Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Office Battle for Seattle Hoops thread.

2

Comments

  • BrothaStringBrothaString Member Posts: 218
    Gladstone said:

    game isn't on here. looks like winters is playing well? nice to have a real perimeter threat

    Ya, he's looked good. Not sure why you say "real perimeter threat" when CJ Wilcox might have been the best pure shooter in school history.

    Winters is like a poor man's Tre Simmons. 6'5" JC swingman with a knockdown jumper from distance.
  • BrothaStringBrothaString Member Posts: 218
    Andrew Andrews just took a 30 foot three pointer and we could very easily lose this game.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,566 Swaye's Wigwam
    As long as the boyz have fun, that's all that matters
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,018 Founders Club
    Seattle U wins this game.
  • BrothaStringBrothaString Member Posts: 218
    Can we get Andrew Andrews off the damn court?
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,018 Founders Club
    We win every time I post in the game thread.
  • SECisKingSECisKing Member Posts: 920
    Bring on Kentucky
  • BrothaStringBrothaString Member Posts: 218
    Okay but do we have time to run out the clock yet? CHECK THE CHART!
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419

    Gladstone said:

    game isn't on here. looks like winters is playing well? nice to have a real perimeter threat

    Ya, he's looked good. Not sure why you say "real perimeter threat" when CJ Wilcox might have been the best pure shooter in school history.

    Winters is like a poor man's Tre Simmons. 6'5" JC swingman with a knockdown jumper from distance.
    i was referring to this year's team only, i didn't think we had anyone who could make it rain
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    I only watched the first 10 minutes of the second half, but the team is better than last year. They will struggle to score at times, but they are improved on defense. I agree with whoever said if NWG stays for next year, UW should be pretty good. I think another Romar run of finishing top 3 in the Pac and making the 2nd (now 3rd) round of the NCAA tournament is imminent.
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    im·mi·nent
    ˈimənənt/
    adjective
    adjective: imminent

    1.
    about to happen.


    I fucking hope so.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Gladstone said:

    im·mi·nent
    ˈimənənt/
    adjective
    adjective: imminent

    1.
    about to happen.


    I fucking hope so.

    It's not happening this year and the caveat is NWG staying for next year. If he does, it's happening.
  • SevenElevenSevenEleven Member Posts: 318

    I only watched the first 10 minutes of the second half, but the team is better than last year. They will struggle to score at times, but they are improved on defense. I agree with whoever said if NWG stays for next year, UW should be pretty good. I think another Romar run of finishing top 3 in the Pac and making the 2nd (now 3rd) round of the NCAA tournament is imminent.

    No chance. This team is RomarFS. Poor outside shooters. Poor fundamentals. No idea how to attack a zone.

    This team isn't going to get any quality non-conference wins and won't win enough in conference to make the tournament. Arizona, Cal, Stanford, Utah, Colorado, Oregon, ASU and UCLA all have looked better so far. I'm not predicting 9th place, but there are going to be a number of losses playing those teams. Too many to get anything better than the NIT
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    I only watched the first 10 minutes of the second half, but the team is better than last year. They will struggle to score at times, but they are improved on defense. I agree with whoever said if NWG stays for next year, UW should be pretty good. I think another Romar run of finishing top 3 in the Pac and making the 2nd (now 3rd) round of the NCAA tournament is imminent.

    No chance. This team is RomarFS. Poor outside shooters. Poor fundamentals. No idea how to attack a zone.

    This team isn't going to get any quality non-conference wins and won't win enough in conference to make the tournament. Arizona, Cal, Stanford, Utah, Colorado, Oregon, ASU and UCLA all have looked better so far. I'm not predicting 9th place, but there are going to be a number of losses playing those teams. Too many to get anything better than the NIT
    I wasn't talking about this year's team.
  • SevenElevenSevenEleven Member Posts: 318

    I only watched the first 10 minutes of the second half, but the team is better than last year. They will struggle to score at times, but they are improved on defense. I agree with whoever said if NWG stays for next year, UW should be pretty good. I think another Romar run of finishing top 3 in the Pac and making the 2nd (now 3rd) round of the NCAA tournament is imminent.

    No chance. This team is RomarFS. Poor outside shooters. Poor fundamentals. No idea how to attack a zone.

    This team isn't going to get any quality non-conference wins and won't win enough in conference to make the tournament. Arizona, Cal, Stanford, Utah, Colorado, Oregon, ASU and UCLA all have looked better so far. I'm not predicting 9th place, but there are going to be a number of losses playing those teams. Too many to get anything better than the NIT
    I wasn't talking about this year's team.
    So, you are saying after 4 years of missing the tournament, year 5 is going to be speshul?

    Sweet
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614

    I only watched the first 10 minutes of the second half, but the team is better than last year. They will struggle to score at times, but they are improved on defense. I agree with whoever said if NWG stays for next year, UW should be pretty good. I think another Romar run of finishing top 3 in the Pac and making the 2nd (now 3rd) round of the NCAA tournament is imminent.

    No chance. This team is RomarFS. Poor outside shooters. Poor fundamentals. No idea how to attack a zone.

    This team isn't going to get any quality non-conference wins and won't win enough in conference to make the tournament. Arizona, Cal, Stanford, Utah, Colorado, Oregon, ASU and UCLA all have looked better so far. I'm not predicting 9th place, but there are going to be a number of losses playing those teams. Too many to get anything better than the NIT
    I wasn't talking about this year's team.
    So, you are saying after 4 years of missing the tournament, year 5 is going to be speshul?

    Sweet
    He's saying your reading comprehension sucks.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,825
    If we aren't going to bash the coach I'm out
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,660 Founders Club
  • SevenElevenSevenEleven Member Posts: 318
    dnc said:

    I only watched the first 10 minutes of the second half, but the team is better than last year. They will struggle to score at times, but they are improved on defense. I agree with whoever said if NWG stays for next year, UW should be pretty good. I think another Romar run of finishing top 3 in the Pac and making the 2nd (now 3rd) round of the NCAA tournament is imminent.

    No chance. This team is RomarFS. Poor outside shooters. Poor fundamentals. No idea how to attack a zone.

    This team isn't going to get any quality non-conference wins and won't win enough in conference to make the tournament. Arizona, Cal, Stanford, Utah, Colorado, Oregon, ASU and UCLA all have looked better so far. I'm not predicting 9th place, but there are going to be a number of losses playing those teams. Too many to get anything better than the NIT
    I wasn't talking about this year's team.
    So, you are saying after 4 years of missing the tournament, year 5 is going to be speshul?

    Sweet
    He's saying your reading comprehension sucks.
    Suck more of Romar's cock, doog. You haven't gotten quite down to the base over the past few years yet without gagging. I'm sure this time you'll make it.
Sign In or Register to comment.