Doog Myths
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
Like "Nobody wanted to coach the Huskies after 0-12, they tried to get a big name but nobody wanted to come here"
"Firing Lambright for Slick Rick was a mistake"
"Nobody could have predicted that Ty would be such a failure"
"Mark Emmert gets it as a football president"
I'm sure there is countless more that you guys can add.
Comments
-
I remember reading, "The Dawgs might improve next year even though the record will be worse." It was During the Ty error (lol!).
-
Ty wasn't brought here to win games. He was brought here to clean up the program!
Heard that line a lot. -
"Sark is a fantastic recruiter"
-
" would be a 5-star recruit if "
Examples: "Shane Brostek would be a 5-star recruit if he wasn't from Hawaii"
"Andrew Basham would be a 5-star recruit if he had better grades" -
"The fence doesn't matter anyways"
"It's hard to recruit OL to the west coast"
"This years team is the most talented team we've had since the Rose Bowl championship team in 2000"- This has been used almost every fucking year I swear. -
"Keith Price outplayed RG3. Heisman candidate for sure"
-
"The Arizona game plan was a good game plan just Price had trust issues"
-
We could sum almost everything up with the mythical "Offseason NC"
-
"I'll never take issue with a kid choosing (Stanford, Notre Dame, USC, an SEC school, their hometown school, their dream school) over UW"
"Scott, just wanted to say thank you for everything you, Kim, and Chris do for Husky Football. Don't listen to the haters. They don't understand that you only report what you are hearing and that things change. Keep up the good work."
"I'm not worried, he'll change his mind once we get Tosh on him." (after a recruit chooses another school over UW -
"He hates flying"
-
"2013 will be special"
-
The year after next year's team
-
To be fair, this one was basically a Kim-only argument.He_Needs_More_Time said:"The Arizona game plan was a good game plan just Price had trust issues"
-
Never mind the 52 points Wilcox's shitty defense allowed.He_Needs_More_Time said:"The Arizona game plan was a good game plan just Price had trust issues"
-
Race: What is iDawg going to say when Arizona hangs 50 on the Huskies this Saturday night?
iDawg: THEY'RE NOT GOING TO HANG FIFTY! ... JEEPERS! -
Who the fuck is iDawg (RIP) and in what forum would they have had such a conversation?DerekJohnson said:Race: What is iDawg going to say when Arizona hangs 50 on the Huskies this Saturday night?
iDawg: THEY'RE NOT GOING TO HANG FIFTY! ... JEEPERS!
-
Supposedly this happened in a podcast(rip).TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Who the fuck is iDawg (RIP) and in what forum would they have had such a conversation?DerekJohnson said:Race: What is iDawg going to say when Arizona hangs 50 on the Huskies this Saturday night?
iDawg: THEY'RE NOT GOING TO HANG FIFTY! ... JEEPERS! -
"The schedule is so brutal"
"Jake Locker is the best player on the team"
"Neuheisel left this program in a mess." -
"Washington is a football school"
"Washington used to be a football school"
-
FO, GTheGlove said:"Washington is a football school"
"Washington used to be a football school" -
"Would you fire coach X cause him and Sark has similar records at this point?"
Example: After 2 years, doogs brought up how James was only 11-11 while Sark was 12-13. After 3 years, doogs then compared Sark to Harbaugh who was only 17-20. After 4 years now I'm hearing Sark is just like Saban at Michigan State.
Every example changes because that coach had a top 10 finish the following year something Sark is incapable of. -
When are you going to get it through your head that it has nothing to do with the end result, rather, it's all about the journey?!He_Needs_More_Time said:"Would you fire coach X cause him and Sark has similar records at this point?"
Example: After 2 years, doogs brought up how James was only 11-11 while Sark was 12-13. After 3 years, doogs then compared Sark to Harbaugh who was only 17-20. After 4 years now I'm hearing Sark is just like Saban at Michigan State.
Every example changes because that coach had a top 10 finish the following year something Sark is incapable of. -
I'm just happy we are in five star player X top 5.
-
I think this is the winner. I'm just glad we came in 4th for Ruben Foster. It will really open up the pipelines in the future.He_Needs_More_Time said:I'm just happy we are in five star player X top 5.
-
I never boo the kids
-
Blame the previous coach for lack of depth.
Example: Ty in year 3 and 4 had no depth and Doogs blamed Rick signing 7 WR's 4 years earlier. -
Does anyone know what time the game starts? What channel is it on? What channel on Dish? Direct TV? I'm going be on a cruise ship in Antarctica, can I get the game? Where will my dawgs be hooking up for the game? Will it be on in a sports bar? Does the sports bar have cold beer and solid grub? When I go to Chicago what are the cant miss attractions? Should I go to a blues club? Which one? Where is the best pizza? Hot tailgates? Where my dawgs at?
-
Where can I score some hookers and blow?
-
Sark runs a "pro style" offense ! The fucking idiot. If he truly did he'd be challenging for the pac12 title this year .
OK class, how do we shut down spread offenses? We pound the football like Stanford, keep DAT off the field, kill the clock, play killer defense (which we will ), make field goals and punt well.
Sark ditched the run game ((Sankey did most on his own and in a sort of play-action mode) Sark hasn't lined it up and ran the football since his 1st year. David Shaw lines it up and beats you, Sark puts KP in the gun and uses Sankey for the sneaky little bursts of yardage (big difference)
Second Myth? Sark is an offensive genious. The dude is a paranoid and undisciplined playcaller. Worst I've ever seen, solely because he's the head coach. If he'd ditch playcalling he'd succeed here. He wont so he wont.
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark runs a "pro style" offense ! The fucking idiot. If he truly did he'd be challenging for the pac12 title this year .
OK class, how do we shut down spread offenses? We pound the football like Stanford, keep DAT off the field, kill the clock, play killer defense (which we will ), make field goals and punt well.
Sark ditched the run game ((Sankey did most on his own and in a sort of play-action mode) Sark hasn't lined it up and ran the football since his 1st year. David Shaw lines it up and beats you, Sark puts KP in the gun and uses Sankey for the sneaky little bursts of yardage (big dif )
Myth 2? Sark is an offensive genious. The dude is a paranoid and undisciplined playcaller. Worst I've ever seen, solely because he's the head coach. If he'd ditch playcalling he'd succeed here. He wont so he wont.
