Yes, and I'll be more confident again when we have a white (male, fuck you Hillary) President. Or a non-Socialist anyway...
a white (male, fuck you Hillary) President
I'll take any color as long as they're a fiscal conservative and a Constitutionalist.
HardcoreHusky has a value. Whether it's Husky Football or anything else, this website is a useful reminder that we still have a long ways to go.
Fuck the Constitution!
Nope, just certain peoples' interpretation of it, and its purpose.
+1 Fuck the purpose of the constitution
Fuck establishing a federal government with certain delegated, limited, and enumerated powers with the intention of establishing justice, insuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
Only rich white slave owning nut jobs could think of something as horrible as that.
Yes, and I'll be more confident again when we have a white (male, fuck you Hillary) President. Or a non-Socialist anyway...
a white (male, fuck you Hillary) President
I'll take any color as long as they're a fiscal conservative and a Constitutionalist.
HardcoreHusky has a value. Whether it's Husky Football or anything else, this website is a useful reminder that we still have a long ways to go.
Fuck the Constitution!
Nope, just certain peoples' interpretation of it, and its purpose.
+1 Fuck the purpose of the constitution
Fuck establishing a federal government with certain delegated, limited, and enumerated powers with the intention of establishing justice, insuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
Only rich white slave owning nut jobs could think of something as horrible as that.
When it comes to interpreting documents written well over two hundred years ago, I prefer Mr. Jefferson's approach.
"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
Yes, and I'll be more confident again when we have a white (male, fuck you Hillary) President. Or a non-Socialist anyway...
a white (male, fuck you Hillary) President
I'll take any color as long as they're a fiscal conservative and a Constitutionalist.
HardcoreHusky has a value. Whether it's Husky Football or anything else, this website is a useful reminder that we still have a long ways to go.
Fuck the Constitution!
Nope, just certain peoples' interpretation of it, and its purpose.
+1 Fuck the purpose of the constitution
Fuck establishing a federal government with certain delegated, limited, and enumerated powers with the intention of establishing justice, insuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
Only rich white slave owning nut jobs could think of something as horrible as that.
When it comes to interpreting documents written well over two hundred years ago, I prefer Mr. Jefferson's approach.
"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
If only Mr Jefferson and his contemporaries had created some mechanism for us to make changes to said Constitution when needed.
When it comes to interpreting documents written well over two hundred years ago, I prefer Mr. Jefferson's approach.
"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
Sally Hemings and the rest of Jefferson's slaves appreciate the irony.
Liberals celebrate physical diversity, sexual orientation diversity, religious diversity, literary diversity, entertainment diversity but not diversity of thought.
Simple Fact.
I corrected your statement.
By the way, the laughter you're hearing is coming from the tea party.
Name a single group that "celebrates diversity of thought." I can't think of anyone that loves every single opinion on every single issue, but I can think of some groups that want to outlaw certain "thoughts."
Liberals celebrate physical diversity, sexual orientation diversity, religious diversity, literary diversity, entertainment diversity but not diversity of thought.
Simple Fact.
I corrected your statement.
By the way, the laughter you're hearing is coming from the tea party.
Name a single group that "celebrates diversity of thought." I can't think of anyone that loves every single opinion on every single issue, but I can think of some groups that want to outlaw certain "thoughts."
When it comes to interpreting documents written well over two hundred years ago, I prefer Mr. Jefferson's approach.
"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
Sally Hemings and the rest of Jefferson's slaves appreciate the irony.
Liberals celebrate physical diversity, sexual orientation diversity, religious diversity, literary diversity, entertainment diversity but not diversity of thought.
Simple Fact.
I corrected your statement.
By the way, the laughter you're hearing is coming from the tea party.
Name a single group that "celebrates diversity of thought." I can't think of anyone that loves every single opinion on every single issue, but I can think of some groups that want to outlaw certain "thoughts."
Thanks for helping me make my case
The stereotype for conservatives for is that no diversity is celebrated, including diversity of thought. Not sure what point you're trying to make.
Yes, I am mostly white except when I choose to be something else. It's one of the perks of being American which is far better that what I started out as a Nebraskan.
Liberals celebrate physical diversity, sexual orientation diversity, religious diversity, literary diversity, entertainment diversity but not diversity of thought.
Simple Fact.
I corrected your statement.
By the way, the laughter you're hearing is coming from the tea party.
Name a single group that "celebrates diversity of thought." I can't think of anyone that loves every single opinion on every single issue, but I can think of some groups that want to outlaw certain "thoughts."
Comments
What about White Blacks (White African Americans?) like Obama?
Do you get to choose a life of abundance and be both more optimistic than whites AND less optimistic than blacks and Hispanics?
and
and
Fuck establishing a federal government with certain delegated, limited, and enumerated powers with the intention of establishing justice, insuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
Only rich white slave owning nut jobs could think of something as horrible as that.
"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
When it comes to interpreting documents written well over two hundred years ago, I prefer Mr. Jefferson's approach.
"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
Sally Hemings and the rest of Jefferson's slaves appreciate the irony.
Simple Fact.
By the way, the laughter you're hearing is coming from the tea party.
Name a single group that "celebrates diversity of thought." I can't think of anyone that loves every single opinion on every single issue, but I can think of some groups that want to outlaw certain "thoughts."