Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How Bad are the DT's?

RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
edited August 2013 in Hardcore Husky Board
Evan Hudson is running with the 1's at DT already. Potoae, Banks, Tupou, and Finau are fucking worthless. Potoae was the #5 DT coming out of high school and he hasn't had one game where he made a positive impact.

5 fucking recruiting classes and we have a shitty OL and one good DT.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    let it play out
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    I know this splitting a fine hair, but he was running at DE, spot previously held down by Crichton.

    And Finau plays DE.

    But can't argue that Potoa'e has been a major disappointment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,531 Swaye's Wigwam
    Don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited August 2013
    IrishDawg22 said:

    I know this splitting a fine hair, but he was running at DE, spot previously held down by Crichton.

    And Finau plays DE.

    But can't argue that Potoa'e has been a major disappointment.

    Wrong. In the 4-3, Hudson was playing DT with Shelton. Hudson and Shirley were at End. I assume he will be taking Chrichton's place in the 3-4.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    HuskyJW said:

    Don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.

    I actually agree about the DT spot being an issue. Outside of Shelton, there are a lot of ?'s...


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited August 2013
    HuskyJW said:

    Don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.

    So our DT's are good? Swallow your pride, get on your knees, and go back to Dawgman. They will forgive you. Like I said before, if it took the Oregon fiasco for you to realize Kim is full of shit, you are a hopeless moron.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    RoadDawg55 said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    I know this splitting a fine hair, but he was running at DE, spot previously held down by Crichton.

    And Finau plays DE.

    But can't argue that Potoa'e has been a major disappointment.

    Wrong. In the 4-3, Hudson was playing DT with Shelton. Hudson and Shirley were at End. I assume he will be taking Chrichton's place in the 3-4.

    Are you just going by Jude's blog and they way he listed them? Or do you have video or a article saying different?

    The majority of the games starting Dline looked like this:

    DE Hudson
    DT Shelton
    DE Chrichton
    RE (rush end) Shirley
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited August 2013
    IrishDawg22 said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    I know this splitting a fine hair, but he was running at DE, spot previously held down by Crichton.

    And Finau plays DE.

    But can't argue that Potoa'e has been a major disappointment.

    Wrong. In the 4-3, Hudson was playing DT with Shelton. Hudson and Shirley were at End. I assume he will be taking Chrichton's place in the 3-4.

    Are you just going by Jude's blog and they way he listed them? Or do you have video or a article saying different?

    The majority of the games starting Dline looked like this:

    DE Hudson
    DT Shelton
    DE Chrichton
    RE (rush end) Shirley
    Like you said, splitting hairs. Tokalahi took Chrichton's spot at times. It's a versatile defense that changes looks. A DE in the 3-4 is basically a 5 tech DT. Hudson is playing over Banks, Potoae, and the other guys I mentioned.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    edited August 2013
    RoadDawg55 said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    I know this splitting a fine hair, but he was running at DE, spot previously held down by Crichton.

    And Finau plays DE.

    But can't argue that Potoa'e has been a major disappointment.

    Wrong. In the 4-3, Hudson was playing DT with Shelton. Hudson and Shirley were at End. I assume he will be taking Chrichton's place in the 3-4.

    Are you just going by Jude's blog and they way he listed them? Or do you have video or a article saying different?

    The majority of the games starting Dline looked like this:

    DE Hudson
    DT Shelton
    DE Chrichton
    RE (rush end) Shirley
    Like you said, splitting hairs. Tokalahi took Chrichton's spot at times. It's a versatile defense that changes looks. A DE in the 3-4 is basically a 5 tech DT. Hudson is playing over Banks, Potoae, and the other guys I mentioned.

    True.

    Sounds like they started the move in spring. I am a big fan of putting good athletes on D (move Daniels now) and Hudson has a nice frame for a 3-4 DE.

    But I think they just wanted to get him a lot of reps and see how he performs. Based on most of the blogs, a lot of true Frosh got looks but doesn't mean they are going to be stealing playing time.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,531 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited August 2013
    Don't be mad cause ya got called out.

    Have another drink


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited August 2013
    HuskyJW said:

    DT will be an issue......Don't get mad cause you got called out. Just know the fucking positions and the guys that play 'em......it's not that tough....whiny bitches gonna bitch

    I'm gonna bid dawgman adieu (nice word choice faggot, and I'm appealing the $75,000) and complain that there is no football talk on Hardcore Husky.

    I know the positions and our personnel probably a lot better than you do. Evan Hudson will be playing DE in the 3-4 (Banks, Potoae, ect are his competition there, and DT in the 4-3 where he will have the same competition. Banks and Potoae are considered DT's and they play at the same spot.

    In Wilcox's scheme, it changes. For example in the Stanford game, we ran a 4-3 almost the entire game. Agianst the spread teams like Oregon and Arizona, we ran a 3-4. Like I said, a DE in the 3-4 is a 5 tech DT. Same schemes even call them DT, NT, DT for the three down lineman.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyJW said:

    DT will be an issue......Don't get mad cause you got called out. Just know the fucking positions and the guys that play 'em......it's not that tough....whiny bitches gonna bitch

    I'm gonna bid dawgman adieu (nice word choice faggot, and I'm appealing the $75,000) and complain that there is no football talk on Hardcore Husky.

    I know the positions and our personnel probably a lot better than you do. Evan Hudson will be playing DE in the 3-4 (Banks, Potoae, ect are his competition there, and DT in the 4-3 where he will have the same competition. In Wilcox's scheme, it changes. For example in the Stanford game, we ran a 4-3 almost the entire game. Agianst the spread teams like Oregon and Arizona, we ran a 3-4. Like I said, a DE in the 3-4 is a 5 tech DT. Same schemes even call them DT, NT, DT for the three down lineman.



    Appeal denied.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    HuskyJW said:

    Don't be mad cause ya got called out.

    Have another drink


    Thanks for the advice, I will have a few more drinks.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Our DL is young. This only Tosh 2nd year to expect them to be like 1991 every year is just plain unrealistic and won't be tolerated here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtddtd Member Posts: 4,821 Standard Supporter
    IrishDawg22 said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    I know this splitting a fine hair, but he was running at DE, spot previously held down by Crichton.

    And Finau plays DE.

    But can't argue that Potoa'e has been a major disappointment.

    Wrong. In the 4-3, Hudson was playing DT with Shelton. Hudson and Shirley were at End. I assume he will be taking Chrichton's place in the 3-4.

    Are you just going by Jude's blog and they way he listed them? Or do you have video or a article saying different?

    The majority of the games starting Dline looked like this:

    DE Hudson
    DT Shelton
    DE Chrichton
    RE (rush end) Shirley
    Come on guy, surely you know the difference between a 3-4 DE and a 4-3 DE?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,434
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,434
    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    C was a failure in my two parent household
    RaceBannon said:

    greenblood said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Passion said:

    Sark's monumental failure with recruiting interior DLs and OLs is mind-blowing.

    Easiest correction I will make all week.
    Disagree. Ty was a failure. Sark on the other hand continues to maintain a C average.
    C was a failure in my two parent household
    As would be with any high achieving family. Unfortunately, UW is supported by the Focker family, where participation badges are proudly displayed. Thus, a C average is always acceptable.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.