Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How Bad are the DT's?

135

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    greenblood said:

    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    C was a failure in my two parent household
    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    C was a failure in my two parent household
    As would be with any high achieving family. Unfortunately, UW is supported by the Lockner family, where participation badges are proudly displayed. Thus, a C average is always acceptable.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    EHud will be situational in Wilcox's system. Settle down and have a STIFF drink. Hudson still going to block on offense. Remember ASJ played some pass-rush DE last year

    Chill, our interior DL will be fine!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,640 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2013
    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    Huh?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,856 Founders Club
    TheKobeStopper said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyJW said:

    DT will be an issue......Don't get mad cause you got called out. Just know the fucking positions and the guys that play 'em......it's not that tough....whiny bitches gonna bitch

    I'm gonna bid dawgman adieu (nice word choice faggot, and I'm appealing the $75,000) and complain that there is no football talk on Hardcore Husky.

    I know the positions and our personnel probably a lot better than you do. Evan Hudson will be playing DE in the 3-4 (Banks, Potoae, ect are his competition there, and DT in the 4-3 where he will have the same competition. In Wilcox's scheme, it changes. For example in the Stanford game, we ran a 4-3 almost the entire game. Agianst the spread teams like Oregon and Arizona, we ran a 3-4. Like I said, a DE in the 3-4 is a 5 tech DT. Same schemes even call them DT, NT, DT for the three down lineman.



    Appeal denied.
    you've got the white wig on and you're judging.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    why don't you guys wait a few games. Look at rush yds/game, scoring defense, passing yds/game, sacks/game, yards/rush etc....before claiming how shitty our DT's are?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BAMAdawg10
    BAMAdawg10 Member Posts: 145
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    why don't you guys wait a few games. Look at rush yds/game, scoring defense, passing yds/game, sacks/game, yards/rush etc....before claiming how shitty our DT's are?

    Sounds like you're suggesting we take a walk with our wives to get some perspective.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    BAMAdawg10 said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    why don't you guys wait a few games. Look at rush yds/game, scoring defense, passing yds/game, sacks/game, yards/rush etc....before claiming how shitty our DT's are?

    Sounds like you're suggesting we take a walk with our wives to get some perspective.
    Disagree. My puppylove_sugarsteel translator reads "Let it play out".


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,423 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2013
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    why don't you guys wait a few games. Look at rush yds/game, scoring defense, passing yds/game, sacks/game, yards/rush etc....before claiming how shitty our DT's are?

    There is some potential that they will be fine. Shelton is a beast. I just find it pathetic that we have one good interior DL. We should have at least 2 Shelton types to go along with a couple other serviceable players. Sark has had 5 recruiting classes to find these guys. Instead, we are depending on a former walk-on TE and true freshmen to step up. What would happen if Shelton got hurt? It's not a formula for success.

    If you listened to Tosh in the Spring, you could tell he didn't think much of the players we have. Potoae is terrible, Banks is a 265 pound DT, I've been told by another player that Tupou might be the worst player on the team, and Finau is worthless. Last year against Utah, Shelton came out, and they threw in Drew Schultz, a walk on, over all the other guys.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    RoadDawg55 said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    why don't you guys wait a few games. Look at rush yds/game, scoring defense, passing yds/game, sacks/game, yards/rush etc....before claiming how shitty our DT's are?

    There is some potential that they will be fine. Shelton is a beast. I just find it pathetic that we have one good interior DL. We should have at least 2 Shelton types to go along with a couple other serviceable players. Sark has had 5 recruiting classes to find these guys. Instead, we are depending on a former walk-on TE and true freshmen to step up. What would happen if Shelton got hurt? It's not a formula for success.

    If you listened to Tosh in the Spring, you could tell he didn't think much of the players we have. Potoae is terrible, Banks is a 265 pound DT, I've been told by another player that Tupou might be the worst player on the team, and Finau is worthless. Last year against Utah, Shelton came out, and they threw in Drew Schultz, a walk on, over all the other guys.

    Not to mention UW was forced to use their 5 star TE to play on the defensive line as well in year four cause we had no DL depth.

    Doogs were too busy sucking ASJ's cock for playing both sides to realize how terrible of a job of recruiting Sark had done to get to that point.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RoadDawg55 said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    why don't you guys wait a few games. Look at rush yds/game, scoring defense, passing yds/game, sacks/game, yards/rush etc....before claiming how shitty our DT's are?

    There is some potential that they will be fine. Shelton is a beast. I just find it pathetic that we have one good interior DL. We should have at least 2 Shelton types to go along with a couple other serviceable players. Sark has had 5 recruiting classes to find these guys. Instead, we are depending on a former walk-on TE and true freshmen to step up. What would happen if Shelton got hurt? It's not a formula for success.

    If you listened to Tosh in the Spring, you could tell he didn't think much of the players we have. Potoae is terrible, Banks is a 265 pound DT, I've been told by another player that Tupou might be the worst player on the team, and Finau is worthless. Last year against Utah, Shelton came out, and they threw in Drew Schultz, a walk on, over all the other guys.

    Tosh just needs more time to get his own bullets in here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter