. Pete has clearly skipped town and cashed in for a last payday.'
Then Boise finishes their season and it's 'Oh look it's all about Boise, they win no matter who the coach is.'
Which is it coogs and quooks?
No. Rich Rod took over a fucking awful West Virginia program and had them in a BCS bowl very quickly. They're basically back to dreck now with the occasional big win. Arizona went from awful to dreck with the occasional big win under the Wrong Stoops. Insert Rich Rod and they are in a BCS bowl after three years.
Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference because he is. Slingblade took over a program going 1,0000mph in the right direction and Peterman was just a cog in the already well oiled machine. Shaw took over a program steam rolling in the right direction. Rich Rod has taken garbage programs to BCS Bowls in a short time twice. No one has even close to that kind of resume in the conference.
When you don't need to fundraise or work very hard at recruiting, or work to get kids to believe in what you are doing you can just focus on being a football coach which means you don't need the entire package like an Urban Meyer to win.
Sorry, Rich Rod could have "fainted in the driveway" but he doesn't strike me as one of those types.
Pretty simple answer, why did Auburn win the National Title in 2010? Gus Malzahn. They realized that and "fixed the glitch." First year with Gus back and they are playing for a title.
Pete's OC leaves, the program takes a down turn, Pete leaves, the OC comes back as the head man and by the end of year one they win another BCS Bowl.
If Peterman went to Oregon every Doog would be spouting off about how he is another Diggler/Hawkins. Luckily for us Quooks he went to UW so now we're telling you that after 12 months that a defense littered with All-Americans could never win you a big game, your QB play started and finished with awful, and recruiting isn't very good. OKG's can't tackle Royce Freeman, fucking stud football players have to do it.
Sark was a shit bird that won 9 games. Peterman is awesome at 8 wins with 4 gimmes?
Your program didn't take one step in a positive direction, you will be less talented next year, Oregon State just got better at the head coaching spot, and Oregon is about to win a National Championship with the most ridiculous infrastructure ever imagined to not take a step back.
Not one thing about Peterman's career suggests he can turn something around and nothing about this year suggest it has started.
Rich Rod took over a 7-5 West Virginia Team who's previous coach had won 61% of his games.
The best thing to ever happen to Rich Rod was Pat White.
3-8
9-4
8-5
8-4
11-1
11-2
10-2
The Michigan Years
8-5
8-5
10-4
Guess what year Pat White started playing?
Rich Rod is a 4 loss coach.
He is what his record says he is.
You ... Mr. "Peterman is all Kellen Moore" should know this better than anyone.
He also worked over the Big Least when Miami was fading, then out of it. He was beating up Temple, UConn, S. Florida, bad Syracuse, and ordinary Pitt teams.
Then there was the 3-9 season at Michigan.
I think he's one of several good coaches right now. Nobody has stood out as great yet.
On another note, Royce Freeman looked off...either he got the flu and lost weight / couldn't work out or he quit taking steroids before mandatory bowl tests.