Doog Myths

RoadDawg55

Give (insert shitty OL recruit) two years with Ivan, and he will be a monster!

Southerndawg

He_Needs_More_Time said:

"You need coaching continuity to succeed! You can't just keep firing coaches all the time. Look at the good teams they all have continuity."

When in reality it's good coaching then produces continuity while continuity doesn't equal good coaching.

Doogs still can't figure this one out.

This is the most dangerous of all doogisms. The facts are simple. "Coaching continuity" with a guy who's not getting it done is tantamount to program suicide.

dhdawg

RoadDawg55 said:

dhdawg said:

"Sark is a victim of his own success" but to b fair, I've only heard this from softy

That one is normally reserved for Romar.

I've heard softy say his "success" in years 1 and 2 raised the expectations over what they should've been in years 3&4 quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever heard

[Deleted User]

Southerndawg said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

"You need coaching continuity to succeed! You can't just keep firing coaches all the time. Look at the good teams they all have continuity."

When in reality it's good coaching then produces continuity while continuity doesn't equal good coaching.

Doogs still can't figure this one out.

This is the most dangerous of all doogisms. The facts are simple. "Coaching continuity" with a guy who's not getting it done is tantamount to program suicide.

I heard it with Ty after 2007 "What you want to just fire a coach so we have 4 head coaches in a 6 year span. I'm glad you aren't A.D."

Now I'm hearing it with Sark. "You can't just keep firing coaches all the time. Look around the league."

Too bad Alabama got immediately great in Saban's 2nd year, Ohio State went from 6-7 to undefeated in Meyer's first year, Stanford/Oregon recent examples.

Oklahoma is the best example the 90's had like 5 coaches in 7 years and won a Natty in Stoops 2nd year.

It's mind boggling when you bring up actual facts to this myth these doogs still argue it.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Sark runs a "pro style" offense ! The fucking idiot. If he truly did he'd be challenging for the pac12 title this year .
OK class, how do we shut down spread offenses? We pound the football like Stanford, keep DAT off the field, kill the clock, play killer defense (which we will ), make field goals and punt well.

Sark ditched the run game ((Sankey did most on his own and in a sort of play-action mode) Sark hasn't lined it up and ran the football since his 1st year. David Shaw lines it up and beats you, Sark puts KP in the gun and uses Sankey for the sneaky little bursts of yardage (big difference)

Second Myth? Sark is an offensive genious. The dude is a paranoid and undisciplined playcaller. Worst I've ever seen, solely because he's the head coach. If he'd ditch playcalling he'd succeed here. He wont so he wont.

Wow, you finally made a fucking point that makes sense. Congrats.

[Deleted User]

Wilcox should be our next head coach is another doog myth.

MikeDamone

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Wilcox should be our next head coach is another doog myth.

I'm hearing he improves defenses every where he goes and even Sven admitted a top 20 finish would be amazing.

[Deleted User]

MikeDamone said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Wilcox should be our next head coach is another doog myth.

I'm hearing he improves defenses every where he goes and even Sven admitted a top 20 finish would be amazing.

Wilcox was better than Holt so that must mean he's a great DC.

MikeDamone

Reser is a tough place to play

RaceBannon

Parker Stadium was tuffer