Mariota has the highest TD:INT ratio in the history of college football. He's probably the only QB you could ever put on any team regardless of style and they'd probably get better, but never get worse.
Who else could do that?
That is true for a lot of great QB's. Andrew Luck could have played on any team.
Mariota plays behind a pussy OL and has to carry an absolute dreckfest of a defense. He's 2nd all time in the conference in wins(I just made that up by Leinart was 37-2), and is #1 in "points responsible for". The guy's a fucking wizard, he can do it all. If you're doing a schoolyard pick from players throughout history he might be #1 because he can run. Imagine him at USC instead of Leinart, are you fucking kidding me? If you aren't looking for a dual threat QB, Palmer is the 1st off the board.
You are having a rough day. He's going to be the first QB taken in the draft. Saying he's a system QB is an archaic comment. Was Cam Newton a system QB?
Based on pure talent I would have to go with Luck. He has a better arm, more accurate, was also mobile, and had better ball security. I'd love to see what Luck could have done with the same offensive talent around him. Mariota however, would easily be in my top 5 if not 3.
You are having a rough day. He's going to be the first QB taken in the draft. Saying he's a system QB is an archaic comment. Was Cam Newton a system QB?
Comments
Hint: Tui is the last one picked in that scenario.
If we are talking the modern game, I would take Mariota over any QB in Pac history.
I love the ESPN memory here going all the way back to Luck.
If you want a non champ Aikman is better
I love the ESPN memory here going all the way back to Luck.
If you want a non champ Aikman is better
I love the ESPN memory here going all the way back to Luck.
If you want a non champ Aikman is better
I love the ESPN memory here going all the way back to Luck.
If you want a non champ Aikman is better
I love the ESPN memory here going all the way back to Luck.
If you want a non champ Aikman is better